# Step 3: source-review-outline

## Read First
- /AGENTS.md
- /docs/PRD.md
- /docs/ARCHITECTURE.md
- /docs/ADR.md
- /docs/UI_GUIDE.md
- /docs/RESEARCH_LOG.md
- /docs/REPORT_DRAFT.md
- /phases/0-report-generation/index.json

## Task
Review `docs/RESEARCH_LOG.md` for source quality, source freshness, conflicts, weak claims, and missing evidence. Then create or refine the report outline in `docs/REPORT_DRAFT.md`.

The outline must reflect the report purpose, keywords, direction, audience, and output format from `docs/PRD.md`. Include placeholders for key claims, supporting sources, risks, uncertainty, and feedback questions.

## Acceptance Criteria
```bash
python scripts/validate_workspace.py
```

## Verification
1. Run the acceptance command.
2. Confirm the outline follows `docs/UI_GUIDE.md`.
3. Confirm major sections have evidence sources or explicit evidence gaps.
4. Update this step in `phases/0-report-generation/index.json`.

## Do Not
- Do not hide source weaknesses because they are inconvenient.
- Do not delete useful research history from `docs/RESEARCH_LOG.md`.
- Do not write polished conclusions that are not supported by the reviewed sources.