modify documents

This commit is contained in:
김경종
2026-06-11 11:08:27 +09:00
parent 98eba54a12
commit 986cc9888e
35 changed files with 1984 additions and 169 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ description: "Use when reviewing this Abaqus User Subroutine Harness repository:
## Overview
Use this skill to review Harness work against repository rules, Abaqus User Subroutine workflow, Fortran TDD, no-Abaqus validation, reference artifact contracts, and explicit Abaqus opt-in validation requirements. Prioritize bugs, regressions, missing tests, and rule violations.
Use this skill to review Harness work against repository rules, Abaqus User Subroutine workflow, Fortran TDD, no-Abaqus validation, reference artifact contracts, and externally generated extracted CSV validation requirements. Prioritize bugs, regressions, missing tests, and rule violations.
## Review Process
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Use this skill to review Harness work against repository rules, Abaqus User Subr
| Tests | Are new or changed Fortran behaviors covered by no-Abaqus Fortran/Python tests or harness tests? |
| TDD Guard | Would Fortran production edits be blocked without related tests? |
| References | Do reference artifacts include `.inp`, source hash, Abaqus version, compiler version, msg/dat/log tail, and extracted CSV contracts when required? |
| Abaqus Opt-in | Is `HARNESS_ABAQUS_VALIDATION=run` used only when explicitly configured? |
| External Results | Are solver-result checks based on externally generated ODB-extracted CSV artifacts rather than local solver runs? |
| Build | Do the Python, Fortran, reference artifact, and workspace validation commands pass or report expected skips? |
## Output Format
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ If there are findings, list them first in severity order with file and line refe
| Tests | PASS/FAIL | {detail} |
| TDD Guard | PASS/FAIL | {detail} |
| Reference Artifacts | PASS/FAIL | {detail} |
| Abaqus Opt-in | PASS/FAIL | {detail} |
| External Results | PASS/FAIL | {detail} |
| Validation | PASS/FAIL | {detail} |
When there are no findings, say that clearly, then mention commands not run or remaining risk.