diff --git a/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json b/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json
index a013e4f..7b66f78 100644
--- a/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json
+++ b/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json
@@ -29,8 +29,11 @@
{
"step": 3,
"name": "core-ids-and-diagnostics",
- "status": "pending"
+ "status": "completed",
+ "summary": "Added dependency-free EntityId, Vec3 finiteness validation, SourceLocation/Diagnostic/Status headers, and core unit tests.",
+ "started_at": "2026-07-30T12:53:17+0900",
+ "completed_at": "2026-07-30T13:01:14+0900"
}
],
"created_at": "2026-07-29T23:58:15+0900"
-}
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/phases/solver-bootstrap/step3-output.json b/phases/solver-bootstrap/step3-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8d29562
--- /dev/null
+++ b/phases/solver-bootstrap/step3-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+ "step": 3,
+ "name": "core-ids-and-diagnostics",
+ "exitCode": 0,
+ "stdout": "{\"type\":\"thread.started\",\"thread_id\":\"019fb127-bcc2-7353-840a-08ec5c65b1cb\"}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_0\",\"type\":\"error\",\"message\":\"`--dangerously-bypass-hook-trust` is enabled. Enabled hooks may run without review for this invocation.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_1\",\"type\":\"error\",\"message\":\"`--dangerously-bypass-hook-trust` is enabled. Enabled hooks may run without review for this invocation.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"turn.started\"}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_2\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"이번 Step 3은 기존 설계 문서와 명시된 인터페이스를 그대로 따르는 구현입니다. 저장소 실행 계약을 지키기 위해 `harness`, 테스트 우선 구현을 위해 `superpowers:test-driven-development`, 완료 판정 전에 `superpowers:verification-before-completion`을 사용하겠습니다. 먼저 필수 스킬 지침과 지정 파일을 모두 읽고, 성공 기준을 짧게 고정한 뒤 테스트→최소 구현→전체 검증→phase index 갱신 순서로 진행하겠습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_3\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"\\\"C:\\\\\\\\Program Files\\\\\\\\WindowsApps\\\\\\\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\\\\\\\pwsh.exe\\\" -Command \\\"Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\using-superpowers\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw '.agents\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\harness\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\test-driven-development\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\verification-before-completion\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'\\\"\",\"aggregated_output\":\"\",\"exit_code\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_3\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"\\\"C:\\\\\\\\Program Files\\\\\\\\WindowsApps\\\\\\\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\\\\\\\pwsh.exe\\\" -Command \\\"Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\using-superpowers\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw '.agents\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\harness\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\test-driven-development\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\verification-before-completion\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'\\\"\",\"aggregated_output\":\"execution error: Io(Custom { kind: Other, error: \\\"windows sandbox: runner failed during SpawnChild: CreateProcessAsUserW failed: 5 (액세스가 거부되었습니다.) | cwd=C:\\\\\\\\git\\\\\\\\FESA\\\\\\\\.worktrees\\\\\\\\solver-bootstrap | cmd=\\\\\\\"C:\\\\\\\\Program Files\\\\\\\\WindowsApps\\\\\\\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\\\\\\\pwsh.exe\\\\\\\" -NoProfile -Command \\\\\\\"try { [Console]::OutputEncoding=[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8 } catch {}\\\\nGet-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\using-superpowers\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw '.agents\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\harness\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\test-driven-development\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\\\\\Users\\\\\\\\baram\\\\\\\\.codex\\\\\\\\plugins\\\\\\\\cache\\\\\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\\\\\superpowers\\\\\\\\6.2.0\\\\\\\\skills\\\\\\\\verification-before-completion\\\\\\\\SKILL.md'\\\\\\\" | env_u16_len=6601 | si_flags=256 | creation_flags=525312 (Windows error 5)\\\" })\",\"exit_code\":-1,\"status\":\"failed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_4\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"스킬 문서 읽기 명령이 Windows 샌드박스의 프로세스 생성 단계에서 거부되었습니다(명령 자체가 실행되기 전의 접근 거부). 저장소나 파일을 변경한 상태는 아닙니다. 동일 범위를 더 작은 읽기 명령으로 나누어 원인을 분리하고 계속 진행하겠습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_5\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"\\\"C:\\\\\\\\Program Files\\\\\\\\WindowsApps\\\\\\\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\\\\\\\pwsh.exe\\\" -Command Get-Location\",\"aggregated_output\":\"\",\"exit_code\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_5\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"\\\"C:\\\\\\\\Program Files\\\\\\\\WindowsApps\\\\\\\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\\\\\\\pwsh.exe\\\" -Command Get-Location\",\"aggregated_output\":\"execution error: Io(Custom { kind: Other, error: \\\"windows sandbox: runner failed during SpawnChild: CreateProcessAsUserW failed: 5 (액세스가 거부되었습니다.) | cwd=C:\\\\\\\\git\\\\\\\\FESA\\\\\\\\.worktrees\\\\\\\\solver-bootstrap | cmd=\\\\\\\"C:\\\\\\\\Program Files\\\\\\\\WindowsApps\\\\\\\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\\\\\\\pwsh.exe\\\\\\\" -NoProfile -Command \\\\\\\"try { [Console]::OutputEncoding=[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8 } catch {}\\\\nGet-Location\\\\\\\" | env_u16_len=6601 | si_flags=256 | creation_flags=525312 (Windows error 5)\\\" })\",\"exit_code\":-1,\"status\":\"failed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_6\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var fs3 = await import('node:fs/promises'); var skillPaths3 = [String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-superpowers\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\.agents\\\\skills\\\\harness\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\test-driven-development\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\verification-before-completion\\\\SKILL.md`]; for (var p3 of skillPaths3) { nodeRepl.write(`\\\\n===== ${p3} =====\\\\n${await fs3.readFile(p3,'utf8')}\\\\n`); }\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read required skill instructions\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_6\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var fs3 = await import('node:fs/promises'); var skillPaths3 = [String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-superpowers\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\.agents\\\\skills\\\\harness\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\test-driven-development\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\verification-before-completion\\\\SKILL.md`]; for (var p3 of skillPaths3) { nodeRepl.write(`\\\\n===== ${p3} =====\\\\n${await fs3.readFile(p3,'utf8')}\\\\n`); }\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read required skill instructions\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"\\n===== C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-superpowers\\\\SKILL.md =====\\n---\\nname: using-superpowers\\ndescription: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions\\n---\\n\\n\\nIf you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, ignore this skill.\\n\\n\\n\\nIf you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.\\n\\nIF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.\\n\\nThis is not negotiable. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.\\n\\n\\n## The Rule\\n\\n**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action** — including clarifying questions, exploring the codebase, or checking files. If it turns out wrong for the situation, you don't have to use it.\\n\\n**Before entering plan mode:** if you haven't already brainstormed, invoke the brainstorming skill first.\\n\\nThen announce \\\"Using [skill] to [purpose]\\\" and follow the skill exactly. If it has a checklist, create a todo per item.\\n\\n## Skill Priority\\n\\nWhen multiple skills apply, process skills come first — they set the approach, then implementation skills (frontend-design, etc.) carry it out. Brainstorming and systematic-debugging are Superpowers' most common process skills, but the rule holds for any of them.\\n\\n- \\\"Let's build X\\\" → superpowers:brainstorming first, then implementation skills.\\n- \\\"Fix this bug\\\" → superpowers:systematic-debugging first, then domain skills.\\n\\n## Red Flags\\n\\nThese thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:\\n\\n| Thought | Reality |\\n|---------|---------|\\n| \\\"This is just a simple question\\\" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |\\n| \\\"I need more context first\\\" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |\\n| \\\"Let me explore the codebase first\\\" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |\\n| \\\"I can check git/files quickly\\\" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |\\n| \\\"Let me gather information first\\\" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |\\n| \\\"This doesn't need a formal skill\\\" | If a skill exists, use it. |\\n| \\\"I remember this skill\\\" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |\\n| \\\"This doesn't count as a task\\\" | Action = task. Check for skills. |\\n| \\\"The skill is overkill\\\" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |\\n| \\\"I'll just do this one thing first\\\" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |\\n| \\\"This feels productive\\\" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |\\n| \\\"I know what that means\\\" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |\\n\\n## Platform Adaptation\\n\\nIf your harness appears here, read its reference file for special instructions:\\n\\n- Codex: `references/codex-tools.md`\\n- Pi: `references/pi-tools.md`\\n- Antigravity: `references/antigravity-tools.md`\\n\\n## User Instructions\\n\\nUser instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, etc, direct requests) take precedence over skills, which in turn override default behavior. Only skip skill workflows or instructions when your human partner has explicitly told you to.\\n\\n\\n===== C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\.agents\\\\skills\\\\harness\\\\SKILL.md =====\\n---\\r\\nname: harness\\r\\ndescription: Use when planning agentic implementation phases, creating phases/index.json and self-contained step files, or running the Harness step executor.\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n# Harness Workflow\\r\\n\\r\\n이 프로젝트는 Harness 프레임워크를 사용한다. 아래 워크플로에 따라 작업한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## A. 탐색\\r\\n\\r\\n`AGENTS.md`와 `docs/` 하위 문서(PRD, ARCHITECTURE, ADR 등)를 읽고 프로젝트의 기획,\\r\\n아키텍처, 설계 의도를 파악한다. 병렬 탐색이 실제로 유용하고 현재 세션에서 허용될\\r\\n때만 Codex subagent를 선택적으로 사용한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## B. 논의\\r\\n\\r\\n구현을 위해 구체화하거나 기술적으로 결정해야 할 사항이 있으면 사용자에게 한 번에\\r\\n하나씩 제시하고 논의한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## C. Step 설계\\r\\n\\r\\n사용자가 구현 계획 작성을 지시하면 여러 step으로 나뉜 초안을 작성해 피드백을\\r\\n요청한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n설계 원칙:\\r\\n\\r\\n1. **Scope 최소화** — 하나의 step에서 하나의 레이어 또는 모듈만 다룬다. 여러\\r\\n 모듈을 동시에 수정해야 하면 step을 쪼갠다.\\r\\n2. **자기완결성** — 각 step 파일은 독립된 Codex 실행에서 사용된다. 외부 대화\\r\\n 참조를 금지하고 필요한 정보를 모두 파일 안에 적는다.\\r\\n3. **사전 준비 강제** — 관련 문서와 이전 step에서 생성하거나 수정한 파일 경로를\\r\\n 명시한다.\\r\\n4. **시그니처 수준 지시** — 함수와 클래스의 인터페이스를 제시하고 내부 구현은\\r\\n Codex 재량에 맡긴다. 멱등성, 보안, 데이터 무결성 같은 핵심 규칙은 명시한다.\\r\\n5. **AC는 실행 가능한 command** — 추상적 조건 대신 실제 빌드와 테스트 command를\\r\\n 포함한다.\\r\\n6. **주의사항은 구체적으로** — \\\"X를 하지 마라. 이유: Y\\\" 형식으로 적는다.\\r\\n7. **네이밍** — step name은 핵심 작업을 표현하는 kebab-case slug로 정한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## D. 파일 생성\\r\\n\\r\\n사용자가 초안을 승인한 후에만 다음 파일을 생성한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n### D-1. `phases/index.json`\\r\\n\\r\\n여러 task를 관리하는 top-level 인덱스다. 이미 존재하면 `phases` 배열에 새 항목을\\r\\n추가한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n```json\\r\\n{\\r\\n \\\"phases\\\": [\\r\\n {\\r\\n \\\"dir\\\": \\\"0-mvp\\\",\\r\\n \\\"status\\\": \\\"pending\\\"\\r\\n }\\r\\n ]\\r\\n}\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- `dir`: task 디렉터리명\\r\\n- `status`: `pending` | `completed` | `error` | `blocked`\\r\\n- timestamp는 executor가 상태를 바꿀 때 기록하므로 생성 시 넣지 않는다.\\r\\n\\r\\n### D-2. `phases/{task-name}/index.json`\\r\\n\\r\\n```json\\r\\n{\\r\\n \\\"project\\\": \\\"<프로젝트명>\\\",\\r\\n \\\"phase\\\": \\\"\\\",\\r\\n \\\"steps\\\": [\\r\\n { \\\"step\\\": 0, \\\"name\\\": \\\"project-setup\\\", \\\"status\\\": \\\"pending\\\" },\\r\\n { \\\"step\\\": 1, \\\"name\\\": \\\"core-types\\\", \\\"status\\\": \\\"pending\\\" },\\r\\n { \\\"step\\\": 2, \\\"name\\\": \\\"api-layer\\\", \\\"status\\\": \\\"pending\\\" }\\r\\n ]\\r\\n}\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n필드 규칙:\\r\\n\\r\\n- `project`: `AGENTS.md`에 정의된 프로젝트명\\r\\n- `phase`: task 이름이며 디렉터리명과 일치\\r\\n- `steps[].step`: 0부터 시작하는 순번\\r\\n- `steps[].name`: kebab-case slug\\r\\n- `steps[].status`: 초기값 `pending`\\r\\n\\r\\n상태와 기록 주체:\\r\\n\\r\\n| 전이 | 기록 필드 | 기록 주체 |\\r\\n|------|-----------|-----------|\\r\\n| `completed` | `summary`, `completed_at` | Codex가 summary, executor가 timestamp |\\r\\n| `error` | `error_message`, `failed_at` | Codex가 message, executor가 timestamp |\\r\\n| `blocked` | `blocked_reason`, `blocked_at` | Codex가 reason, executor가 timestamp |\\r\\n\\r\\n`summary`에는 다음 step에 유용한 생성 파일과 핵심 결정을 한 줄로 적는다.\\r\\ntask `created_at`과 step `started_at`은 executor가 기록하므로 생성 시 넣지 않는다.\\r\\n\\r\\n### D-3. `phases/{task-name}/step{N}.md`\\r\\n\\r\\n````markdown\\r\\n# Step {N}: {이름}\\r\\n\\r\\n## 읽어야 할 파일\\r\\n\\r\\n먼저 아래 파일을 읽고 프로젝트의 아키텍처와 설계 의도를 파악하라:\\r\\n\\r\\n- `/AGENTS.md`\\r\\n- `/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`\\r\\n- `/docs/ADR.md`\\r\\n- 이전 step에서 생성하거나 수정한 파일 경로\\r\\n\\r\\n이전 step의 코드를 꼼꼼히 읽고 설계 의도를 이해한 뒤 작업하라.\\r\\n\\r\\n## 작업\\r\\n\\r\\n구체적인 구현 지시를 파일 경로, 클래스와 함수 시그니처, 로직 설명과 함께 적는다.\\r\\n구현체는 Codex에 맡기되 설계 의도에서 벗어나면 안 되는 핵심 규칙은 명시한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\r\\n\\r\\n프로젝트 형식에 맞는 명령을 사용한다. `.harness/config.json`이 있으면 해당 preset,\\r\\nsolution, configuration, platform, test command를 우선한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\n# CMake\\r\\ncmake --build .harness/build --config Debug\\r\\nctest --test-dir .harness/build -C Debug --output-on-failure\\r\\n\\r\\n# 직접 MSBuild\\r\\nMSBuild.exe MyProject.sln /m /p:Configuration=Debug /p:Platform=x64\\r\\n.\\\\build\\\\tests\\\\Debug\\\\MyProjectTests.exe\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n## 검증 절차\\r\\n\\r\\n1. Acceptance Criteria command를 실행한다.\\r\\n2. ARCHITECTURE 디렉터리 구조를 따르는지 확인한다.\\r\\n3. ADR 기술 스택과 `AGENTS.md` CRITICAL 규칙을 확인한다.\\r\\n4. 결과에 따라 task index의 해당 step을 갱신한다.\\r\\n - 성공: `status`를 `completed`로 바꾸고 한 줄 `summary` 기록\\r\\n - 수정 3회 후 실패: `status`를 `error`로 바꾸고 `error_message` 기록\\r\\n - 사용자 개입 필요: `status`를 `blocked`로 바꾸고 `blocked_reason` 기록 후 중단\\r\\n\\r\\n## 금지사항\\r\\n\\r\\n- 이 step의 범위 밖 기능을 추가하지 마라. 이유: step의 독립성을 깨뜨린다.\\r\\n- 기존 테스트를 깨뜨리지 마라. 이유: 이전 동작을 회귀시킨다.\\r\\n````\\r\\n\\r\\n## E. 실행\\r\\n\\r\\n```bash\\r\\npython scripts/execute.py {task-name}\\r\\npython scripts/execute.py {task-name} --push\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n환경에서 Python 3 실행 명령이 `python3`이면 그 명령을 대신 사용한다.\\r\\n\\r\\nexecutor가 처리하는 작업:\\r\\n\\r\\n- `feat-{task-name}` 브랜치 생성 또는 checkout\\r\\n- `AGENTS.md`와 `docs/*.md` guardrail 주입\\r\\n- 완료 step의 summary를 다음 prompt에 누적\\r\\n- 실패 시 최대 3회 재시도하며 이전 오류를 prompt에 전달\\r\\n- 코드 변경과 metadata를 분리해 commit\\r\\n- `started_at`, `completed_at`, `failed_at`, `blocked_at` 기록\\r\\n\\r\\n에러 복구:\\r\\n\\r\\n- `error`: 해당 status를 `pending`으로 바꾸고 `error_message`를 삭제한 뒤 재실행\\r\\n- `blocked`: 원인을 해결하고 status를 `pending`으로 바꾸고 `blocked_reason`을 삭제한\\r\\n 뒤 재실행\\r\\n\\n\\n===== C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\test-driven-development\\\\SKILL.md =====\\n---\\nname: test-driven-development\\ndescription: Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code\\n---\\n\\n# Test-Driven Development (TDD)\\n\\n## Overview\\n\\nWrite the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.\\n\\n**Core principle:** If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.\\n\\n**Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.**\\n\\n## When to Use\\n\\n**Always:**\\n- New features\\n- Bug fixes\\n- Refactoring\\n- Behavior changes\\n\\n**Exceptions (ask your human partner):**\\n- Throwaway prototypes\\n- Generated code\\n- Configuration files\\n\\nThinking \\\"skip TDD just this once\\\"? Stop. That's rationalization.\\n\\n## The Iron Law\\n\\n```\\nNO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST\\n```\\n\\nWrite code before the test? Delete it. Start over.\\n\\n**No exceptions:**\\n- Don't keep it as \\\"reference\\\"\\n- Don't \\\"adapt\\\" it while writing tests\\n- Don't look at it\\n- Delete means delete\\n\\nImplement fresh from tests. Period.\\n\\n## Red-Green-Refactor\\n\\n```dot\\ndigraph tdd_cycle {\\n rankdir=LR;\\n red [label=\\\"RED\\\\nWrite failing test\\\", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=\\\"#ffcccc\\\"];\\n verify_red [label=\\\"Verify fails\\\\ncorrectly\\\", shape=diamond];\\n green [label=\\\"GREEN\\\\nMinimal code\\\", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=\\\"#ccffcc\\\"];\\n verify_green [label=\\\"Verify passes\\\\nAll green\\\", shape=diamond];\\n refactor [label=\\\"REFACTOR\\\\nClean up\\\", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=\\\"#ccccff\\\"];\\n next [label=\\\"Next\\\", shape=ellipse];\\n\\n red -> verify_red;\\n verify_red -> green [label=\\\"yes\\\"];\\n verify_red -> red [label=\\\"wrong\\\\nfailure\\\"];\\n green -> verify_green;\\n verify_green -> refactor [label=\\\"yes\\\"];\\n verify_green -> green [label=\\\"no\\\"];\\n refactor -> verify_green [label=\\\"stay\\\\ngreen\\\"];\\n verify_green -> next;\\n next -> red;\\n}\\n```\\n\\n### RED - Write Failing Test\\n\\nWrite one minimal test showing what should happen.\\n\\n\\n```typescript\\ntest('retries failed operations 3 times', async () => {\\n let attempts = 0;\\n const operation = () => {\\n attempts++;\\n if (attempts < 3) throw new Error('fail');\\n return 'success';\\n };\\n\\n const result = await retryOperation(operation);\\n\\n expect(result).toBe('success');\\n expect(attempts).toBe(3);\\n});\\n```\\nClear name, tests real behavior, one thing\\n\\n\\n\\n```typescript\\ntest('retry works', async () => {\\n const mock = jest.fn()\\n .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error())\\n .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error())\\n .mockResolvedValueOnce('success');\\n await retryOperation(mock);\\n expect(mock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);\\n});\\n```\\nVague name, tests mock not code\\n\\n\\n**Requirements:**\\n- One behavior\\n- Clear name\\n- Real code (no mocks unless unavoidable)\\n\\n### Verify RED - Watch It Fail\\n\\n**MANDATORY. Never skip.**\\n\\n```bash\\nnpm test path/to/test.test.ts\\n```\\n\\nConfirm:\\n- Test fails (not errors)\\n- Failure message is expected\\n- Fails because feature missing (not typos)\\n\\n**Test passes?** You're testing existing behavior. Fix test.\\n\\n**Test errors?** Fix error, re-run until it fails correctly.\\n\\n### GREEN - Minimal Code\\n\\nWrite simplest code to pass the test.\\n\\n\\n```typescript\\nasync function retryOperation(fn: () => Promise): Promise {\\n for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {\\n try {\\n return await fn();\\n } catch (e) {\\n if (i === 2) throw e;\\n }\\n }\\n throw new Error('unreachable');\\n}\\n```\\nJust enough to pass\\n\\n\\n\\n```typescript\\nasync function retryOperation(\\n fn: () => Promise,\\n options?: {\\n maxRetries?: number;\\n backoff?: 'linear' | 'exponential';\\n onRetry?: (attempt: number) => void;\\n }\\n): Promise {\\n // YAGNI\\n}\\n```\\nOver-engineered\\n\\n\\nDon't add features, refactor other code, or \\\"improve\\\" beyond the test.\\n\\n### Verify GREEN - Watch It Pass\\n\\n**MANDATORY.**\\n\\n```bash\\nnpm test path/to/test.test.ts\\n```\\n\\nConfirm:\\n- Test passes\\n- Other tests still pass\\n- Output pristine (no errors, warnings)\\n\\n**Test fails?** Fix code, not test.\\n\\n**Other tests fail?** Fix now.\\n\\n### REFACTOR - Clean Up\\n\\nAfter green only:\\n- Remove duplication\\n- Improve names\\n- Extract helpers\\n\\nKeep tests green. Don't add behavior.\\n\\n### Repeat\\n\\nNext failing test for next feature.\\n\\n## Good Tests\\n\\n| Quality | Good | Bad |\\n|---------|------|-----|\\n| **Minimal** | One thing. \\\"and\\\" in name? Split it. | `test('validates email and domain and whitespace')` |\\n| **Clear** | Name describes behavior | `test('test1')` |\\n| **Shows intent** | Demonstrates desired API | Obscures what code should do |\\n\\nWhen writing or changing any test, read [writing-good-tests.md](writing-good-tests.md) for the rules that keep tests honest:\\n- Name the production change that would make the test fail — before writing it\\n- Assert on real behavior, never on mock behavior\\n- Keep test-only code in test utilities, out of production classes\\n- Understand a dependency's side effects before mocking it\\n\\n## Common Rationalizations\\n\\n| Excuse | Reality |\\n|--------|---------|\\n| \\\"Too simple to test\\\" | Simple code breaks. Test takes 30 seconds. |\\n| \\\"I'll test after\\\" | Tests written after pass immediately — which proves nothing. They may test the wrong thing, test the implementation instead of the behavior, or miss the edge case you forgot. You never watched it fail, so you never proved it can catch the bug. Test-first forces that failure. |\\n| \\\"Tests after achieve same goals (spirit not ritual)\\\" | Tests-after answer \\\"what does this do?\\\"; tests-first answer \\\"what should this do?\\\" Tests written after are biased by the code you already wrote — you verify the cases you remembered, not the ones you'd have discovered. Coverage without proof the tests work. |\\n| \\\"Already manually tested\\\" | Manual testing is ad-hoc: no record of what you covered, no way to re-run it when the code changes, easy to forget cases under pressure. \\\"Worked when I tried it\\\" ≠ comprehensive. Automated tests run the same way every time. |\\n| \\\"Deleting X hours is wasteful\\\" | Sunk cost fallacy — that time is already spent either way. The real choice: rewrite with TDD (high confidence) vs. keep it and bolt tests on after (low confidence, likely bugs). Keeping code you can't trust is the waste. |\\n| \\\"Keep as reference, write tests first\\\" | You'll adapt it. That's testing after. Delete means delete. |\\n| \\\"Need to explore first\\\" | Fine. Throw away exploration, start with TDD. |\\n| \\\"Test hard = design unclear\\\" | Listen to test. Hard to test = hard to use. |\\n| \\\"TDD will slow me down\\\" | TDD IS the pragmatic path: catches bugs before commit, prevents regressions, lets you refactor without fear. \\\"Pragmatic\\\" shortcuts mean debugging in production — slower, not faster. |\\n| \\\"Manual test faster\\\" | Manual doesn't prove edge cases. You'll re-test every change. |\\n| \\\"Existing code has no tests\\\" | You're improving it. Add tests for existing code. |\\n\\n## Red Flags - STOP and Start Over\\n\\n- Code before test\\n- Test after implementation\\n- Test passes immediately\\n- Can't explain why test failed\\n- Tests added \\\"later\\\"\\n- Rationalizing \\\"just this once\\\"\\n- \\\"I already manually tested it\\\"\\n- \\\"Tests after achieve the same purpose\\\"\\n- \\\"It's about spirit not ritual\\\"\\n- \\\"Keep as reference\\\" or \\\"adapt existing code\\\"\\n- \\\"Already spent X hours, deleting is wasteful\\\"\\n- \\\"TDD is dogmatic, I'm being pragmatic\\\"\\n- \\\"This is different because...\\\"\\n\\n**All of these mean: Delete code. Start over with TDD.**\\n\\n## Example: Bug Fix\\n\\n**Bug:** Empty email accepted\\n\\n**RED**\\n```typescript\\ntest('rejects empty email', async () => {\\n const result = await submitForm({ email: '' });\\n expect(result.error).toBe('Email required');\\n});\\n```\\n\\n**Verify RED**\\n```bash\\n$ npm test\\nFAIL: expected 'Email required', got undefined\\n```\\n\\n**GREEN**\\n```typescript\\nfunction submitForm(data: FormData) {\\n if (!data.email?.trim()) {\\n return { error: 'Email required' };\\n }\\n // ...\\n}\\n```\\n\\n**Verify GREEN**\\n```bash\\n$ npm test\\nPASS\\n```\\n\\n**REFACTOR**\\nExtract validation for multiple fields if needed.\\n\\n## Verification Checklist\\n\\nBefore marking work complete:\\n\\n- [ ] Every new function/method has a test\\n- [ ] Watched each test fail before implementing\\n- [ ] Each test failed for expected reason (feature missing, not typo)\\n- [ ] Wrote minimal code to pass each test\\n- [ ] All tests pass\\n- [ ] Output pristine (no errors, warnings)\\n- [ ] Tests use real code (mocks only if unavoidable)\\n- [ ] Edge cases and errors covered\\n\\nCan't check all boxes? You skipped TDD. Start over.\\n\\n## When Stuck\\n\\n| Problem | Solution |\\n|---------|----------|\\n| Don't know how to test | Write wished-for API. Write assertion first. Ask your human partner. |\\n| Test too complicated | Design too complicated. Simplify interface. |\\n| Must mock everything | Code too coupled. Use dependency injection. |\\n| Test setup huge | Extract helpers. Still complex? Simplify design. |\\n\\n## Debugging Integration\\n\\nBug found? Write failing test reproducing it. Follow TDD cycle. Test proves fix and prevents regression.\\n\\nNever fix bugs without a test.\\n\\n## Final Rule\\n\\n```\\nProduction code → test exists and failed first\\nOtherwise → not TDD\\n```\\n\\nNo exceptions without your human partner's permission.\\n\\n\\n===== C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\verification-before-completion\\\\SKILL.md =====\\n---\\nname: verification-before-completion\\ndescription: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always\\n---\\n\\n# Verification Before Completion\\n\\n## Overview\\n\\n**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.\\n\\n**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**\\n\\n## The Iron Law\\n\\n```\\nNO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE\\n```\\n\\nIf you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.\\n\\n## The Gate Function\\n\\n```\\nBEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:\\n\\n1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?\\n2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)\\n3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures\\n4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?\\n - If NO: State actual status with evidence\\n - If YES: State claim WITH evidence\\n5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim\\n\\nSkip any step = lying, not verifying\\n```\\n\\n## Common Failures\\n\\n| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |\\n|-------|----------|----------------|\\n| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, \\\"should pass\\\" |\\n| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |\\n| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |\\n| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |\\n| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |\\n| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports \\\"success\\\" |\\n| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |\\n\\n## Red Flags - STOP\\n\\n- Using \\\"should\\\", \\\"probably\\\", \\\"seems to\\\"\\n- Expressing satisfaction before verification (\\\"Great!\\\", \\\"Perfect!\\\", \\\"Done!\\\", etc.)\\n- About to commit/push/PR without verification\\n- Trusting agent success reports\\n- Relying on partial verification\\n- Thinking \\\"just this once\\\"\\n- Tired and wanting work over\\n- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**\\n\\n## Rationalization Prevention\\n\\n| Excuse | Reality |\\n|--------|---------|\\n| \\\"Should work now\\\" | RUN the verification |\\n| \\\"I'm confident\\\" | Confidence ≠ evidence |\\n| \\\"Just this once\\\" | No exceptions |\\n| \\\"Linter passed\\\" | Linter ≠ compiler |\\n| \\\"Agent said success\\\" | Verify independently |\\n| \\\"I'm tired\\\" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |\\n| \\\"Partial check is enough\\\" | Partial proves nothing |\\n| \\\"Different words so rule doesn't apply\\\" | Spirit over letter |\\n\\n## Key Patterns\\n\\n**Tests:**\\n```\\n✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] \\\"All tests pass\\\"\\n❌ \\\"Should pass now\\\" / \\\"Looks correct\\\"\\n```\\n\\n**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**\\n```\\n✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)\\n❌ \\\"I've written a regression test\\\" (without red-green verification)\\n```\\n\\n**Build:**\\n```\\n✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] \\\"Build passes\\\"\\n❌ \\\"Linter passed\\\" (linter doesn't check compilation)\\n```\\n\\n**Requirements:**\\n```\\n✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion\\n❌ \\\"Tests pass, phase complete\\\"\\n```\\n\\n**Agent delegation:**\\n```\\n✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state\\n❌ Trust agent report\\n```\\n\\n## When To Apply\\n\\n**ALWAYS before:**\\n- ANY variation of success/completion claims\\n- ANY expression of satisfaction\\n- ANY positive statement about work state\\n- Committing, PR creation, task completion\\n- Moving to next task\\n- Delegating to agents\\n\\n**Rule applies to:**\\n- Exact phrases\\n- Paraphrases and synonyms\\n- Implications of success\\n- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness\\n\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_7\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"`using-superpowers` 지침에 따라 구현 전에 설계 의도를 점검하는 `superpowers:brainstorming`과, 이미 작성된 Phase 1 계획을 실행하는 `superpowers:executing-plans`도 적용하겠습니다. 이 스텝은 인터페이스와 금지사항이 이미 확정되어 있으므로 브레인스토밍 결과는 범위를 넓히지 않고 “검증 방식과 최소 표현”을 확인하는 데만 사용합니다. TDD 스킬이 지정한 테스트 작성 규칙과 Codex 도구 참고 문서도 먼저 읽겠습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_8\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var moreSkillPaths3 = [String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-superpowers\\\\references\\\\codex-tools.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\brainstorming\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\executing-plans\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\test-driven-development\\\\writing-good-tests.md`]; for (var p4 of moreSkillPaths3) { nodeRepl.write(`\\\\n===== ${p4} =====\\\\n${await fs3.readFile(p4,'utf8')}\\\\n`); }\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read supporting workflow guidance\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_8\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var moreSkillPaths3 = [String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-superpowers\\\\references\\\\codex-tools.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\brainstorming\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\executing-plans\\\\SKILL.md`, String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\test-driven-development\\\\writing-good-tests.md`]; for (var p4 of moreSkillPaths3) { nodeRepl.write(`\\\\n===== ${p4} =====\\\\n${await fs3.readFile(p4,'utf8')}\\\\n`); }\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read supporting workflow guidance\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"\\n===== C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-superpowers\\\\references\\\\codex-tools.md =====\\n## Subagent dispatch requires multi-agent support\\n\\nAdd to your Codex config (`~/.codex/config.toml`):\\n\\n```toml\\n[features]\\nmulti_agent = true\\n```\\n\\nThis enables `spawn_agent`, `wait_agent`, and `close_agent` for skills like `dispatching-parallel-agents` and `subagent-driven-development`. When using subagent-driven-development, close reviewer subagents when their review returns. Keep each implementer subagent open until its task's review passes — the fix loop resumes the implementer — then close it. If your harness cannot send another message to a spawned agent, dispatch each fix round as a fresh implementer carrying the brief, the report file, and the findings.\\n\\n## Environment Detection\\n\\nSkills that create worktrees or finish branches should detect their\\nenvironment with read-only git commands before proceeding:\\n\\n```bash\\nGIT_DIR=$(cd \\\"$(git rev-parse --git-dir)\\\" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)\\nGIT_COMMON=$(cd \\\"$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)\\\" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)\\nBRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)\\n```\\n\\n- `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` → already in a linked worktree (skip creation)\\n- `BRANCH` empty → detached HEAD (cannot branch/push/PR from sandbox)\\n\\nSee `using-git-worktrees` Step 0 and `finishing-a-development-branch`\\nStep 1 for how each skill uses these signals.\\n\\n## Codex App Finishing\\n\\nWhen the sandbox blocks branch/push operations (detached HEAD in an\\nexternally managed worktree), the agent commits all work and informs\\nthe user to use the App's native controls:\\n\\n- **\\\"Create branch\\\"** — names the branch, then commit/push/PR via App UI\\n- **\\\"Hand off to local\\\"** — transfers work to the user's local checkout\\n\\nThe agent can still run tests, stage files, and output suggested branch\\nnames, commit messages, and PR descriptions for the user to copy.\\n\\n\\n===== C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\brainstorming\\\\SKILL.md =====\\n---\\nname: brainstorming\\ndescription: \\\"You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.\\\"\\n---\\n\\n# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs\\n\\nHelp turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.\\n\\nStart by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.\\n\\n\\nDo NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a design and the user has approved it. This applies to EVERY project regardless of perceived simplicity.\\n\\n\\n## Anti-Pattern: \\\"This Is Too Simple To Need A Design\\\"\\n\\nEvery project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. \\\"Simple\\\" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.\\n\\n## Checklist\\n\\nYou MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:\\n\\n1. **Explore project context** — check files, docs, recent commits\\n2. **Offer the visual companion just-in-time** — NOT upfront. The first time a question would genuinely be clearer shown than described, offer it then (its own message); on approval its browser tab opens for you. If no visual question ever arises, never offer it. See the Visual Companion section below.\\n3. **Ask clarifying questions** — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria\\n4. **Propose 2-3 approaches** — with trade-offs and your recommendation\\n5. **Present design** — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section\\n6. **Write design doc** — save to `docs/superpowers/specs/YYYY-MM-DD--design.md` and commit\\n7. **Spec self-review** — quick inline check for placeholders, contradictions, ambiguity, scope (see below)\\n8. **User reviews written spec** — ask user to review the spec file before proceeding\\n9. **Transition to implementation** — invoke writing-plans skill to create implementation plan\\n\\n## Process Flow\\n\\n```dot\\ndigraph brainstorming {\\n \\\"Explore project context\\\" [shape=box];\\n \\\"Ask clarifying questions\\\" [shape=box];\\n \\\"Propose 2-3 approaches\\\" [shape=box];\\n \\\"Present design sections\\\" [shape=box];\\n \\\"User approves design?\\\" [shape=diamond];\\n \\\"Write design doc\\\" [shape=box];\\n \\\"Spec self-review\\\\n(fix inline)\\\" [shape=box];\\n \\\"User reviews spec?\\\" [shape=diamond];\\n \\\"Invoke writing-plans skill\\\" [shape=doublecircle];\\n\\n \\\"Explore project context\\\" -> \\\"Ask clarifying questions\\\";\\n \\\"Ask clarifying questions\\\" -> \\\"Propose 2-3 approaches\\\";\\n \\\"Propose 2-3 approaches\\\" -> \\\"Present design sections\\\";\\n \\\"Present design sections\\\" -> \\\"User approves design?\\\";\\n \\\"User approves design?\\\" -> \\\"Present design sections\\\" [label=\\\"no, revise\\\"];\\n \\\"User approves design?\\\" -> \\\"Write design doc\\\" [label=\\\"yes\\\"];\\n \\\"Write design doc\\\" -> \\\"Spec self-review\\\\n(fix inline)\\\";\\n \\\"Spec self-review\\\\n(fix inline)\\\" -> \\\"User reviews spec?\\\";\\n \\\"User reviews spec?\\\" -> \\\"Write design doc\\\" [label=\\\"changes requested\\\"];\\n \\\"User reviews spec?\\\" -> \\\"Invoke writing-plans skill\\\" [label=\\\"approved\\\"];\\n}\\n```\\n\\n**The terminal state is invoking writing-plans.** Do NOT invoke frontend-design, mcp-builder, or any other implementation skill. The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans.\\n\\n## The Process\\n\\n**Understanding the idea:**\\n\\n- Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)\\n- Before asking detailed questions, assess scope: if the request describes multiple independent subsystems (e.g., \\\"build a platform with chat, file storage, billing, and analytics\\\"), flag this immediately. Don't spend questions refining details of a project that needs to be decomposed first.\\n- If the project is too large for a single spec, help the user decompose into sub-projects: what are the independent pieces, how do they relate, what order should they be built? Then brainstorm the first sub-project through the normal design flow. Each sub-project gets its own spec → plan → implementation cycle.\\n- For appropriately-scoped projects, ask questions one at a time to refine the idea\\n- Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too\\n- Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions\\n- Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria\\n\\n**Exploring approaches:**\\n\\n- Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs\\n- Present options conversationally with your recommendation and reasoning\\n- Lead with your recommended option and explain why\\n- YAGNI ruthlessly - remove unnecessary features from every approach and design\\n\\n**Presenting the design:**\\n\\n- Once you believe you understand what you're building, present the design\\n- Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced\\n- Ask after each section whether it looks right so far\\n- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing\\n- Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense\\n\\n**Design for isolation and clarity:**\\n\\n- Break the system into smaller units that each have one clear purpose, communicate through well-defined interfaces, and can be understood and tested independently\\n- For each unit, you should be able to answer: what does it do, how do you use it, and what does it depend on?\\n- Can someone understand what a unit does without reading its internals? Can you change the internals without breaking consumers? If not, the boundaries need work.\\n- Smaller, well-bounded units are also easier for you to work with - you reason better about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused. When a file grows large, that's often a signal that it's doing too much.\\n\\n**Working in existing codebases:**\\n\\n- Explore the current structure before proposing changes. Follow existing patterns.\\n- Where existing code has problems that affect the work (e.g., a file that's grown too large, unclear boundaries, tangled responsibilities), include targeted improvements as part of the design - the way a good developer improves code they're working in.\\n- Don't propose unrelated refactoring. Stay focused on what serves the current goal.\\n\\n## After the Design\\n\\n**Documentation:**\\n\\n- Write the validated design (spec) to `docs/superpowers/specs/YYYY-MM-DD--design.md`\\n - (User preferences for spec location override this default)\\n- Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available\\n- Commit the design document to git\\n\\n**Spec Self-Review:**\\nAfter writing the spec document, look at it with fresh eyes:\\n\\n1. **Placeholder scan:** Any \\\"TBD\\\", \\\"TODO\\\", incomplete sections, or vague requirements? Fix them.\\n2. **Internal consistency:** Do any sections contradict each other? Does the architecture match the feature descriptions?\\n3. **Scope check:** Is this focused enough for a single implementation plan, or does it need decomposition?\\n4. **Ambiguity check:** Could any requirement be interpreted two different ways? If so, pick one and make it explicit.\\n\\nFix any issues inline. No need to re-review — just fix and move on.\\n\\n**User Review Gate:**\\nAfter the spec review loop passes, ask the user to review the written spec before proceeding:\\n\\n> \\\"Spec written and committed to ``. Please review it and let me know if you want to make any changes before we start writing out the implementation plan.\\\"\\n\\nWait for the user's response. If they request changes, make them and re-run the spec review loop. Only proceed once the user approves.\\n\\n**Implementation:**\\n\\n- Invoke the writing-plans skill to create a detailed implementation plan\\n- Do NOT invoke any other skill. writing-plans is the next step.\\n\\n## Visual Companion\\n\\nA browser-based companion for showing mockups, diagrams, and visual options during brainstorming. Available as a tool — not a mode. Accepting the companion means it's available for questions that benefit from visual treatment; it does NOT mean every question goes through the browser.\\n\\n**Offering the companion (just-in-time):** Do NOT offer it upfront. Wait until a question would genuinely be clearer shown than told — a real mockup / layout / diagram question, not merely a UI *topic*. The first time that happens, offer it then, as its own message:\\n> \\\"This next part might be easier if I show you — I can put together mockups, diagrams, and comparisons in a browser tab as we go. It's still new and can be token-intensive. Want me to? I'll open it for you.\\\"\\n\\n**This offer MUST be its own message.** Only the offer — no clarifying question, summary, or other content. Wait for the user's response. If they accept, start the server with `--open` so their browser opens to the first screen automatically. If they decline, continue text-only and don't offer again unless they raise it.\\n\\n**Per-question decision:** Even after the user accepts, decide FOR EACH QUESTION whether to use the browser or the terminal. The test: **would the user understand this better by seeing it than reading it?**\\n\\n- **Use the browser** for content that IS visual — mockups, wireframes, layout comparisons, architecture diagrams, side-by-side visual designs\\n- **Use the terminal** for content that is text — requirements questions, conceptual choices, tradeoff lists, A/B/C/D text options, scope decisions\\n\\nA question about a UI topic is not automatically a visual question. \\\"What does personality mean in this context?\\\" is a conceptual question — use the terminal. \\\"Which wizard layout works better?\\\" is a visual question — use the browser.\\n\\nIf they agree to the companion, read the detailed guide before proceeding:\\n`skills/brainstorming/visual-companion.md`\\n\\n\\n===== C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\executing-plans\\\\SKILL.md =====\\n---\\nname: executing-plans\\ndescription: Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints\\n---\\n\\n# Executing Plans\\n\\n## Overview\\n\\nLoad plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.\\n\\n**Announce at start:** \\\"I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan.\\\"\\n\\n**Note:** Tell your human partner that Superpowers works much better with access to subagents (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Codex App, Copilot CLI, and Gemini CLI all qualify; see the per-platform tool refs in `../using-superpowers/references/`). If subagents are available, use superpowers:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.\\n\\n## The Process\\n\\n### Step 1: Load and Review Plan\\n1. Ensure an isolated workspace: use superpowers:using-git-worktrees to create one or verify the existing one\\n2. Read plan file\\n3. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan\\n4. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting\\n5. If no concerns: Create todos for the plan items and proceed\\n\\n### Step 2: Execute Tasks\\n\\nFor each task:\\n1. Mark as in_progress\\n2. Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)\\n3. Run verifications as specified\\n4. Mark as completed\\n\\n### Step 3: Complete Development\\n\\nAfter all tasks complete and verified:\\n- Announce: \\\"I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work.\\\"\\n- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\\n- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice\\n\\n## When to Stop and Ask for Help\\n\\n**STOP executing immediately when:**\\n- Hit a blocker (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)\\n- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting\\n- You don't understand an instruction\\n- Verification fails repeatedly\\n\\n**Ask for clarification rather than guessing.**\\n\\n## When to Revisit Earlier Steps\\n\\n**Return to Review (Step 1) when:**\\n- Partner updates the plan based on your feedback\\n- Fundamental approach needs rethinking\\n\\n**Don't force through blockers** - stop and ask.\\n\\n## Remember\\n- Review plan critically first\\n- Follow plan steps exactly\\n- Don't skip verifications\\n- Reference skills when plan says to\\n- Stop when blocked, don't guess\\n- Never start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent\\n\\n\\n===== C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\test-driven-development\\\\writing-good-tests.md =====\\n# Writing Good Tests\\n\\n**Load this reference when:** writing or changing tests, adding mocks, or\\nadding cleanup/helper methods for tests.\\n\\n## Overview\\n\\nA test exists to catch a specific break. Two principles govern everything\\nhere:\\n\\n```\\n1. Every test names the break it catches\\n2. Every test exercises the real thing\\n```\\n\\nStrict TDD produces both naturally: a test written first and watched\\nfailing against real code has already proven it can fail, and only earns\\na mock when the real dependency proves slow or external.\\n\\n## Principle 1: Name the Break\\n\\nBefore writing the test body, answer: **what production change should\\nmake this test fail — and is that change a bug or a decision?** A test\\nearns its place by catching a wrong branch, missing side effect, wrong\\nargument, boundary case, or broken contract.\\n\\n**Derive expectations independently.** Use literals and hand-checked\\nfixtures; table-driven tests with literal `want` values are the preferred\\nshape. An expectation computed by the code under test — or its helpers —\\npasses no matter what that code does:\\n\\n```typescript\\n// ❌ Mirror assertion: the same builder computes both sides — always true\\nconst expected = buildSearchQuery({ tag: 'urgent' });\\nexpect(buildSearchQuery({ tag: 'urgent' })).toBe(expected);\\n\\n// ✅ Hand-derived literal\\nexpect(buildSearchQuery({ tag: 'urgent' })).toBe('tag:\\\"urgent\\\"');\\n```\\n\\n**No change detectors.** If only intentional decisions can fail a test —\\na constant's value, exact message wording, private structure — it fires\\non redesign and sleeps through bugs. Test the behavior that depends on\\nthe decision: not `expect(MAX_RETRIES).toBe(5)` but \\\"a failing call is\\nretried 5 times and the 6th attempt never happens.\\\"\\n\\n**Behavior, not text.** Asserting that a script, skill, or config\\ncontains an exact line proves only that the source is the source. Run\\nscripts against controlled inputs and assert outputs, side effects, or\\nexit codes. Documents that instruct agents are tested by the consuming\\nagent's behavior (superpowers:writing-skills); prose for humans earns no\\ntest at all.\\n\\n**Your code, not the framework.** Test the contract your code makes at\\nits boundaries — the route you register, the query you emit, the payload\\nyou produce. Upstream mechanics are their maintainers' tests to write\\n(the classic: asserting your router invokes a registered handler — that\\nis the framework's test, not yours). When upstream behavior genuinely\\nsurprised you, write one narrow characterization test naming the\\nassumption. The same boundary applies inside your code: constructors,\\ngetters, constants, and trivial forwarding earn tests only when they\\nvalidate, normalize, default, derive, enforce, or cause side effects —\\notherwise assert the first consumer-visible result that depends on them.\\n\\n### Gate Function\\n\\n```\\nBEFORE writing the test body:\\n Name the production change that would make this test fail.\\n\\n Cannot name one → redesign around an observable behavior\\n \\\"The source text changed\\\" → run the artifact and assert its effects\\n Only intentional decisions → change detector; test the behavior\\n that depends on the decision\\n\\n Confirm the expected value is derived without the code under test.\\n IF it reuses the code's logic or helpers:\\n Replace it with a literal or hand-checked fixture\\n```\\n\\n## Principle 2: Exercise the Real Thing\\n\\n**The mock earns no assertions.** A mock assertion passes when the mock\\nis present and fails when it is absent — it says nothing about the\\ncomponent. Assert the real component's behavior; if the mock is what you\\nare checking, unmock it or delete the assertion.\\n\\n```typescript\\n// ✅ Real behavior\\nexpect(screen.getByRole('navigation')).toBeInTheDocument();\\n\\n// ❌ Mock existence\\nexpect(screen.getByTestId('sidebar-mock')).toBeInTheDocument();\\n```\\n\\n**your human partner's correction:** \\\"Are we testing the behavior of a\\nmock?\\\"\\n\\n**Mock at the right level.** Learn every side effect of the real method\\nbefore replacing it; mock the slow or external operation and keep what\\nthe test depends on real. When unsure, run the test against the real\\nimplementation first and observe what actually needs to happen.\\n\\n```typescript\\n// ❌ The mock swallows the config write that duplicate detection reads\\nvi.mock('ToolCatalog', () => ({\\n discoverAndCacheTools: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined)\\n}));\\n\\n// ✅ Mock only the slow server startup; the config write stays real\\nvi.mock('MCPServerManager');\\n```\\n\\n**Make doubles specific.** When arguments, call counts, or ordering are\\npart of the contract, assert them — a fake that accepts anything verifies\\nnothing. Give each branch (success, error, malformed) its own fixture or\\nspy, so the wrong branch cannot satisfy the expectation.\\n\\n**Mirror real data completely.** Mock the complete structure as it exists\\nin reality — all documented fields — not just the ones your test reads.\\nPartial mocks fail silently when downstream code reads an omitted field:\\nthe test passes while integration breaks.\\n\\n**Production classes carry production methods only.** Cleanup that only\\ntests need lives in test utilities, never as a `destroy()` on the\\nproduction class. Ask: is this method called only from tests? Does this\\nclass own this resource's lifecycle? Wrong answers → test utility.\\n\\n**Prefer real components over complex mocks.** When mock setup outgrows\\nthe test logic, mocks miss methods the real components have, or tests\\nbreak when the mock changes, switch to an integration test with real\\ncomponents. **your human partner's question:** \\\"Do we need to be using a\\nmock here?\\\"\\n\\n### Gate Function\\n\\n```\\nBEFORE adding a mock or test helper:\\n List the real method's side effects; keep the ones the test\\n depends on real — mock the slow/external level below them.\\n\\n Mock responses mirror the complete real structure.\\n\\n A method only tests call lives in test utilities, not production.\\n\\n About to assert on the mock itself?\\n Unmock it or delete the assertion.\\n```\\n\\n## Tests Ship With the Implementation\\n\\nThe TDD cycle — failing test, minimal implementation, refactor — is what\\n\\\"complete\\\" means. Ship the tests the behavior needs and only those:\\ntrivial code and human prose earn none, and a test written to satisfy\\nprocess costs maintenance forever.\\n\\n## The Mutation Check\\n\\nBefore finishing, mentally mutate the production code; at least one test\\nshould fail for each realistic mutation:\\n\\n- Wrong constant or argument\\n- Wrong branch handler\\n- Missing state change or side effect\\n- Empty or default return\\n- Missing validation for zero, empty, nil, unauthorized, or malformed input\\n\\nA mutation nothing catches marks the behavior as unprotected — or the\\ntest as tautological.\\n\\n## Quick Reference\\n\\n| When you... | Do |\\n|-------------|-----|\\n| Write any test | Name the break it catches — a bug, not a decision |\\n| Build an expected value | Derive it by hand; never with the code under test |\\n| Test a script or document | Run it / pressure-test its consumer; never grep its text |\\n| Reach for a dependency test | Test your boundary contract, not their documented mechanics |\\n| Want to assert on a mocked element | Test the real component, or unmock it |\\n| Are about to mock a method | Learn its side effects; mock the slow/external level |\\n| Build a mock response | Mirror the real structure completely |\\n| Need cleanup only tests use | Put it in test utilities |\\n| Watch mock setup balloon | Switch to an integration test with real components |\\n| Finish a test file | Run the mutation check |\\n\\n## Warning Signs\\n\\n- Setup and assertion share the same object, guaranteeing equality\\n- The test can fail only through a panic, crash, or missing selector\\n- The test fails on every intentional change, never on accidental breakage\\n- Expected values are hidden behind loops, builders, or helpers\\n- The test greps source text, or asserts a removed symbol stays removed\\n- The test would still matter if only the framework remained\\n- The test exists for coverage, checking no side effect or outcome\\n- An assertion checks a `*-mock` test ID, or fails if you remove the mock\\n- A method is called only from test files\\n- Mock setup is more than half the test, or you can't explain why the mock is needed\\n- Mocking \\\"just to be safe\\\"\\n\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_9\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"사용자가 제공한 Step 3 문서가 이미 승인된 설계·구현 계획이며, 새 설계 문서 생성과 커밋은 이번 작업 규칙에서 명시적으로 금지되어 있습니다. 따라서 브레인스토밍의 별도 문서/승인 루프는 기존 승인 산출물로 충족된 것으로 보고, 현재 worktree와 실제 파일이 그 계획과 일치하는지만 검토하겠습니다. 성공 기준은 (1) 잘못된 typed ID 변환이 컴파일되지 않음, (2) 음수 ID와 nonfinite `Vec3`가 `Status` 오류로 표현됨, (3) diagnostic이 source를 보존함, (4) 지정 focused/전체 CTest와 외부-header 경계 확인 통과입니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_10\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var repo3 = String.raw`C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap`; var reqFiles3 = ['AGENTS.md','docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-29-fesa-phase-1.md','CMakeLists.txt','tests/CMakeLists.txt','include/fesa/core/version.hpp','tests/unit/dependencies/dependency_smoke_test.cpp','phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json','.harness/config.json']; for (var rel3 of reqFiles3) { var full3 = repo3+'\\\\\\\\'+rel3.replaceAll('/','\\\\\\\\'); nodeRepl.write(`\\\\n===== ${rel3} =====\\\\n${await fs3.readFile(full3,'utf8')}\\\\n`); }\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Inspect plan and existing project files\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_10\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var repo3 = String.raw`C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap`; var reqFiles3 = ['AGENTS.md','docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-29-fesa-phase-1.md','CMakeLists.txt','tests/CMakeLists.txt','include/fesa/core/version.hpp','tests/unit/dependencies/dependency_smoke_test.cpp','phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json','.harness/config.json']; for (var rel3 of reqFiles3) { var full3 = repo3+'\\\\\\\\'+rel3.replaceAll('/','\\\\\\\\'); nodeRepl.write(`\\\\n===== ${rel3} =====\\\\n${await fs3.readFile(full3,'utf8')}\\\\n`); }\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Inspect plan and existing project files\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"\\n===== AGENTS.md =====\\n# FESA Repository Instructions\\r\\n\\r\\n## 적용 범위와 기준 문서\\r\\n\\r\\n이 파일은 저장소 전체에 적용한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n- 제품 요구사항과 Phase 1 수용 조건은 `docs/PRD.md`를 따른다.\\r\\n- 모듈 경계와 데이터 흐름은 `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`를 따른다.\\r\\n- 기술 선택과 트레이드오프는 `docs/ADR.md`를 따른다.\\r\\n- Harness 실행 방법은 `docs/HARNESS.md`와 `.agents/skills/harness/SKILL.md`를 따른다.\\r\\n- 실제 빌드와 테스트 명령은 `.harness/config.json`과 CMake Preset을 우선한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## 기술 기준\\r\\n\\r\\n- 언어 표준: C++20\\r\\n- 컴파일러: Visual Studio 2026 MSVC v145\\n- 대상 플랫폼: Windows x64\\r\\n- 빌드 및 테스트: CMake, CMake Presets, CTest, GoogleTest/GoogleMock\\r\\n- 수치 연산 및 희소 직접해법: Intel oneAPI MKL\\r\\n- 요소 계산 및 조립 병렬화: Intel oneAPI TBB\\r\\n- 결과 저장: HDF5\\r\\n- 외부 라이브러리는 개발 환경에 사전 설치된 버전을 사용한다.\\r\\n- FESA는 단위 변환을 수행하지 않는다. 입력은 일관 단위계를 사용해야 한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## Phase 1 범위\\r\\n\\r\\n- Abaqus `.inp` 제한 부분집합으로 작성된 flat/orphan mesh 또는 좌표변환이 없는\\r\\n 단일 Part/Assembly/Instance 모델을 읽는다.\\r\\n- 단일 선형 정적 `*STEP`만 실행한다.\\r\\n- 절점당 6자유도를 갖는 2절점 3D Isoparametric Timoshenko Beam만 구현한다.\\r\\n- 등방성 선형 탄성, 일반 단면, `*BOUNDARY`, `*CLOAD`만 지원한다.\\r\\n- 다른 요소, 다중 step, 여러 Instance, Instance 좌표변환, MPC, 분포하중, 비선형,\\r\\n 동적, 모달, 좌굴 및 열전달을 선행 구현하지 않는다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## 아키텍처 규칙\\r\\n\\r\\n- public header는 `include/fesa/`, 구현은 `src/fesa/`, 테스트는 `tests/`에 둔다.\\r\\n- `core`, `model`, `fem`, `elements`는 Abaqus, MKL, TBB 및 HDF5 API에 의존하지 않는다.\\r\\n- `io/abaqus`는 입력 syntax와 semantic mapping만 담당하며 해석 알고리즘을 알지 않는다.\\r\\n- `model`에는 Abaqus keyword 문자열 대신 solver semantic model을 저장한다.\\r\\n- 자유도와 equation ID는 `DofManager`가 소유한다. `Node`나 `Element`에 분산 저장하지 않는다.\\r\\n- 외부 라이브러리 handle과 resource는 adapter와 RAII wrapper 내부에 가둔다.\\r\\n- 테스트 helper가 production parser, model validation 또는 solver 경로를 우회하지 않게 한다.\\r\\n- 실제 두 번째 구현이 생기기 전에는 범용 registry, 빈 미래 클래스 또는 디렉터리를 만들지 않는다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## 개발 및 검증 절차\\r\\n\\r\\n1. 요구조건과 완료 기준을 먼저 문서화한다.\\r\\n2. 정식화의 출처, 가정, 좌표계, 부호 및 적분 규칙을 기록한다.\\r\\n3. 입력, semantic model 및 HDF5 계약을 구현 전에 확정한다.\\r\\n4. 실패하는 단위·통합·reference 테스트와 모델을 먼저 작성한다.\\r\\n5. 테스트를 통과하는 최소 코드를 구현한다.\\r\\n6. 해석해, physics sanity 및 Abaqus 2024 골든 결과와 비교한다.\\r\\n7. 물리량별 tolerance를 통과한 뒤에만 기능 완료와 내부 배포를 선언한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n추가 규칙:\\r\\n\\r\\n- 수직 파이프라인을 먼저 연결하되 임시 가짜 강성행렬은 사용하지 않는다.\\r\\n- 같은 입력과 설정의 병렬 조립 결과는 재현 가능해야 한다.\\r\\n- 전단강성이 생략되면 \\\\(A_{sy}=A_{sz}=5A/6\\\\)과 `SCF=0`을 Phase 1 기본값으로\\r\\n 적용한다.\\r\\n- reference 비교는 metadata 없이 요청된 물리량과 CSV 경로를 명시한다. 현재\\r\\n 캔틸레버 샘플은 변위와 반력을 비교하며 요소 내력과 도심 응력 비교 루틴은\\r\\n synthetic CSV로 검증한다.\\r\\n- 새 MSVC 빌드 경고를 추가하지 않는다.\\r\\n- 변경은 요청 범위에 한정하고 Conventional Commits 형식의 메시지를 사용한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## 검증 명령\\r\\n\\r\\nHarness Python 검증:\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\nuv run --with pytest python -m pytest -v -rs\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n테스트가 0개 수집된 실행은 성공으로 인정하지 않는다.\\r\\n\\r\\nSolver bootstrap 이후에는 `.harness/config.json`에 지정된 CMake Preset을 사용한다.\\r\\nPreset이 없을 때만 다음 격리 build directory를 사용한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake -S . -B .harness/build -A x64\\r\\ncmake --build .harness/build --config Debug\\r\\nctest --test-dir .harness/build -C Debug --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nHarness phase 실행:\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\npython scripts/execute.py \\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n사용자가 명시적으로 원격 push를 요청한 경우에만 다음을 사용한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\npython scripts/execute.py --push\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\n\\n===== docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-29-fesa-phase-1.md =====\\n# FESA Phase 1 Implementation Plan\\r\\n\\r\\n> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.\\r\\n\\r\\n**Goal:** Build and internally qualify a C++20/MSVC linear-static finite-element solver that reads the agreed Abaqus `.inp` subset, solves 2-node 3D Timoshenko Beam models, and writes self-contained HDF5 results.\\r\\n\\r\\n**Architecture:** Implement one end-to-end vertical slice first, then complete the input, numerical, parallel, result, and reference-verification contracts behind the module boundaries in `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`. Keep the semantic model independent of Abaqus syntax and isolate oneMKL, oneTBB, and HDF5 behind adapters.\\r\\n\\r\\n**Tech Stack:** C++20, Visual Studio 2026 MSVC v145 x64, CMake/CMake Presets/CTest, GoogleTest/GoogleMock, Intel oneAPI MKL PARDISO, Intel oneAPI TBB, HDF5 C API, Python 3 Harness.\\n\\r\\n## Global Constraints\\r\\n\\r\\n- Only the Phase 1 scope in `docs/PRD.md` may be implemented.\\r\\n- Public headers live under `include/fesa/`; implementations live under `src/fesa/`; tests live under `tests/`.\\r\\n- Write a failing test before every production behavior change.\\r\\n- Do not add a fake stiffness matrix or a test-only solver path.\\r\\n- Do not introduce empty future modules, a generic registry, MPC, iterative solvers, nonlinear state, or additional element types.\\r\\n- FESA performs no unit conversion.\\r\\n- Abaqus inputs may use a flat mesh or one untransformed Part/Assembly/Instance.\\r\\n- When transverse shear stiffness is omitted, use \\\\(A_{sy}=A_{sz}=5A/6\\\\) and `SCF=0`.\\r\\n- Reference comparison requests name their quantities and CSV paths; no per-model metadata file is required.\\r\\n- A pipeline milestone is not a numerically qualified release.\\r\\n- No new MSVC warnings are allowed.\\r\\n- The existing Harness contract in `docs/HARNESS.md` and `.agents/skills/harness/SKILL.md` remains unchanged.\\r\\n\\r\\n## Environment Audit\\r\\n\\r\\nThe planning environment currently has:\\r\\n\\r\\n- CMake 4.4.0\\n- Visual Studio Community 2026 at `C:/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio/18/Community`\\n- MSVC v145 tools at `C:/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio/18/Community/VC/Tools/MSVC/14.51.36231`\\n- CMake generator `Visual Studio 18 2026`\\n- oneMKL CMake package at `C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/lib/cmake/mkl`\\n- oneTBB CMake package at `C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/lib/cmake/tbb`\\n- HDF5 2.1.1 CMake package at `C:/Program Files/HDF_Group/HDF5/2.1.1/cmake`\\n- GoogleTest/GoogleMock v1.17 VS2026/v145 x64 package at\\n `C:/Users/baram/AppData/Local/FESA/dependencies/googletest-1.17.0-v145-x64-crt`\\n- `MSBuild.exe` at `C:/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio/18/Community/MSBuild/Current/Bin/MSBuild.exe`\\n\\nThe solver bootstrap must stop as `blocked` rather than downloading packages if a dependency\\nrequired by its current step is unavailable.\\n\\r\\n## Required Research Record\\r\\n\\r\\nBefore the related production task begins, record the relevant equations,\\r\\nassumptions, API contracts, and FESA decisions from these sources:\\r\\n\\r\\n- K. J. Bathe, *Finite Element Procedures*, 2nd edition: finite-element\\r\\n discretization, assembly, constraints, and verification.\\r\\n- T. J. R. Hughes, *The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic\\r\\n Finite Element Analysis*: variational formulation and numerical integration.\\r\\n- K. J. Bathe and S. Bolourchi, “Large Displacement Analysis of\\r\\n Three-Dimensional Beam Structures,” 1979: three-dimensional isoparametric\\r\\n Beam coordinates and transformations. Phase 1 uses only the linearized\\r\\n subset.\\r\\n- T. J. R. Hughes, R. L. Taylor, and W. Kanoknukulchai, “A Simple and\\r\\n Efficient Finite Element for Plate Bending,” 1977: selective reduced\\r\\n integration rationale. Do not copy its plate kinematics into the Beam\\r\\n formulation.\\r\\n- [Abaqus 2024—Choosing a Beam Element](https://docs.software.vt.edu/abaqusv2024/English/SIMACAEELMRefMap/simaelm-c-beamelem.htm):\\r\\n B31 shear-flexible behavior and slenderness compensation.\\r\\n- [Abaqus 2024—BEAM GENERAL SECTION](https://docs.software.vt.edu/abaqusv2024/English/SIMACAEKEYRefMap/simakey-r-beamgeneralsection.htm):\\r\\n supported general-section data and orientation.\\r\\n- [Intel oneMKL PARDISO reference](https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/onemkl/developer-reference-c/2025-0/pardiso.html):\\r\\n matrix type, CSR indexing, phases, checks, and error codes.\\r\\n- [oneTBB reduction guide](https://uxlfoundation.github.io/oneTBB/main/tbb_userguide/design_patterns/Reduction.html):\\r\\n deterministic floating-point reduction.\\r\\n- [HDF5 data model](https://support.hdfgroup.org/documentation/hdf5/latest/_intro_h_d_f5.html):\\r\\n groups, datasets, dataspaces, and attributes.\\r\\n- [CMake FindHDF5](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/FindHDF5.html):\\r\\n installed C-library discovery and imported targets.\\r\\n\\r\\n`docs/formulation/timoshenko-beam-3d.md`, `docs/HDF5_SCHEMA.md`, and\\r\\n`docs/VALIDATION.md` must cite the applicable source and state where FESA\\r\\nintentionally differs.\\r\\n\\r\\n## Harness Phase Map\\r\\n\\r\\n| Order | Harness phase | Plan tasks | Independent deliverable |\\r\\n| ---: | --- | --- | --- |\\r\\n| 0 | `solver-bootstrap` | Harness baseline, 1-2 | Harness self-tests, reproducible C++20 build, dependency smoke tests, core IDs and diagnostics |\\n| 1 | `domain-and-input-skeleton` | 3-4 | Flat or single-Instance B31 input becomes an immutable normalized `Domain` |\\r\\n| 2 | `fem-and-beam-kernel` | 5-6 | Real Timoshenko Beam local stiffness with analytical sanity tests |\\r\\n| 3 | `equation-and-linear-solve` | 7-8 | Deterministic serial CSR system solved by PARDISO |\\r\\n| 4 | `results-and-pipeline` | 9-10 | CLI runs one deck end-to-end and writes readable HDF5 |\\r\\n| 5 | `abaqus-subset-completion` | 11 | Full agreed scoped keyword, set, material, section, load, and BC subset |\\r\\n| 6 | `deterministic-parallel-assembly` | 12 | oneTBB assembly matches serial output across thread counts |\\r\\n| 7 | `result-contract-completion` | 13 | Complete self-contained HDF5 schema and Beam result recovery |\\r\\n| 8 | `beam-reference-qualification` | 14 | Analytical suite and available Abaqus displacement/reaction data pass tolerance |\\r\\n| 9 | `internal-release` | 15 | Debug/Release validation, 100k-DOF benchmark, install tree, reports |\\r\\n\\r\\nCreate `phases/index.json`, phase indexes, and step files only after this plan and its phase split are approved.\\r\\n\\r\\n## Planned File Map\\r\\n\\r\\n```text\\r\\nCMakeLists.txt root targets and project policies\\r\\nCMakePresets.json windows-debug/windows-release workflows\\r\\ncmake/FesaDependencies.cmake installed dependency discovery\\r\\n.harness/config.json Harness CMake preset selection\\r\\ninclude/fesa/core/ IDs, vectors, source locations, diagnostics\\r\\ninclude/fesa/model/ immutable semantic entities and Domain\\r\\ninclude/fesa/io/abaqus/ deck records, parser, semantic mapper\\r\\ninclude/fesa/fem/ quadrature, shape functions, frames, DOFs\\r\\ninclude/fesa/elements/beam/ Beam3D2 input, contribution, recovery contract\\r\\ninclude/fesa/assembly/ symmetric COO/CSR and assembly\\r\\ninclude/fesa/constraints/ essential-BC elimination and reconstruction\\r\\ninclude/fesa/solvers/linear/ backend contract and PARDISO adapter\\r\\ninclude/fesa/results/ step/frame/field/diagnostic result model\\r\\ninclude/fesa/io/hdf5/ schema constants, writer, reader\\r\\ninclude/fesa/analysis/ analysis lifecycle and linear-static procedure\\r\\ninclude/fesa/validation/ comparison metrics and CSV mapping\\r\\nsrc/fesa/ implementations mirroring public modules\\r\\nsrc/fesa/cli/main.cpp thin `fesa` command-line executable\\r\\ntests/unit/ single-module behavior\\r\\ntests/integration/ public input-to-output path\\r\\ntests/reference/ FESA HDF5 to golden CSV comparisons\\r\\ntests/fixtures/ small invalid and valid decks\\r\\nreference/cantilever beam/ supplied Abaqus input and available golden CSV data\\r\\ndocs/formulation/ signed-off equations and conventions\\r\\ndocs/HDF5_SCHEMA.md versioned output contract\\r\\ndocs/VALIDATION.md benchmark matrix and qualification result\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 1: CMake, Installed Dependencies, and Test Bootstrap\\n\\n**Files:**\\n\\n- Create before CMake bootstrap: `tests/harness/test_config.py`\\n- Create before CMake bootstrap: `tests/harness/test_discovery.py`\\n- Create before CMake bootstrap: `tests/harness/test_process.py`\\n- Create: `CMakeLists.txt`\\n- Create: `CMakePresets.json`\\r\\n- Create: `cmake/FesaDependencies.cmake`\\r\\n- Create: `.harness/config.json`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/core/version.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/core/version.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/cli/main.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/CMakeLists.txt`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/core/version_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: `.gitignore`\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Produces: `std::string_view fesa::version() noexcept`\\r\\n- Produces CMake targets: `fesa_core`, `fesa_cli`, `fesa_unit_tests`\\r\\n- Produces presets: `windows-debug`, `windows-release`\\r\\n- Later tasks consume the common warning and include-directory policies.\\n\\nBefore the CMake task, add characterization tests for the existing Harness\\nconfiguration, project discovery, and validation-result contracts. This\\nprecondition makes the repository-level pytest command collect at least one\\ntest without changing production Harness behavior.\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Verify required installed packages without changing the machine**\\r\\n\\r\\nRun:\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --version\\n& \\\"${env:ProgramFiles(x86)}\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio\\\\Installer\\\\vswhere.exe\\\" `\\n -latest -products * -requires Microsoft.VisualStudio.Component.VC.Tools.x86.x64 `\\n -property installationPath\\nTest-Path \\\"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio\\\\18\\\\Community\\\\MSBuild\\\\Current\\\\Bin\\\\MSBuild.exe\\\"\\nGet-ChildItem \\\"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio\\\\18\\\\Community\\\\VC\\\\Tools\\\\MSVC\\\" -Directory\\nGet-ChildItem \\\"C:\\\\Program Files (x86)\\\\Intel\\\\oneAPI\\\" -Recurse -Filter MKLConfig.cmake\\nGet-ChildItem \\\"C:\\\\Program Files (x86)\\\\Intel\\\\oneAPI\\\" -Recurse -Filter TBBConfig.cmake\\nGet-ChildItem \\\"C:\\\\Program Files\\\" -Recurse -Filter hdf5-config.cmake\\nGet-ChildItem \\\"C:\\\\Program Files\\\" -Recurse -Filter GTestConfig.cmake\\n```\\n\\nExpected: Visual Studio 2026/MSVC v145, oneMKL, oneTBB, HDF5, and GoogleTest\\nare all discoverable before the step that consumes each dependency. If a required item is\\nmissing, mark that Harness step `blocked` and name it; do not download it.\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Write the failing version test**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\n#include \\r\\n#include \\r\\n\\r\\nTEST(Version, ReportsPhaseOneSemanticVersion) {\\r\\n EXPECT_EQ(fesa::version(), \\\"0.1.0\\\");\\r\\n}\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Add configure files and verify the test fails before implementation**\\r\\n\\r\\n`cmake/FesaDependencies.cmake` must set the oneMKL choices before package discovery:\\r\\n\\r\\n```cmake\\r\\ncmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.30)\\r\\n\\r\\nset(MKL_LINK dynamic)\\r\\nset(MKL_THREADING tbb_thread)\\r\\nset(MKL_INTERFACE lp64)\\r\\nfind_package(MKL CONFIG REQUIRED)\\r\\nfind_package(TBB CONFIG REQUIRED COMPONENTS tbb)\\r\\nfind_package(HDF5 REQUIRED COMPONENTS C)\\r\\nfind_package(GTest CONFIG REQUIRED)\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nLink `MKL::MKL`, `TBB::tbb`, `HDF5::HDF5`, and `GTest::gtest_main` only to targets that use them. Configure and build:\\r\\nCompile FESA targets with `/W4 /permissive- /EHsc`; do not apply FESA warning\\r\\nflags to imported targets.\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --preset windows-debug\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nExpected: build fails because `fesa::version()` has no definition.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Implement the minimum version API and thin CLI**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nnamespace fesa {\\r\\nstd::string_view version() noexcept;\\r\\n}\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nThe CLI accepts only `--version` in this task. Any other command prints usage and returns a nonzero exit code.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Run focused and full bootstrap validation**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\n.\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa.exe --version\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nExpected: one test passes and the CLI prints `0.1.0`.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 6: Commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ngit add CMakeLists.txt CMakePresets.json cmake .harness/config.json include/fesa/core/version.hpp src/fesa/core/version.cpp src/fesa/cli/main.cpp tests/CMakeLists.txt tests/unit/core/version_test.cpp .gitignore\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"build: bootstrap FESA CMake project\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 2: Core IDs, Vectors, Source Locations, and Diagnostics\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/core/entity_id.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/core/vec3.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/core/source_location.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/core/diagnostic.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/core/entity_id_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/core/vec3_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/core/diagnostic_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: `CMakeLists.txt`\\r\\n- Modify: `tests/CMakeLists.txt`\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\ntemplate\\r\\nclass EntityId final {\\r\\npublic:\\r\\n explicit constexpr EntityId(std::int64_t value);\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] constexpr std::int64_t value() const noexcept;\\r\\n auto operator<=>(const EntityId&) const = default;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct Vec3 final {\\r\\n double x;\\r\\n double y;\\r\\n double z;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] bool is_finite(Vec3 value) noexcept;\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct SourceLocation final {\\r\\n std::filesystem::path file;\\r\\n std::size_t line;\\r\\n std::size_t column;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nenum class DiagnosticStage {\\r\\n io, lexical, syntax, semantic, model, equation, solver, results\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct Diagnostic final {\\r\\n DiagnosticStage stage;\\r\\n std::string code;\\r\\n std::string message;\\r\\n std::optional source;\\r\\n std::optional entity_id;\\r\\n};\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nCover negative/zero entity-ID rejection, typed-ID non-interchangeability at compile time, finite `Vec3` validation, and full diagnostic context preservation.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Run focused tests and confirm compile or assertion failure**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Core\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nExpected: failure because the core types do not exist.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Implement only the declared core types**\\r\\n\\r\\nUse `double` for all Phase 1 real values and `std::int64_t` for external Abaqus IDs. Do not introduce a unit library, generic error monad, matrix class, or logging framework.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Run all tests**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nExpected: all tests pass with no new MSVC warnings.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/core tests/unit/core CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(core): add typed IDs and diagnostics\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 3: Immutable Semantic Domain\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/ids.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/entity_origin.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/node.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/material.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/beam_section.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/beam_element.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/entity_set.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/step_definition.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/domain.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/model/domain_builder.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/model/domain.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/model/domain_builder.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/model/domain_builder_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: root and test CMake files\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nusing NodeId = EntityId;\\r\\nusing ElementId = EntityId;\\r\\nusing MaterialId = EntityId;\\r\\nusing SectionId = EntityId;\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct EntityOrigin final {\\r\\n std::string part_name;\\r\\n std::string instance_name;\\r\\n std::int64_t local_label;\\r\\n};\\r\\nstruct Node final { NodeId id; EntityOrigin origin; Vec3 position; };\\r\\nstruct IsotropicElastic final { MaterialId id; std::string name; double young; double poisson; };\\r\\nstruct BeamSection final {\\r\\n SectionId id;\\r\\n std::string name;\\r\\n double area;\\r\\n double iy;\\r\\n double iz;\\r\\n double torsion_j;\\r\\n double shear_area_y;\\r\\n double shear_area_z;\\r\\n Vec3 orientation;\\r\\n std::vector> recovery_points;\\r\\n};\\r\\nstruct BeamElement final {\\r\\n ElementId id;\\r\\n EntityOrigin origin;\\r\\n std::array nodes;\\r\\n MaterialId material;\\r\\n SectionId section;\\r\\n};\\r\\nstruct NodeSet final { std::string name; std::vector members; };\\r\\nstruct ElementSet final { std::string name; std::vector members; };\\r\\nstruct PrescribedDof final { NodeId node; std::uint8_t dof; double value; };\\r\\nstruct NodalLoad final { NodeId node; std::array values; };\\r\\nstruct StepDefinition final {\\r\\n std::string name;\\r\\n std::vector prescribed_dofs;\\r\\n std::vector nodal_loads;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nclass Domain final {\\r\\npublic:\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] std::span nodes() const noexcept;\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] std::span beam_elements() const noexcept;\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] const Node& node(NodeId id) const;\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] const Node& node(const EntityOrigin& origin) const;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct DomainBuildResult final {\\r\\n std::optional domain;\\r\\n std::vector diagnostics;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nclass DomainBuilder final {\\r\\npublic:\\r\\n void add_node(Node value);\\r\\n void add_material(IsotropicElastic value);\\r\\n void add_section(BeamSection value);\\r\\n void add_beam_element(BeamElement value);\\r\\n void add_node_set(NodeSet value);\\r\\n void add_element_set(ElementSet value);\\r\\n void set_step(StepDefinition value);\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] DomainBuildResult build() &&;\\r\\n};\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n`DomainBuilder::build()` returns either one immutable `Domain` or a nonempty\\r\\ndiagnostic list. It must resolve every reference and reject duplicate internal\\r\\nIDs, duplicate `(instance_name, local_label)` origins, nonfinite values, invalid\\r\\nmaterial constants, invalid section properties, zero-length elements, missing\\r\\nassignments, and invalid orientation vectors. Empty Part/Instance names denote\\r\\nthe flat global scope.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing builder tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nWrite one valid two-node domain test and one test for every rejection listed above.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Run the model tests and confirm failure**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Domain\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Implement the minimum immutable storage and validation**\\r\\n\\r\\nPreserve external IDs and create private dense lookup maps. Do not store equation numbers in `Node` or `BeamElement`.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Run all tests and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/model src/fesa/model tests/unit/model CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(model): add immutable beam domain\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 4: Minimal Scoped Abaqus Deck to Domain\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/io/abaqus/deck_record.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/io/abaqus/parser.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/io/abaqus/semantic_mapper.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/io/abaqus/parser.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/io/abaqus/semantic_mapper.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/fixtures/abaqus/minimal_cantilever.inp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/fixtures/abaqus/minimal_part_instance_cantilever.inp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/fixtures/abaqus/unsupported_keyword.inp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/io/abaqus/parser_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/integration/io/minimal_deck_to_domain_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: CMake files\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct DeckRecord final {\\r\\n std::string keyword;\\r\\n std::map> parameters;\\r\\n std::vector> data;\\r\\n SourceLocation source;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ParsedPart final {\\r\\n std::string name;\\r\\n std::vector records;\\r\\n SourceLocation source;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ParsedInstance final {\\r\\n std::string name;\\r\\n std::string part_name;\\r\\n std::vector> transform_data;\\r\\n SourceLocation source;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ParsedAssembly final {\\r\\n std::string name;\\r\\n std::vector instances;\\r\\n std::vector records;\\r\\n SourceLocation source;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ParsedDeck final {\\r\\n std::vector global_records;\\r\\n std::vector parts;\\r\\n std::optional assembly;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ParseDeckResult final {\\r\\n std::optional deck;\\r\\n std::vector diagnostics;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] ParseDeckResult parse_deck(const std::filesystem::path& path);\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] DomainBuildResult map_deck_to_domain(const ParsedDeck& deck);\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nEach minimal fixture contains two nodes, one B31 element, one material, one\\r\\ngeneral section, one node set, one element set, one boundary definition, one\\r\\nconcentrated load, and one static step. One fixture is flat; the other contains\\r\\none Part, one Assembly, and one untransformed Instance.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing parser and integration tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nTests must call `parse_deck()` and `map_deck_to_domain()`; they may not\\r\\nconstruct the `Domain` directly. Assert that both organizations produce\\r\\nequivalent active analysis entities and that the hierarchical Domain retains\\r\\nPart/Instance provenance.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Confirm failure**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Abaqus|Deck\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Implement the smallest case-insensitive keyword parser**\\r\\n\\r\\nSupport comments, blank lines, comma-separated parameters and data, UTF-8\\r\\ninput, exact source lines, `*PART/*END PART`, `*ASSEMBLY/*END ASSEMBLY`, and\\r\\n`*INSTANCE/*END INSTANCE`. In this task, accept only the keywords used by the\\r\\ntwo minimal fixtures. Treat `*INCLUDE` and every other keyword as an explicit\\r\\nunsupported-keyword error.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Implement semantic mapping for the fixture**\\r\\n\\r\\nFor hierarchical input, require exactly one Assembly and one Instance, reject\\r\\nnonempty Instance transform data, activate only the referenced Part, and map\\r\\nthe result to the same flat `Domain` used by orphan meshes. When transverse\\r\\nstiffness is omitted, set \\\\(A_{sy}=A_{sz}=5A/6\\\\) and `SCF=0`; supported\\r\\nexplicit values override the default.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Validate and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/io src/fesa/io tests/fixtures tests/unit/io tests/integration/io CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(input): parse minimal Abaqus B31 deck\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 5: FEM Primitives and DOF Management\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/fem/gauss_rule.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/fem/line2_shape.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/fem/local_frame.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/fem/dof_manager.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/fem/local_frame.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/fem/dof_manager.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/fem/gauss_rule_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/fem/line2_shape_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/fem/local_frame_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/fem/dof_manager_test.cpp`\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct GaussPoint1D final { double xi; double weight; };\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] std::array gauss_rule_1();\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] std::array gauss_rule_2();\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] std::array line2_shape(double xi);\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] std::array line2_shape_derivative();\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct LocalFrame final { Vec3 ex; Vec3 ey; Vec3 ez; double length; };\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] LocalFrame make_beam_frame(Vec3 first, Vec3 second, Vec3 orientation);\\r\\n\\r\\nclass DofManager final {\\r\\npublic:\\r\\n explicit DofManager(const Domain& domain);\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] std::size_t full_dof_count() const noexcept;\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] std::array beam_dofs(ElementId id) const;\\r\\n};\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing mathematical invariant tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nTest Gauss exactness through degree 3, shape-function partition of unity, derivative sum zero, right-handed orthonormal frames, nearly parallel orientation rejection, stable external-ID ordering, and 12-DOF element maps.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Confirm failure, implement, and rerun**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Fem|Dof|Frame\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Run full validation and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/fem src/fesa/fem tests/unit/fem CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(fem): add quadrature frames and DOF mapping\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 6: Minimal Real Timoshenko Beam Kernel\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `docs/formulation/timoshenko-beam-3d.md`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/elements/beam/beam3d2.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/elements/beam/beam3d2.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/elements/beam3d2_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: CMake files\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct Beam3D2Input final {\\r\\n std::array coordinates;\\r\\n IsotropicElastic material;\\r\\n BeamSection section;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct Beam3D2Contribution final {\\r\\n std::array stiffness;\\r\\n std::array equivalent_load;\\r\\n LocalFrame frame;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] Beam3D2Contribution evaluate_beam3d2(const Beam3D2Input& input);\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write and review the formulation document before production code**\\r\\n\\r\\nThe document must define DOF order, local axes, strain measures, constitutive diagonal, Jacobian, transformation, Gauss rules, matrix storage order, force/moment signs, and reference sources. It must show that axial/bending/torsion use two points and shear uses one point.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Write failing kernel tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nTest symmetry, six rigid-body modes, positive strain energy for non-rigid modes, analytical axial stiffness \\\\(EA/L\\\\), analytical torsional stiffness \\\\(GJ/L\\\\), coordinate-rotation invariance, and finite values.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Confirm the tests fail**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Beam3D2\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Implement the minimum kernel from the signed-off equations**\\r\\n\\r\\nUse fixed-size `std::array` storage and small explicit loops. Do not add a dynamic matrix abstraction or copy Abaqus slenderness compensation.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Validate and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ngit add docs/formulation include/fesa/elements src/fesa/elements tests/unit/elements CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(elements): add 3D Timoshenko beam kernel\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 7: Deterministic Serial Assembly and Essential BC Elimination\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/assembly/symmetric_coo.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/assembly/symmetric_csr.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/assembly/assembler.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/assembly/assembler.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/constraints/essential_bc.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/constraints/essential_bc.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/assembly/assembler_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/constraints/essential_bc_test.cpp`\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct CooEntry final {\\r\\n std::size_t row;\\r\\n std::size_t column;\\r\\n ElementId source_element;\\r\\n std::size_t local_order;\\r\\n double value;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct SymmetricCsr final {\\r\\n std::vector row_offsets;\\r\\n std::vector column_indices;\\r\\n std::vector values;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct EquationSystem final {\\r\\n SymmetricCsr stiffness;\\r\\n std::vector load;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] EquationSystem assemble_serial(\\r\\n const Domain& domain,\\r\\n const DofManager& dofs);\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ReducedSystem final {\\r\\n SymmetricCsr stiffness;\\r\\n std::vector rhs;\\r\\n std::vector free_dofs;\\r\\n std::vector prescribed_full_values;\\r\\n};\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing assembly tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nCover a one-element matrix, a two-element shared-node chain, stable sort/reduction order, upper-triangle storage with every diagonal present, nonzero prescribed values, reduced RHS correction, and full-vector reconstruction.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Confirm failure and implement serial baseline**\\r\\n\\r\\nSort COO entries by `(row, column, source_element, local_order)` and then sum. This serial result is the oracle for Task 12.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Verify and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Assembly|EssentialBc\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/assembly src/fesa/assembly include/fesa/constraints src/fesa/constraints tests/unit/assembly tests/unit/constraints CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(assembly): assemble and constrain beam systems\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 8: MKL PARDISO Linear Solver Adapter\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/solvers/linear/linear_solver.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/solvers/linear/pardiso_solver.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/solvers/linear/pardiso_solver.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/solvers/pardiso_solver_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: `cmake/FesaDependencies.cmake`\\r\\n- Modify: CMake files\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct LinearSolveResult final {\\r\\n std::vector solution;\\r\\n double relative_residual;\\r\\n std::vector diagnostics;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nclass LinearSolver {\\r\\npublic:\\r\\n virtual ~LinearSolver() = default;\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] virtual LinearSolveResult solve(\\r\\n const SymmetricCsr& matrix,\\r\\n std::span rhs) = 0;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nclass PardisoLinearSolver final : public LinearSolver {\\r\\npublic:\\r\\n PardisoLinearSolver();\\r\\n ~PardisoLinearSolver() override;\\r\\n PardisoLinearSolver(const PardisoLinearSolver&) = delete;\\r\\n PardisoLinearSolver& operator=(const PardisoLinearSolver&) = delete;\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] LinearSolveResult solve(\\r\\n const SymmetricCsr& matrix,\\r\\n std::span rhs) override;\\r\\n};\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing adapter tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nUse a hand-calculated 3x3 SPD system, multiple RHS calls on one adapter, invalid CSR, dimension mismatch, and a singular matrix. Assert `mtype=2`, LP64-compatible index checks, 0-based indexing, and residual reporting through observable behavior.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Confirm failure**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Pardiso\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Implement RAII PARDISO phases**\\r\\n\\r\\nSet `iparm[34]=1` for zero-based indexing and enable the matrix checker. Run symbolic analysis, numerical factorization, solve, and release. Convert every MKL error to `DiagnosticStage::solver`.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Validate and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/solvers src/fesa/solvers tests/unit/solvers cmake/FesaDependencies.cmake CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(solver): add PARDISO linear backend\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 9: Result Model and Minimal HDF5 Round Trip\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `docs/HDF5_SCHEMA.md`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/results/result_database.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/io/hdf5/schema.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/io/hdf5/writer.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/io/hdf5/reader.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/io/hdf5/writer.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/io/hdf5/reader.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/io/hdf5_round_trip_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: CMake files\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct NodalFrame final {\\r\\n std::vector node_ids;\\r\\n std::vector> displacement;\\r\\n std::vector> reaction;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ResultFrame final {\\r\\n double step_time;\\r\\n NodalFrame nodal;\\r\\n std::vector diagnostics;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ResultStep final {\\r\\n std::string name;\\r\\n std::vector frames;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ResultDatabase final {\\r\\n std::string schema_version;\\r\\n std::vector steps;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct Hdf5ReadResult final {\\r\\n std::optional database;\\r\\n std::vector diagnostics;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] std::vector write_hdf5(\\r\\n const std::filesystem::path&,\\r\\n const Domain&,\\r\\n const ResultDatabase&);\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] Hdf5ReadResult read_hdf5_results(const std::filesystem::path&);\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write schema version `1.0.0` before writer code**\\r\\n\\r\\nDefine exact group paths, dataset ranks, scalar types, dense ID mappings,\\r\\nPart/Instance/local-label origins, coordinate-system attributes, applied\\r\\ntransverse-shear values and their input/default source, required HDF5 metadata,\\r\\nand compatibility rules.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Write a failing round-trip test**\\r\\n\\r\\nUse a two-node hierarchical-origin `Domain` and one result frame. Reopen\\r\\nthrough the FESA reader and compare every stored value, origin mapping,\\r\\ntransverse-shear source, and schema attribute.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Confirm failure and implement minimum C-API RAII wrappers**\\r\\n\\r\\nDo not use global HDF5 handles. Convert every failing HDF5 call into a results-stage diagnostic or exception caught at the adapter boundary.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Validate with tests and HDF5 tools**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Hdf5\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\nh5ls -r .\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Testing\\\\Temporary\\\\fesa-round-trip.h5\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ngit add docs/HDF5_SCHEMA.md include/fesa/results include/fesa/io/hdf5 src/fesa/io/hdf5 tests/unit/io CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(results): add versioned HDF5 result adapter\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 10: Linear Static Analysis and End-to-End CLI Slice\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/analysis/analysis.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/analysis/linear_static_analysis.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/analysis/analysis.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/analysis/linear_static_analysis.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/analysis/run_solver.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/analysis/run_solver.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: `src/fesa/cli/main.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/integration/pipeline/minimal_cantilever_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: CMake files\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct AnalysisRequest final {\\r\\n std::filesystem::path input_path;\\r\\n std::filesystem::path output_path;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct AnalysisRunResult final {\\r\\n bool succeeded;\\r\\n std::vector diagnostics;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] AnalysisRunResult run_solver(const AnalysisRequest& request);\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nThe CLI contract is:\\r\\n\\r\\n```text\\r\\nfesa solve --output \\r\\nfesa --version\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write the failing end-to-end test**\\r\\n\\r\\nInvoke only `run_solver()` or the CLI with `tests/fixtures/abaqus/minimal_cantilever.inp`, then use the public HDF5 reader to assert node IDs, finite displacement, equilibrium residual, and result paths.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Confirm the pipeline test fails**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"MinimalCantileverPipeline\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Implement the analysis lifecycle**\\r\\n\\r\\nConnect parser, `Domain`, `DofManager`, Beam kernel, serial assembly, essential BC, PARDISO, full-vector reconstruction, reaction recovery, result model, and HDF5 writer. Keep CLI parsing out of `fesa_core`.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Validate the vertical slice**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\n.\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa.exe solve tests\\\\fixtures\\\\abaqus\\\\minimal_cantilever.inp --output out\\\\minimal-cantilever.h5\\r\\nh5ls -r out\\\\minimal-cantilever.h5\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nExpected: full pipeline succeeds. Do not label the Beam numerically qualified yet.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/analysis src/fesa/analysis src/fesa/cli/main.cpp tests/integration/pipeline CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(analysis): connect linear static pipeline\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 11: Complete the Agreed Abaqus Input Subset\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Modify: Abaqus parser and mapper files from Task 4\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/io/abaqus/set_resolution_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/io/abaqus/scope_resolution_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/io/abaqus/semantic_validation_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/integration/io/multiple_properties_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/integration/io/supplied_cantilever_to_domain_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create fixtures under: `tests/fixtures/abaqus/valid/`\\r\\n- Create fixtures under: `tests/fixtures/abaqus/invalid/`\\r\\n- Create: `docs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.md`\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Existing parser and mapper signatures remain unchanged.\\r\\n- `docs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.md` becomes the normative keyword/parameter/data-line contract.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write the contract document and failing fixture matrix**\\r\\n\\r\\nCover `*NODE`, B31 `*ELEMENT`, `*PART/*END PART`,\\r\\n`*ASSEMBLY/*END ASSEMBLY`, `*INSTANCE/*END INSTANCE`, `*NSET`, `*ELSET`,\\r\\nexplicit members, `GENERATE`, nested set references, `INSTANCE=`,\\r\\n`*MATERIAL`, `*ELASTIC`, general Beam section, optional transverse shear\\r\\nstiffness, `*BOUNDARY`, `*CLOAD`, and one static step. Document\\r\\n`*HEADING`, `*PREPRINT`, `*RESTART`, and `*OUTPUT` as recognized no-op\\r\\ndirectives.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Add invalid tests before parser changes**\\r\\n\\r\\nCover duplicate IDs and origins, missing references, set cycles, invalid\\r\\nranges, multiple section assignments, missing material, conflicting prescribed\\r\\nvalues, unsupported options, `*INCLUDE`, multiple Assemblies, multiple\\r\\nInstances, Instance translation/rotation data, instance-local mesh changes,\\r\\nmixed flat/hierarchical meshes, nonzero `SCF`, multiple steps, and source-line\\r\\naccuracy.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Run and confirm the new tests fail**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Abaqus|SetResolution|MultipleProperties\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Implement only the documented subset**\\r\\n\\r\\nResolve Part and Assembly scopes before normalizing only the active Part and\\r\\nInstance. Resolve nested sets with explicit cycle detection and canonical\\r\\nsorted-unique membership. Recognized no-op directives must be consumed\\r\\ndeliberately; do not add a general ignore-unknown path. Verify the supplied\\r\\n`reference/cantilever beam/cantilever beam.inp` maps to the expected 11 nodes,\\r\\n10 elements, one active material/section, six fixed DOFs, and one nodal load.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Validate and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ngit add docs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.md include/fesa/io/abaqus src/fesa/io/abaqus tests/fixtures/abaqus tests/unit/io/abaqus tests/integration/io\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(input): complete Phase 1 Abaqus subset\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 12: Deterministic oneTBB Assembly\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Modify: `include/fesa/assembly/assembler.hpp`\\r\\n- Modify: `src/fesa/assembly/assembler.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/assembly/parallel_assembler_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/integration/assembly/thread_count_determinism_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/performance/assembly_benchmark.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: CMake files\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct AssemblyOptions final {\\r\\n std::size_t max_threads;\\r\\n std::size_t grain_size;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] EquationSystem assemble_parallel(\\r\\n const Domain& domain,\\r\\n const DofManager& dofs,\\r\\n AssemblyOptions options);\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing serial-versus-parallel tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nGenerate fixed chain and branched Beam domains. Compare CSR row offsets and column indices exactly and values bit-for-bit for thread counts 1, 2, and the available concurrency.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Confirm failure**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"ParallelAssembly|ThreadCount\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Implement parallel element evaluation with deterministic merge**\\r\\n\\r\\nUse oneTBB for independent element evaluation. Each contribution retains `(row, column, element ID, local order)`. Sort and reduce in the same order as the serial oracle. Do not perform concurrent unordered writes to CSR values.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Validate correctness before measuring performance**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\n.\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_assembly_benchmark.exe\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nRecord timings without asserting a speedup in unit tests.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/assembly src/fesa/assembly tests/unit/assembly tests/integration/assembly tests/performance CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"perf(assembly): add deterministic TBB assembly\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 13: Complete Beam Recovery and Self-Contained HDF5 Contract\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Modify: `include/fesa/elements/beam/beam3d2.hpp`\\r\\n- Modify: `src/fesa/elements/beam/beam3d2.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: result-model and HDF5 files from Task 9\\r\\n- Modify: `docs/HDF5_SCHEMA.md`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/elements/beam3d2_recovery_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/integration/results/self_contained_hdf5_test.cpp`\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct BeamSectionResult final {\\r\\n double xi;\\r\\n NodeId end_node;\\r\\n std::array section_strain;\\r\\n std::array section_force;\\r\\n double centroid_sigma_xx;\\r\\n std::vector sigma_xx;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] std::vector recover_beam3d2(\\r\\n const Beam3D2Input& input,\\r\\n std::span element_displacement,\\r\\n std::span> recovery_points);\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing recovery tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nCover pure axial force, pure torsion, bending about each principal axis,\\r\\ncombined axial/biaxial bending, force sign at both element ends,\\r\\n`centroid_sigma_xx=N/A`, and recovery-point ordering.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Write the failing self-contained-file test**\\r\\n\\r\\nReopen one result file and reconstruct node coordinates, connectivity,\\r\\nPart/Instance origins, sets, material, section, applied shear values and their\\r\\nsource, step, solver settings, local frame, nodal fields, element section\\r\\nfields including centroid stress, ID maps, and diagnostics.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Implement recovery and schema additions**\\r\\n\\r\\nDo not output point shear or point torsional stress. Store section shear resultants and torsional moment as generalized quantities.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Validate and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Beam3D2Recovery|SelfContainedHdf5\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/elements src/fesa/elements include/fesa/results include/fesa/io/hdf5 src/fesa/io/hdf5 docs/HDF5_SCHEMA.md tests/unit/elements tests/integration/results\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"feat(results): recover and store beam section results\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 14: Analytical and Available Abaqus 2024 Qualification\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/validation/comparison.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `include/fesa/validation/reference_csv.hpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/validation/comparison.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/validation/reference_csv.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `src/fesa/validation/reference_compare_main.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/validation/comparison_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/unit/validation/reference_csv_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/fixtures/reference/internalforces.csv`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/fixtures/reference/stresses.csv`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/reference/CMakeLists.txt`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/reference/cantilever_reference_test.cpp`\\r\\n- Create: `docs/VALIDATION.md`\\r\\n- Modify: CMake files\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\nstruct Tolerance final {\\r\\n double relative;\\r\\n double absolute_scale;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nenum class ReferenceQuantity {\\r\\n displacement,\\r\\n reaction,\\r\\n internal_force,\\r\\n centroid_stress\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ResultPosition final {\\r\\n std::string instance_name;\\r\\n std::int64_t entity_label;\\r\\n std::optional end_node_label;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ComparisonSample final {\\r\\n ReferenceQuantity quantity;\\r\\n ResultPosition position;\\r\\n std::vector reference;\\r\\n std::vector actual;\\r\\n Tolerance tolerance;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ReferenceRow final {\\r\\n ReferenceQuantity quantity;\\r\\n ResultPosition position;\\r\\n std::vector values;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ComparisonReport final {\\r\\n bool passed;\\r\\n double maximum_normalized_error;\\r\\n std::vector failures;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] ComparisonReport compare_samples(\\r\\n std::span samples);\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct ReferenceCsvReadResult final {\\r\\n std::vector rows;\\r\\n std::vector diagnostics;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\n[[nodiscard]] ReferenceCsvReadResult read_reference_csv(\\r\\n ReferenceQuantity quantity,\\r\\n const std::filesystem::path& path,\\r\\n std::string_view single_instance_name,\\r\\n Tolerance tolerance);\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nFor each scalar component, define\\r\\n\\\\[\\r\\ne_n=\\\\frac{|a-r|}{a_\\\\mathrm{scale}+r_\\\\mathrm{tol}|r|}\\r\\n\\\\]\\r\\nand pass only when \\\\(e_n\\\\leq1\\\\). Reject nonfinite inputs before computing the\\r\\nmetric.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing metric and entity-matching tests**\\r\\n\\r\\nTest the normalized error, near-zero absolute scale, nonfinite values,\\r\\nduplicate positions, unknown entities, invalid element-node pairs, and\\r\\ncomponent-count mismatches.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Write failing CSV adapter tests for all four quantities**\\r\\n\\r\\nAccept the supplied displacement/reaction headers after trimming whitespace.\\r\\nFor a single Instance, allow the `Part Instance Name` column to be absent.\\r\\nUse these exact element schemas:\\r\\n\\r\\n```text\\r\\nPart Instance Name, Element Label, Node Label,\\r\\nSF-SF1, SF-SF2, SF-SF3, SM-SM1, SM-SM2, SM-SM3\\r\\n\\r\\nPart Instance Name, Element Label, Node Label, Sxx\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nMap `SF1,SF2,SF3,SM1,SM2,SM3` to \\\\(N,V_y,V_z,T,M_y,M_z\\\\).\\r\\nCompare `Sxx` with the element-end section-centroid value \\\\(N/A\\\\). The\\r\\nsynthetic fixtures exercise both element result schemas before real files\\r\\nexist.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Write the failing supplied-cantilever reference test**\\r\\n\\r\\nRun FESA through the public parser, analysis, and HDF5 reader. Create an\\r\\nexplicit request selecting only:\\r\\n\\r\\n```text\\r\\nreference/cantilever beam/cantilever beam displacements.csv\\r\\nreference/cantilever beam/cantilever beam reactions.csv\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nUse relative tolerance \\\\(10^{-5}\\\\) and test-registered absolute scales. Do not\\r\\nlook for metadata, internal-force CSV, or stress CSV in this reference test.\\r\\nThe equivalent command-line contract is:\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\nfesa-reference-compare `\\r\\n --results out\\\\cantilever-beam.h5 `\\r\\n --instance Part-1-1 `\\r\\n --displacements \\\"reference\\\\cantilever beam\\\\cantilever beam displacements.csv\\\" `\\r\\n --reactions \\\"reference\\\\cantilever beam\\\\cantilever beam reactions.csv\\\" `\\r\\n --relative-tolerance 1e-5 `\\r\\n --displacement-absolute-scale 1e-10 `\\r\\n --reaction-absolute-scale 1e-8\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Confirm failures before numerical corrections**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --preset windows-debug\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Reference\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Correct only evidenced formulation or recovery defects**\\r\\n\\r\\nFor every change, add or tighten the smallest analytical test that reproduces\\r\\nthe discrepancy. Do not widen tolerance to hide a defect. Record justified\\r\\ntolerance differences in `docs/VALIDATION.md` and the CTest registration.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 6: Run the full qualification suite**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Reference\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nExpected: all analytical, physics-sanity, pipeline, deterministic-parallel,\\r\\nCSV-adapter, and available Abaqus displacement/reaction comparisons pass.\\r\\nDo not claim Abaqus qualification of element internal force or stress until\\r\\nthose CSV files are supplied and selected.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 7: Complete the validation report and commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n`docs/VALIDATION.md` must list each benchmark, analytical/reference source,\\r\\nAbaqus configuration, selected quantities, tolerance, maximum observed error,\\r\\nand disposition. It must distinguish synthetic adapter coverage from\\r\\nAbaqus-backed quantity qualification.\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ngit add include/fesa/validation src/fesa/validation tests/unit/validation tests/fixtures/reference tests/reference docs/VALIDATION.md CMakeLists.txt tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"test(validation): qualify Beam solver against Abaqus\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n### Task 15: Internal Release Gate\\r\\n\\r\\n**Files:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Create: `cmake/install.cmake`\\r\\n- Create: `cmake/FESAConfig.cmake.in`\\r\\n- Create: `docs/BUILDING.md`\\r\\n- Create: `docs/INPUT_FORMAT.md`\\r\\n- Create: `docs/RELEASE_CHECKLIST.md`\\r\\n- Create: `tests/performance/phase1_scale_benchmark.cpp`\\r\\n- Modify: root CMake files\\r\\n- Modify: `docs/VALIDATION.md`\\r\\n\\r\\n**Interfaces:**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Produces install tree containing `fesa.exe`, the static library, public headers, required runtime DLL inventory, example input, schema, and validation report.\\r\\n- No public ABI compatibility promise is made for Phase 1.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 1: Write the release checklist before packaging changes**\\r\\n\\r\\nInclude environment versions, Debug/Release builds, zero-warning requirement,\\r\\nCTest count, selected reference quantities, synthetic four-quantity adapter\\r\\ncoverage, HDF5 inspection, 100k-DOF memory/time measurement, runtime DLL\\r\\ninventory, example run, and clean install-tree smoke test.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 2: Add a failing install-tree smoke test**\\r\\n\\r\\nThe test configures a small consumer against installed headers and the static library, runs `fesa --version`, solves the example, and opens its HDF5 output.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 3: Implement CMake install rules**\\r\\n\\r\\nUse `cmake --install`; do not add an installer, registry writes, package download, or external-customer SDK promise.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 4: Run Debug, Release, performance, and install validation**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --preset windows-debug\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\ncmake --preset windows-release\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-release\\r\\nctest --preset windows-release --output-on-failure\\r\\n.\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-release\\\\Release\\\\fesa_phase1_scale_benchmark.exe\\r\\ncmake --install out\\\\build\\\\windows-release --config Release --prefix out\\\\package\\\\fesa\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\nExpected: all tests pass, no new MSVC warnings exist, the benchmark completes within documented resources, and the clean install-tree smoke test passes.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 5: Verify every PRD release criterion**\\r\\n\\r\\nMap every item in `docs/PRD.md` section 8 to fresh command output or a validation-report entry. Stop the release if any item lacks evidence.\\r\\n\\r\\n- [ ] **Step 6: Commit**\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ngit add cmake/install.cmake docs/BUILDING.md docs/INPUT_FORMAT.md docs/RELEASE_CHECKLIST.md docs/VALIDATION.md tests/performance CMakeLists.txt\\r\\ngit commit -m \\\"chore(release): prepare FESA Phase 1 internal package\\\"\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n## Plan Execution Gate\\r\\n\\r\\nBefore implementation:\\r\\n\\r\\n1. Review and approve this phase split.\\r\\n2. Use the Harness skill to draft `phases/index.json`, each phase index, and self-contained step files.\\r\\n3. Review the phase-file draft before creating it.\\r\\n4. Execute one Harness phase at a time.\\r\\n5. Do not begin the next phase until its tests, review, and acceptance commands pass.\\r\\n\\n\\n===== CMakeLists.txt =====\\ncmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.30)\\n\\nproject(FESA VERSION 0.1.0 LANGUAGES CXX)\\n\\nif(NOT MSVC)\\n message(FATAL_ERROR \\\"FESA requires the Microsoft Visual C++ compiler (MSVC v145).\\\")\\nendif()\\n\\nif(NOT CMAKE_VS_PLATFORM_TOOLSET STREQUAL \\\"v145\\\")\\n message(\\n FATAL_ERROR\\n \\\"FESA requires the v145 platform toolset; configured toolset is \\\"\\n \\\"'${CMAKE_VS_PLATFORM_TOOLSET}'.\\\"\\n )\\nendif()\\n\\nif(NOT CMAKE_GENERATOR_PLATFORM STREQUAL \\\"x64\\\")\\n message(FATAL_ERROR \\\"FESA requires the x64 generator platform.\\\")\\nendif()\\n\\nif(NOT CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8)\\n message(FATAL_ERROR \\\"FESA requires a 64-bit target.\\\")\\nendif()\\n\\ninclude(cmake/FesaDependencies.cmake)\\n\\nadd_library(fesa_core STATIC\\n src/fesa/core/version.cpp\\n)\\n\\ntarget_include_directories(fesa_core\\n PUBLIC\\n \\\"${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/include\\\"\\n)\\n\\ntarget_compile_features(fesa_core PUBLIC cxx_std_20)\\ntarget_compile_options(fesa_core PRIVATE /W4 /permissive- /EHsc)\\n\\nadd_executable(fesa\\n src/fesa/cli/main.cpp\\n)\\n\\ntarget_link_libraries(fesa PRIVATE fesa_core)\\ntarget_compile_features(fesa PRIVATE cxx_std_20)\\ntarget_compile_options(fesa PRIVATE /W4 /permissive- /EHsc)\\n\\ninclude(CTest)\\n\\nif(BUILD_TESTING)\\n add_subdirectory(tests)\\nendif()\\n\\n\\n===== tests/CMakeLists.txt =====\\nadd_test(\\n NAME VersionCommand\\n COMMAND \\\"${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/$/fesa.exe\\\" --version\\n)\\n\\nset_tests_properties(\\n VersionCommand\\n PROPERTIES\\n PASS_REGULAR_EXPRESSION \\\"[0-9]+\\\\\\\\.[0-9]+\\\\\\\\.[0-9]+\\\"\\n)\\n\\nadd_executable(fesa_dependency_smoke_test\\n unit/dependencies/dependency_smoke_test.cpp\\n)\\n\\ntarget_compile_features(fesa_dependency_smoke_test PRIVATE cxx_std_20)\\ntarget_compile_options(fesa_dependency_smoke_test PRIVATE /W4 /permissive- /EHsc)\\n\\ntarget_link_libraries(fesa_dependency_smoke_test\\n PRIVATE\\n MKL::MKL\\n TBB::tbb\\n HDF5::HDF5\\n GTest::gtest_main\\n GTest::gtest\\n GTest::gmock\\n)\\n\\nadd_test(\\n NAME DependencySmoke\\n COMMAND \\\"$\\\"\\n)\\n\\nset_property(\\n TEST DependencySmoke\\n PROPERTY ENVIRONMENT_MODIFICATION\\n ${FESA_DEPENDENCY_RUNTIME_MODIFICATIONS}\\n)\\n\\n\\n===== include/fesa/core/version.hpp =====\\n#pragma once\\n\\n#include \\n\\nnamespace fesa {\\n\\n[[nodiscard]] std::string_view version() noexcept;\\n\\n}\\n\\n\\n===== tests/unit/dependencies/dependency_smoke_test.cpp =====\\n#include \\n#include \\n#include \\n#include \\n\\n#include \\n#include \\n#include \\n#include \\n#include \\n\\nnamespace {\\n\\nTEST(DependencySmoke, CallsOneMklVectorOperation) {\\n constexpr std::array x{1.0, 2.0, 3.0};\\n std::array y{4.0, 5.0, 6.0};\\n\\n cblas_daxpy(\\n static_cast(x.size()), 2.0, x.data(), 1, y.data(), 1);\\n\\n EXPECT_THAT(y, ::testing::ElementsAre(6.0, 9.0, 12.0));\\n}\\n\\nTEST(DependencySmoke, RunsLimitedOneTbbParallelLoop) {\\n std::array values{};\\n const oneapi::tbb::global_control limit{\\n oneapi::tbb::global_control::max_allowed_parallelism, 2};\\n\\n oneapi::tbb::parallel_for(\\n std::size_t{0}, values.size(), [&values](const std::size_t index) {\\n values[index] = index + 1;\\n });\\n\\n EXPECT_THAT(values, ::testing::ElementsAre(\\n 1U, 2U, 3U, 4U, 5U, 6U, 7U, 8U,\\n 9U, 10U, 11U, 12U, 13U, 14U, 15U, 16U));\\n}\\n\\nTEST(DependencySmoke, CreatesAndClosesHdf5File) {\\n const auto path =\\n std::filesystem::path{::testing::TempDir()} /\\n \\\"fesa_dependency_smoke.h5\\\";\\n\\n const hid_t file = H5Fcreate(\\n path.string().c_str(), H5F_ACC_TRUNC, H5P_DEFAULT, H5P_DEFAULT);\\n ASSERT_GE(file, 0);\\n EXPECT_GE(H5Fclose(file), 0);\\n\\n std::error_code error;\\n std::filesystem::remove(path, error);\\n EXPECT_FALSE(error);\\n}\\n\\n} // namespace\\n\\n\\n===== phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json =====\\n{\\r\\n \\\"project\\\": \\\"FESA\\\",\\r\\n \\\"phase\\\": \\\"solver-bootstrap\\\",\\r\\n \\\"steps\\\": [\\r\\n {\\r\\n \\\"step\\\": 0,\\r\\n \\\"name\\\": \\\"harness-self-tests\\\",\\r\\n \\\"status\\\": \\\"completed\\\",\\r\\n \\\"summary\\\": \\\"Added tests/harness/test_config.py, test_discovery.py, and test_process.py characterization tests for documented Harness contracts.\\\",\\r\\n \\\"started_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-29T23:58:15+0900\\\",\\r\\n \\\"completed_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-30T00:02:27+0900\\\"\\r\\n },\\r\\n {\\r\\n \\\"step\\\": 1,\\r\\n \\\"name\\\": \\\"cmake-project-scaffold\\\",\\r\\n \\\"status\\\": \\\"completed\\\",\\r\\n \\\"summary\\\": \\\"Added the CMake/CTest presets and Harness config plus the fesa_core version API and fesa --version CLI scaffold.\\\",\\r\\n \\\"started_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-30T00:24:06+0900\\\",\\r\\n \\\"completed_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-30T00:46:21+0900\\\"\\r\\n },\\r\\n {\\r\\n \\\"step\\\": 2,\\r\\n \\\"name\\\": \\\"dependency-smoke-tests\\\",\\r\\n \\\"status\\\": \\\"completed\\\",\\r\\n \\\"started_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-30T12:18:16+0900\\\",\\r\\n \\\"summary\\\": \\\"Added installed-package discovery for MKL::MKL (LP64/dynamic/TBB), TBB::tbb, hdf5::hdf5-shared via HDF5::HDF5, and GoogleTest/GoogleMock plus a runtime dependency smoke test.\\\",\\r\\n \\\"completed_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-30T12:51:15+0900\\\"\\r\\n },\\r\\n {\\r\\n \\\"step\\\": 3,\\r\\n \\\"name\\\": \\\"core-ids-and-diagnostics\\\",\\r\\n \\\"status\\\": \\\"pending\\\",\\r\\n \\\"started_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-30T12:53:17+0900\\\"\\r\\n }\\r\\n ],\\r\\n \\\"created_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-29T23:58:15+0900\\\"\\r\\n}\\n\\n===== .harness/config.json =====\\n{\\n \\\"version\\\": 1,\\n \\\"projectType\\\": \\\"cmake\\\",\\n \\\"cmake\\\": {\\n \\\"sourceDir\\\": \\\".\\\",\\n \\\"binaryDir\\\": \\\"out/build/windows-debug\\\",\\n \\\"configurePreset\\\": \\\"windows-debug\\\",\\n \\\"buildPreset\\\": \\\"windows-debug\\\",\\n \\\"testPreset\\\": \\\"windows-debug\\\"\\n }\\n}\\n\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_11\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"계획의 Task 2와 현재 Step 3 사이에 작은 차이가 있습니다. 이번 Step 3의 명시적 계약이 우선하므로 `DiagnosticStage::validation`, `Severity`, `status.hpp`를 포함하고, 이전 계획에만 있던 `lexical`·`entity_id` 진단 필드는 추가하지 않겠습니다. `Status`는 요구된 실패 사례를 담는 최소 타입으로 설계하되, 실제 테스트에서 필요한 API만 확정하겠습니다. 현재 경로는 이미 전용 `.worktrees/solver-bootstrap`이므로 새 worktree는 만들지 않고 분리 상태만 확인합니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_12\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var wtSkill3 = String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-git-worktrees\\\\SKILL.md`; nodeRepl.write(await fs3.readFile(wtSkill3,'utf8'));\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read worktree safety guidance\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_12\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var wtSkill3 = String.raw`C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-git-worktrees\\\\SKILL.md`; nodeRepl.write(await fs3.readFile(wtSkill3,'utf8'));\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read worktree safety guidance\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"---\\nname: using-git-worktrees\\ndescription: Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback\\n---\\n\\n# Using Git Worktrees\\n\\n## Overview\\n\\nEnsure work happens in an isolated workspace. Prefer your platform's native worktree tools. Fall back to manual git worktrees only when no native tool is available.\\n\\n**Core principle:** Detect existing isolation first. Then use native tools. Then fall back to git. Never fight the harness.\\n\\n**Announce at start:** \\\"I'm using the using-git-worktrees skill to set up an isolated workspace.\\\"\\n\\n## Step 0: Detect Existing Isolation\\n\\n**Before creating anything, check if you are already in an isolated workspace.**\\n\\n```bash\\nGIT_DIR=$(cd \\\"$(git rev-parse --git-dir)\\\" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)\\nGIT_COMMON=$(cd \\\"$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)\\\" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)\\nBRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)\\n```\\n\\n**Submodule guard:** `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` is also true inside git submodules. Before concluding \\\"already in a worktree,\\\" verify you are not in a submodule:\\n\\n```bash\\n# If this returns a path, you're in a submodule, not a worktree — treat as normal repo\\ngit rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree 2>/dev/null\\n```\\n\\n**If `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` (and not a submodule):** You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 2 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.\\n\\nReport with branch state:\\n- On a branch: \\\"Already in isolated workspace at `` on branch ``.\\\"\\n- Detached HEAD: \\\"Already in isolated workspace at `` (detached HEAD, externally managed). Branch creation needed at finish time.\\\"\\n\\n**If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON` (or in a submodule):** You are in a normal repo checkout.\\n\\nHas the user already indicated their worktree preference in your instructions? If not, ask for consent before creating a worktree:\\n\\n> \\\"Would you like me to set up an isolated worktree? It protects your current branch from changes.\\\"\\n\\nHonor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 2.\\n\\n## Step 1: Create Isolated Workspace\\n\\n**You have two mechanisms. Try them in this order.**\\n\\n### 1a. Native Worktree Tools (preferred)\\n\\nThe user has asked for an isolated workspace (Step 0 consent). Do you already have a way to create a worktree? It might be a tool with a name like `EnterWorktree`, `WorktreeCreate`, a `/worktree` command, or a `--worktree` flag. If you do, use it and skip to Step 2.\\n\\nNative tools handle directory placement, branch creation, and cleanup automatically. Using `git worktree add` when you have a native tool creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage.\\n\\nOnly proceed to Step 1b if you have no native worktree tool available.\\n\\n### 1b. Git Worktree Fallback\\n\\n**Only use this if Step 1a does not apply** — you have no native worktree tool available. Create a worktree manually using git.\\n\\n#### Directory Selection\\n\\nFollow this priority order. Explicit user preference always beats observed filesystem state.\\n\\n1. **Check your instructions for a declared worktree directory preference.** If the user has already specified one, use it without asking.\\n\\n2. **Check for an existing project-local worktree directory:**\\n ```bash\\n ls -d .worktrees 2>/dev/null # Preferred (hidden)\\n ls -d worktrees 2>/dev/null # Alternative\\n ```\\n If found, use it. If both exist, `.worktrees` wins.\\n\\n3. **If there is no other guidance available**, default to `.worktrees/` at the project root.\\n\\n#### Safety Verification (project-local directories only)\\n\\n**MUST verify directory is ignored before creating worktree:**\\n\\n```bash\\ngit check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/dev/null\\n```\\n\\n**If NOT ignored:** Add to .gitignore, commit the change, then proceed.\\n\\n**Why critical:** Prevents accidentally committing worktree contents to repository.\\n\\n#### Create the Worktree\\n\\n```bash\\n# Determine path based on chosen location\\npath=\\\"$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME\\\"\\n\\ngit worktree add \\\"$path\\\" -b \\\"$BRANCH_NAME\\\"\\ncd \\\"$path\\\"\\n```\\n\\n**Sandbox fallback:** If `git worktree add` fails with a permission error (sandbox denial), tell the user the sandbox blocked worktree creation and you're working in the current directory instead. Then run setup and baseline tests in place.\\n\\n## Step 2: Project Setup\\n\\nAuto-detect and run appropriate setup:\\n\\n```bash\\n# Node.js\\nif [ -f package.json ]; then npm install; fi\\n\\n# Rust\\nif [ -f Cargo.toml ]; then cargo build; fi\\n\\n# Python\\nif [ -f requirements.txt ]; then pip install -r requirements.txt; fi\\nif [ -f pyproject.toml ]; then poetry install; fi\\n\\n# Go\\nif [ -f go.mod ]; then go mod download; fi\\n```\\n\\n## Step 3: Verify Clean Baseline\\n\\nRun tests to ensure workspace starts clean:\\n\\n```bash\\n# Use project-appropriate command\\nnpm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...\\n```\\n\\n**If tests fail:** Report failures, ask whether to proceed or investigate.\\n\\n**If tests pass:** Report ready.\\n\\n### Report\\n\\n```\\nWorktree ready at \\nTests passing ( tests, 0 failures)\\nReady to implement \\n```\\n\\n## Quick Reference\\n\\n| Situation | Action |\\n|-----------|--------|\\n| Already in linked worktree | Skip creation (Step 0) |\\n| In a submodule | Treat as normal repo (Step 0 guard) |\\n| Native worktree tool available | Use it (Step 1a) |\\n| No native tool | Git worktree fallback (Step 1b) |\\n| `.worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify ignored) |\\n| `worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify ignored) |\\n| Both exist | Use `.worktrees/` |\\n| Neither exists | Check instruction file, then default `.worktrees/` |\\n| Directory not ignored | Add to .gitignore + commit |\\n| Permission error on create | Sandbox fallback, work in place |\\n| Tests fail during baseline | Report failures + ask |\\n| No package.json/Cargo.toml | Skip dependency install |\\n\\n## Common Rationalizations\\n\\n| Excuse | Reality |\\n|--------|---------|\\n| \\\"I'm obviously not in a worktree — no need to check\\\" | Run Step 0. Harness-created isolation and submodules both fool eyeballing; the detection commands settle it. |\\n| \\\"`git worktree add` is quicker than hunting for a native tool\\\" | A native tool (e.g. `EnterWorktree`) owns placement, branching, and cleanup. Bypassing it is the #1 mistake — it creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage. |\\n| \\\"The worktree directory is surely ignored already\\\" | Run `git check-ignore`. An unignored worktree directory commits the whole tree into the repo. |\\n| \\\"Any directory name works\\\" | Explicit instructions beat an existing project-local directory, which beats the `.worktrees/` default. |\\n| \\\"The workspace is fresh — baseline tests can wait\\\" | A dirty baseline makes every later failure ambiguous. Run the tests now; proceeding past failures is your human partner's call. |\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_13\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var cp3 = await import('node:child_process'); var run3 = (file,args,opts={}) => cp3.spawnSync(file,args,{cwd:repo3,encoding:'utf8',windowsHide:true,...opts}); var gitDir3=run3('git',['rev-parse','--git-dir']); var gitCommon3=run3('git',['rev-parse','--git-common-dir']); var gitBranch3=run3('git',['branch','--show-current']); var gitSuper3=run3('git',['rev-parse','--show-superproject-working-tree']); var gitStatus3=run3('git',['status','--short']); nodeRepl.write(JSON.stringify({gitDir:gitDir3.stdout?.trim(),gitCommon:gitCommon3.stdout?.trim(),branch:gitBranch3.stdout?.trim(),superproject:gitSuper3.stdout?.trim(),status:gitStatus3.stdout,errors:[gitDir3.error?.message,gitCommon3.error?.message,gitBranch3.error?.message,gitStatus3.error?.message],codes:[gitDir3.status,gitCommon3.status,gitBranch3.status,gitStatus3.status]},null,2));\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Verify isolated worktree state\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_13\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var cp3 = await import('node:child_process'); var run3 = (file,args,opts={}) => cp3.spawnSync(file,args,{cwd:repo3,encoding:'utf8',windowsHide:true,...opts}); var gitDir3=run3('git',['rev-parse','--git-dir']); var gitCommon3=run3('git',['rev-parse','--git-common-dir']); var gitBranch3=run3('git',['branch','--show-current']); var gitSuper3=run3('git',['rev-parse','--show-superproject-working-tree']); var gitStatus3=run3('git',['status','--short']); nodeRepl.write(JSON.stringify({gitDir:gitDir3.stdout?.trim(),gitCommon:gitCommon3.stdout?.trim(),branch:gitBranch3.stdout?.trim(),superproject:gitSuper3.stdout?.trim(),status:gitStatus3.stdout,errors:[gitDir3.error?.message,gitCommon3.error?.message,gitBranch3.error?.message,gitStatus3.error?.message],codes:[gitDir3.status,gitCommon3.status,gitBranch3.status,gitStatus3.status]},null,2));\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Verify isolated worktree state\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"{\\n \\\"gitDir\\\": \\\"C:/git/FESA/.git/worktrees/solver-bootstrap\\\",\\n \\\"gitCommon\\\": \\\"C:/git/FESA/.git\\\",\\n \\\"branch\\\": \\\"feat-solver-bootstrap\\\",\\n \\\"superproject\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n \\\"status\\\": \\\" M phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json\\\\n\\\",\\n \\\"errors\\\": [\\n null,\\n null,\\n null,\\n null\\n ],\\n \\\"codes\\\": [\\n 0,\\n 0,\\n 0,\\n 0\\n ]\\n}\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_14\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"기존 분리 상태를 확인했습니다. 현재 `feat-solver-bootstrap` linked worktree이며 submodule이 아닙니다. 작업 전 변경은 executor가 기록한 `phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json`의 `started_at`뿐이므로 보존하겠습니다. 이제 현재 baseline 빌드와 전체 CTest를 실행해 기존 실패와 이번 변경의 실패를 구분하겠습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_15\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var baselineBuild3=run3('cmake',['--build','--preset','windows-debug'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`BUILD_EXIT=${baselineBuild3.status}\\\\n${baselineBuild3.stdout||''}${baselineBuild3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Build clean baseline\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_15\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var baselineBuild3=run3('cmake',['--build','--preset','windows-debug'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`BUILD_EXIT=${baselineBuild3.status}\\\\n${baselineBuild3.stdout||''}${baselineBuild3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Build clean baseline\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"BUILD_EXIT=0\\nmsbuild 버전 18.8.2+ce25c0108(.NET Framework용)\\r\\n\\r\\n 1>Checking Build System\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n version.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n version.cpp\\r\\n fesa_core.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_core.lib\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n main.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n main.cpp\\r\\n fesa.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa.exe\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n dependency_smoke_test.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n dependency_smoke_test.cpp\\r\\n fesa_dependency_smoke_test.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_dependency_smoke_test.exe\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_16\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var baselineTest3=run3('ctest',['--preset','windows-debug','--output-on-failure'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`CTEST_EXIT=${baselineTest3.status}\\\\n${baselineTest3.stdout||''}${baselineTest3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Run baseline CTest suite\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_16\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var baselineTest3=run3('ctest',['--preset','windows-debug','--output-on-failure'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`CTEST_EXIT=${baselineTest3.status}\\\\n${baselineTest3.stdout||''}${baselineTest3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Run baseline CTest suite\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"CTEST_EXIT=0\\nTest project C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/out/build/windows-debug\\n Start 1: VersionCommand\\n1/2 Test #1: VersionCommand ................... Passed 0.03 sec\\n Start 2: DependencySmoke\\n2/2 Test #2: DependencySmoke .................. Passed 0.11 sec\\n\\n100% tests passed out of 2\\n\\nTotal Test time (real) = 0.19 sec\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_17\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"Baseline은 빌드 성공, CTest 2/2 통과입니다. 구현 전 설계 선택은 헤더 전용 최소 값 타입입니다: `EntityId` 생성자는 음수에서 `std::invalid_argument`, `Vec3`는 `is_finite(Vec3)`, `Status`는 성공/실패와 진단 목록만 소유하도록 하겠습니다. 이렇게 하면 외부 라이브러리나 직렬화 계층 없이 음수/nonfinite 실패를 실제 호출 경계에서 검증할 수 있고, 이후 DomainBuilder가 그대로 진단을 전달할 수 있습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_18\",\"type\":\"todo_list\",\"items\":[{\"text\":\"필수 문서·계획·기존 코드와 clean baseline 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"Core 값 타입 GoogleTest를 먼저 추가하고 예상 RED 확인\",\"completed\":false},{\"text\":\"요구된 5개 core header를 최소 구현하고 GREEN 확인\",\"completed\":false},{\"text\":\"focused/전체 CTest와 외부 header 독립성 확인\",\"completed\":false},{\"text\":\"phase index를 completed/summary로 갱신하고 최종 diff 확인\",\"completed\":false}]}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_19\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var step3Path3=repo3+String.raw`\\\\phases\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\step3.md`; nodeRepl.write(await fs3.readFile(step3Path3,'utf8'));\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read exact Step 3 instructions\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_19\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var step3Path3=repo3+String.raw`\\\\phases\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\step3.md`; nodeRepl.write(await fs3.readFile(step3Path3,'utf8'));\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read exact Step 3 instructions\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"# Step 3: Core IDs and Diagnostics\\n\\r\\n## 읽어야 할 파일\\r\\n\\r\\n- `/AGENTS.md`\\r\\n- `/docs/PRD.md`\\r\\n- `/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`\\r\\n- `/docs/ADR.md`\\r\\n- `/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-29-fesa-phase-1.md`\\n- `/CMakeLists.txt`\\n- `/tests/CMakeLists.txt`\\n- `/include/fesa/core/version.hpp`\\n- `/tests/unit/dependencies/dependency_smoke_test.cpp`\\n\\r\\n## 작업\\r\\n\\r\\n외부 라이브러리에 의존하지 않는 `core` 값 타입을 TDD로 구현한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n- 생성 파일:\\r\\n `include/fesa/core/entity_id.hpp`, `vec3.hpp`, `source_location.hpp`,\\r\\n `diagnostic.hpp`, `status.hpp`와 대응 테스트\\r\\n- 인터페이스:\\r\\n\\r\\n```cpp\\r\\ntemplate\\r\\nclass EntityId final {\\r\\npublic:\\r\\n explicit constexpr EntityId(std::int64_t value);\\r\\n [[nodiscard]] constexpr std::int64_t value() const noexcept;\\r\\n auto operator<=>(const EntityId&) const = default;\\r\\n};\\r\\n\\r\\nstruct Vec3 final { double x; double y; double z; };\\r\\nstruct SourceLocation final {\\r\\n std::filesystem::path file;\\r\\n std::size_t line;\\r\\n std::size_t column;\\r\\n};\\r\\nenum class DiagnosticStage { io, syntax, semantic, model, equation, solver, results, validation };\\r\\nenum class Severity { warning, error };\\r\\nstruct Diagnostic final {\\r\\n DiagnosticStage stage;\\r\\n Severity severity;\\r\\n std::string code;\\r\\n std::string message;\\r\\n std::optional source;\\r\\n};\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n- typed ID의 잘못된 암시 변환, 음수 ID, nonfinite vector와 diagnostic source 보존을\\r\\n 실패 테스트로 먼저 고정한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\r\\n\\r\\n```powershell\\r\\ncmake --build --preset windows-debug\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug -R \\\"Core|Diagnostic|EntityId\\\" --output-on-failure\\r\\nctest --preset windows-debug --output-on-failure\\r\\n```\\r\\n\\r\\n## 검증 절차\\r\\n\\r\\n1. production header 전에 실패하는 GoogleTest를 작성한다.\\r\\n2. 최소 값 타입만 구현한다.\\r\\n3. focused test와 전체 CTest를 실행한다.\\r\\n4. `core`가 MKL, TBB, HDF5, Abaqus header를 include하지 않는지 확인한다.\\r\\n5. index와 summary를 갱신한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## 금지사항\\r\\n\\r\\n- 단위 변환 시스템을 만들지 마라. 이유: FESA는 일관 단위계만 사용한다.\\r\\n- 범용 reflection이나 serialization을 만들지 마라. 이유: 요구되지 않았다.\\r\\n- equation ID를 정의하지 마라. 이유: `DofManager` 단계의 책임이다.\\r\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_20\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var rgStatus3=run3('rg',['-n','\\\\bStatus\\\\b|status.hpp','AGENTS.md','docs','phases','include','src','tests']); nodeRepl.write(`EXIT=${rgStatus3.status}\\\\n${rgStatus3.stdout||''}${rgStatus3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Find existing Status contracts\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_20\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var rgStatus3=run3('rg',['-n','\\\\bStatus\\\\b|status.hpp','AGENTS.md','docs','phases','include','src','tests']); nodeRepl.write(`EXIT=${rgStatus3.status}\\\\n${rgStatus3.stdout||''}${rgStatus3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Find existing Status contracts\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"EXIT=0\\nphases\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\step3.md:21: `diagnostic.hpp`, `status.hpp`와 대응 테스트\\r\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_21\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var filesCore3=run3('rg',['--files','tests/unit']); nodeRepl.write(filesCore3.stdout||filesCore3.stderr||'');\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Inspect current unit-test layout\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_21\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var filesCore3=run3('rg',['--files','tests/unit']); nodeRepl.write(filesCore3.stdout||filesCore3.stderr||'');\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Inspect current unit-test layout\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"tests/unit\\\\dependencies\\\\dependency_smoke_test.cpp\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_22\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"이제 RED 단계입니다. 각 테스트가 잡는 결함은 명확히 분리합니다: `EntityId`는 암시 변환·음수 허용·값/비교 계약, `Vec3`는 NaN/±∞ 누락, `Diagnostic`은 source 필드 손실, `Status`는 진단 목록 손실입니다. 테스트는 실제 타입만 사용하고 mock이나 테스트 전용 production API는 만들지 않습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_23\",\"type\":\"file_change\",\"changes\":[{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\CMakeLists.txt\",\"kind\":\"update\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\diagnostic_test.cpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\entity_id_test.cpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\status_test.cpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\vec3_test.cpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"}],\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_23\",\"type\":\"file_change\",\"changes\":[{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\CMakeLists.txt\",\"kind\":\"update\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\diagnostic_test.cpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\entity_id_test.cpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\status_test.cpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\vec3_test.cpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"}],\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_24\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var redBuild3=run3('cmake',['--build','--preset','windows-debug'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`RED_BUILD_EXIT=${redBuild3.status}\\\\n${redBuild3.stdout||''}${redBuild3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Verify core tests fail before implementation\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_24\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var redBuild3=run3('cmake',['--build','--preset','windows-debug'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`RED_BUILD_EXIT=${redBuild3.status}\\\\n${redBuild3.stdout||''}${redBuild3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Verify core tests fail before implementation\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"RED_BUILD_EXIT=1\\nCMake is re-running because C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/out/build/windows-debug/tests/CMakeFiles/generate.stamp is out-of-date.\\n the file 'C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/tests/CMakeLists.txt'\\n is newer than 'C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/out/build/windows-debug/tests/CMakeFiles/generate.stamp.depend'\\n result='-1'\\n-- Selecting Windows SDK version 10.0.26100.0 to target Windows 10.0.26200.\\n-- MKL_VERSION: 2026.1.0\\n-- MKL_ROOT: C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1\\n-- MKL_ARCH: intel64\\n-- MKL_LINK: dynamic\\n-- MKL_INTERFACE_FULL: intel_lp64\\n-- MKL_THREADING: tbb_thread\\n-- MKL_MPI: intelmpi\\n-- Found C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/lib/mkl_scalapack_lp64_dll.lib\\n-- Found DLL: C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/bin/mkl_scalapack_lp64.2.dll\\n-- Found C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/lib/mkl_cdft_core_dll.lib\\n-- Found DLL: C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/bin/mkl_cdft_core.2.dll\\n-- Found C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/lib/mkl_intel_lp64_dll.lib\\n-- Found C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/lib/mkl_tbb_thread_dll.lib\\n-- Found DLL: C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/bin/mkl_tbb_thread.3.dll\\n-- Found C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/lib/mkl_core_dll.lib\\n-- Found DLL: C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/bin/mkl_core.3.dll\\n-- Found C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/lib/mkl_blacs_lp64_dll.lib\\n-- Found DLL: C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/bin/mkl_blacs_lp64.2.dll\\n-- Found C:/Program Files (x86)/Intel/oneAPI/2026.1/bin/tbb12.dll\\n-- Configuring done (0.1s)\\n-- Generating done (0.3s)\\n-- Build files have been written to: C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/out/build/windows-debug\\nmsbuild 버전 18.8.2+ce25c0108(.NET Framework용)\\r\\n\\r\\n 1>Checking Build System\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n version.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n version.cpp\\r\\n fesa_core.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_core.lib\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n main.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n main.cpp\\r\\n fesa.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa.exe\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n diagnostic_test.cpp\\r\\n entity_id_test.cpp\\r\\n status_test.cpp\\r\\n vec3_test.cpp\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\entity_id_test.cpp(7,10): fatal error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/entity_id.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\vec3_test.cpp(5,10): fatal error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/vec3.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\vec3_test.cpp(5,10): error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/vec3.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\entity_id_test.cpp(7,10): error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/entity_id.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\diagnostic_test.cpp(7,10): error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/diagnostic.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\status_test.cpp(6,10): fatal error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/status.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\status_test.cpp(6,10): error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/status.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\diagnostic_test.cpp(7,10): fatal error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/diagnostic.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\Program Files\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio\\\\18\\\\Community\\\\MSBuild\\\\Microsoft\\\\VC\\\\v180\\\\Microsoft.CppCommon.targets(534,5): warning MSB8074: 모듈 종속성 파일 fesa_core_value_tests.dir\\\\Debug\\\\diagnostic_test.cpp.module.json을(를) 읽을 수 없습니다. 네임스페이스 ''의 'root' 요소가 필요합니다.. 이름 '', 네임스페이스 ''을(를) 가진 'None'이(가) 발견되었습니다. 빌드 순서가 잘못되었을 수 있습니다. [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\Program Files\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio\\\\18\\\\Community\\\\MSBuild\\\\Microsoft\\\\VC\\\\v180\\\\Microsoft.CppCommon.targets(534,5): warning MSB8074: 모듈 종속성 파일 fesa_core_value_tests.dir\\\\Debug\\\\entity_id_test.cpp.module.json을(를) 읽을 수 없습니다. 네임스페이스 ''의 'root' 요소가 필요합니다.. 이름 '', 네임스페이스 ''을(를) 가진 'None'이(가) 발견되었습니다. 빌드 순서가 잘못되었을 수 있습니다. [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\Program Files\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio\\\\18\\\\Community\\\\MSBuild\\\\Microsoft\\\\VC\\\\v180\\\\Microsoft.CppCommon.targets(534,5): warning MSB8074: 모듈 종속성 파일 fesa_core_value_tests.dir\\\\Debug\\\\status_test.cpp.module.json을(를) 읽을 수 없습니다. 네임스페이스 ''의 'root' 요소가 필요합니다.. 이름 '', 네임스페이스 ''을(를) 가진 'None'이(가) 발견되었습니다. 빌드 순서가 잘못되었을 수 있습니다. [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\Program Files\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio\\\\18\\\\Community\\\\MSBuild\\\\Microsoft\\\\VC\\\\v180\\\\Microsoft.CppCommon.targets(534,5): warning MSB8074: 모듈 종속성 파일 fesa_core_value_tests.dir\\\\Debug\\\\vec3_test.cpp.module.json을(를) 읽을 수 없습니다. 네임스페이스 ''의 'root' 요소가 필요합니다.. 이름 '', 네임스페이스 ''을(를) 가진 'None'이(가) 발견되었습니다. 빌드 순서가 잘못되었을 수 있습니다. [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n entity_id_test.cpp\\r\\n status_test.cpp\\r\\n diagnostic_test.cpp\\r\\n vec3_test.cpp\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\entity_id_test.cpp(7,10): error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/entity_id.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\vec3_test.cpp(5,10): error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/vec3.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\diagnostic_test.cpp(7,10): error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/diagnostic.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\nC:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\tests\\\\unit\\\\core\\\\status_test.cpp(6,10): error C1083: 포함 파일을 열 수 없습니다. 'fesa/core/status.hpp': No such file or directory [C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj]\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n dependency_smoke_test.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n dependency_smoke_test.cpp\\r\\n fesa_dependency_smoke_test.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_dependency_smoke_test.exe\\r\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_25\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"RED가 의도대로 확인됐습니다: 새 테스트 타깃이 네 production header 부재로 컴파일 실패했습니다. 이제 테스트가 요구한 동작만 구현합니다. 다섯 파일 모두 표준 라이브러리만 include하며, `Status`는 새 정책을 만들지 않는 단순 `{succeeded, diagnostics}` aggregate로 제한합니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_26\",\"type\":\"file_change\",\"changes\":[{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\diagnostic.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\entity_id.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\source_location.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\status.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\vec3.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"}],\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_26\",\"type\":\"file_change\",\"changes\":[{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\diagnostic.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\entity_id.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\source_location.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\status.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"},{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\include\\\\fesa\\\\core\\\\vec3.hpp\",\"kind\":\"add\"}],\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_27\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var greenBuild3=run3('cmake',['--build','--preset','windows-debug'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`GREEN_BUILD_EXIT=${greenBuild3.status}\\\\n${greenBuild3.stdout||''}${greenBuild3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Build minimal core implementation\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_27\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var greenBuild3=run3('cmake',['--build','--preset','windows-debug'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`GREEN_BUILD_EXIT=${greenBuild3.status}\\\\n${greenBuild3.stdout||''}${greenBuild3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Build minimal core implementation\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"GREEN_BUILD_EXIT=0\\nmsbuild 버전 18.8.2+ce25c0108(.NET Framework용)\\r\\n\\r\\n 1>Checking Build System\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n version.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n version.cpp\\r\\n fesa_core.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_core.lib\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n main.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n main.cpp\\r\\n fesa.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\Debug\\\\fesa.exe\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n diagnostic_test.cpp\\r\\n status_test.cpp\\r\\n vec3_test.cpp\\r\\n entity_id_test.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n status_test.cpp\\r\\n vec3_test.cpp\\r\\n diagnostic_test.cpp\\r\\n entity_id_test.cpp\\r\\n fesa_core_value_tests.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.exe\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n 모듈 종속성의 소스를 검사하는 중...\\r\\n dependency_smoke_test.cpp\\r\\n 컴파일하는 중...\\r\\n dependency_smoke_test.cpp\\r\\n fesa_dependency_smoke_test.vcxproj -> C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_dependency_smoke_test.exe\\r\\n Building Custom Rule C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/CMakeLists.txt\\r\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_28\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var focusedGreen3=run3('ctest',['--preset','windows-debug','-R','Core|Diagnostic|EntityId','--output-on-failure'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`FOCUSED_CTEST_EXIT=${focusedGreen3.status}\\\\n${focusedGreen3.stdout||''}${focusedGreen3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Run focused core tests\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_28\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var focusedGreen3=run3('ctest',['--preset','windows-debug','-R','Core|Diagnostic|EntityId','--output-on-failure'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`FOCUSED_CTEST_EXIT=${focusedGreen3.status}\\\\n${focusedGreen3.stdout||''}${focusedGreen3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Run focused core tests\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"FOCUSED_CTEST_EXIT=0\\nTest project C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/out/build/windows-debug\\n Start 3: CoreValueTypes\\n1/1 Test #3: CoreValueTypes ................... Passed 0.05 sec\\n\\n100% tests passed out of 1\\n\\nTotal Test time (real) = 0.14 sec\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_29\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"GREEN 단계에서 새 타깃이 경고 없이 빌드됐고 focused CTest가 1/1 통과했습니다. 다음으로 실제 diff를 검토해 불필요한 API가 없는지, `core` 헤더의 include 그래프에 MKL/TBB/HDF5/Abaqus가 없는지 확인한 뒤 전체 CTest를 다시 실행하겠습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.updated\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_18\",\"type\":\"todo_list\",\"items\":[{\"text\":\"필수 문서·계획·기존 코드와 clean baseline 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"Core 값 타입 GoogleTest를 먼저 추가하고 예상 RED 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"요구된 5개 core header를 최소 구현하고 GREEN 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"focused/전체 CTest와 외부 header 독립성 확인\",\"completed\":false},{\"text\":\"phase index를 completed/summary로 갱신하고 최종 diff 확인\",\"completed\":false}]}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_30\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var diffCheck3=run3('git',['diff','--check']); var diffStat3=run3('git',['diff','--stat']); var diffAll3=run3('git',['diff','--','include/fesa/core','tests/CMakeLists.txt','tests/unit/core']); var forbiddenIncludes3=run3('rg',['-n','#include\\\\s*[<\\\\\\\"](?:mkl|oneapi|tbb|hdf5|H5|abaqus)','include/fesa/core']); nodeRepl.write(`DIFF_CHECK_EXIT=${diffCheck3.status}\\\\n${diffCheck3.stdout||''}${diffCheck3.stderr||''}\\\\nFORBIDDEN_INCLUDE_EXIT=${forbiddenIncludes3.status}\\\\n${forbiddenIncludes3.stdout||''}${forbiddenIncludes3.stderr||''}\\\\n${diffStat3.stdout||''}\\\\n${diffAll3.stdout||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Review diff and dependency boundary\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_30\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var diffCheck3=run3('git',['diff','--check']); var diffStat3=run3('git',['diff','--stat']); var diffAll3=run3('git',['diff','--','include/fesa/core','tests/CMakeLists.txt','tests/unit/core']); var forbiddenIncludes3=run3('rg',['-n','#include\\\\s*[<\\\\\\\"](?:mkl|oneapi|tbb|hdf5|H5|abaqus)','include/fesa/core']); nodeRepl.write(`DIFF_CHECK_EXIT=${diffCheck3.status}\\\\n${diffCheck3.stdout||''}${diffCheck3.stderr||''}\\\\nFORBIDDEN_INCLUDE_EXIT=${forbiddenIncludes3.status}\\\\n${forbiddenIncludes3.stdout||''}${forbiddenIncludes3.stderr||''}\\\\n${diffStat3.stdout||''}\\\\n${diffAll3.stdout||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Review diff and dependency boundary\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"DIFF_CHECK_EXIT=0\\nwarning: in the working copy of 'tests/CMakeLists.txt', LF will be replaced by CRLF the next time Git touches it\\n\\nFORBIDDEN_INCLUDE_EXIT=1\\n\\n phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json | 5 +++--\\n tests/CMakeLists.txt | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++\\n 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\\n\\ndiff --git a/tests/CMakeLists.txt b/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\nindex a2a5538..bb4f70d 100644\\n--- a/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\n+++ b/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\n@@ -36,3 +36,24 @@ set_property(\\n PROPERTY ENVIRONMENT_MODIFICATION\\n ${FESA_DEPENDENCY_RUNTIME_MODIFICATIONS}\\n )\\n+\\n+add_executable(fesa_core_value_tests\\n+ unit/core/diagnostic_test.cpp\\n+ unit/core/entity_id_test.cpp\\n+ unit/core/status_test.cpp\\n+ unit/core/vec3_test.cpp\\n+)\\n+\\n+target_compile_features(fesa_core_value_tests PRIVATE cxx_std_20)\\n+target_compile_options(fesa_core_value_tests PRIVATE /W4 /permissive- /EHsc)\\n+\\n+target_link_libraries(fesa_core_value_tests\\n+ PRIVATE\\n+ fesa_core\\n+ GTest::gtest_main\\n+)\\n+\\n+add_test(\\n+ NAME CoreValueTypes\\n+ COMMAND \\\"$\\\"\\n+)\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_31\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var statusNow3=run3('git',['status','--short']); var untrackedFiles3=run3('rg',['--files','include/fesa/core','tests/unit/core']); nodeRepl.write(`STATUS\\\\n${statusNow3.stdout||''}\\\\nCORE_FILES\\\\n${untrackedFiles3.stdout||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Inspect all changed and new files\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_31\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var statusNow3=run3('git',['status','--short']); var untrackedFiles3=run3('rg',['--files','include/fesa/core','tests/unit/core']); nodeRepl.write(`STATUS\\\\n${statusNow3.stdout||''}\\\\nCORE_FILES\\\\n${untrackedFiles3.stdout||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Inspect all changed and new files\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"STATUS\\n M phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json\\n M tests/CMakeLists.txt\\n?? include/fesa/core/diagnostic.hpp\\n?? include/fesa/core/entity_id.hpp\\n?? include/fesa/core/source_location.hpp\\n?? include/fesa/core/status.hpp\\n?? include/fesa/core/vec3.hpp\\n?? tests/unit/core/\\n\\nCORE_FILES\\ntests/unit/core\\\\vec3_test.cpp\\ntests/unit/core\\\\status_test.cpp\\ntests/unit/core\\\\entity_id_test.cpp\\ntests/unit/core\\\\diagnostic_test.cpp\\ninclude/fesa/core\\\\version.hpp\\ninclude/fesa/core\\\\vec3.hpp\\ninclude/fesa/core\\\\status.hpp\\ninclude/fesa/core\\\\source_location.hpp\\ninclude/fesa/core\\\\entity_id.hpp\\ninclude/fesa/core\\\\diagnostic.hpp\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_32\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var fullGreen3=run3('ctest',['--preset','windows-debug','--output-on-failure'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`FULL_CTEST_EXIT=${fullGreen3.status}\\\\n${fullGreen3.stdout||''}${fullGreen3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Run complete CTest suite\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_32\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var fullGreen3=run3('ctest',['--preset','windows-debug','--output-on-failure'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`FULL_CTEST_EXIT=${fullGreen3.status}\\\\n${fullGreen3.stdout||''}${fullGreen3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Run complete CTest suite\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"FULL_CTEST_EXIT=0\\nTest project C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/out/build/windows-debug\\n Start 1: VersionCommand\\n1/3 Test #1: VersionCommand ................... Passed 0.03 sec\\n Start 2: DependencySmoke\\n2/3 Test #2: DependencySmoke .................. Passed 0.11 sec\\n Start 3: CoreValueTypes\\n3/3 Test #3: CoreValueTypes ................... Passed 0.01 sec\\n\\n100% tests passed out of 3\\n\\nTotal Test time (real) = 0.20 sec\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_33\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"지정 AC가 모두 통과했습니다: Debug 빌드 성공, focused CTest 1/1, 전체 CTest 3/3입니다. 외부-header 검색도 일치 항목이 0개였습니다. 이 검증 결과에 따라 Harness 규칙대로 Step 3을 `completed`로 바꾸고 다음 step에 필요한 한 줄 summary만 추가하겠습니다. timestamp는 executor 책임이므로 건드리지 않습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_34\",\"type\":\"file_change\",\"changes\":[{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\phases\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\index.json\",\"kind\":\"update\"}],\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_34\",\"type\":\"file_change\",\"changes\":[{\"path\":\"C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\phases\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\index.json\",\"kind\":\"update\"}],\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_35\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"완료 판정 전에 변경 범위를 AGENTS/아키텍처/테스트 계약과 대조하는 저장소 `review` 지침도 적용하겠습니다. Step 3은 작은 core 변경이지만, 새 public header와 CMake 등록이 포함되므로 자동 검증 외에 diff 기반 요구사항 누락을 확인하는 데 유용합니다. 사용자 지시대로 별도 agent나 커밋은 만들지 않고 현재 worktree를 직접 검토합니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_36\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var reviewSkill3=repo3+String.raw`\\\\.agents\\\\skills\\\\review\\\\SKILL.md`; nodeRepl.write(await fs3.readFile(reviewSkill3,'utf8'));\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read repository review checklist\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_36\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var reviewSkill3=repo3+String.raw`\\\\.agents\\\\skills\\\\review\\\\SKILL.md`; nodeRepl.write(await fs3.readFile(reviewSkill3,'utf8'));\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Read repository review checklist\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"---\\r\\nname: review\\r\\ndescription: Use when reviewing repository changes against AGENTS.md, architecture decisions, tests, and build requirements.\\r\\n---\\r\\n\\r\\n# Repository Review\\r\\n\\r\\n먼저 다음 문서를 읽는다.\\r\\n\\r\\n- `/AGENTS.md`\\r\\n- `/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`\\r\\n- `/docs/ADR.md`\\r\\n\\r\\n사용자가 범위를 지정하지 않으면 현재 작업 트리의 변경을 리뷰한다. 관련 diff를\\r\\n확인하고 가능한 빌드와 테스트 command를 실제로 실행한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n## 체크리스트\\r\\n\\r\\n1. MSVC toolset와 C++ 표준이 AGENTS.md/ADR과 일치하는가?\\r\\n2. CMake 또는 MSBuild Debug/x64 빌드가 통과하는가?\\r\\n3. CTest 또는 `.harness/config.json`의 명시적 test command가 통과하는가?\\r\\n4. 새 C/C++ 소스와 헤더에 대응 테스트가 있는가?\\r\\n5. CRITICAL 아키텍처 규칙과 public header 경계를 지키는가?\\r\\n\\r\\n## 출력 형식\\r\\n\\r\\n실제 결함을 심각도순으로 먼저 제시한다. 각 finding에 파일과 줄 번호, 영향,\\r\\n재현 또는 근거, 구체적인 수정 방안을 포함한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n그 뒤 다음 표를 제공한다.\\r\\n\\r\\n| 항목 | 결과 | 비고 |\\r\\n|------|------|------|\\r\\n| 아키텍처 준수 | ✅/❌/미검증 | 상세 |\\r\\n| 기술 스택 준수 | ✅/❌/미검증 | 상세 |\\r\\n| 테스트 존재 | ✅/❌/미검증 | 상세 |\\r\\n| CRITICAL 규칙 | ✅/❌/미검증 | 상세 |\\r\\n| 빌드 가능 | ✅/❌/미검증 | 상세 |\\r\\n\\r\\n실행할 수 없는 검사는 성공으로 추정하지 말고 `미검증`과 이유를 적는다. finding이\\r\\n없으면 발견된 문제가 없다고 명시하고 남아 있는 검증 공백을 설명한다.\\r\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_37\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var pytests3=run3('uv',['run','--with','pytest','python','-m','pytest','-v','-rs'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`PYTEST_EXIT=${pytests3.status}\\\\n${pytests3.stdout||''}${pytests3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Run Harness Python tests\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_37\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var pytests3=run3('uv',['run','--with','pytest','python','-m','pytest','-v','-rs'],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`PYTEST_EXIT=${pytests3.status}\\\\n${pytests3.stdout||''}${pytests3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Run Harness Python tests\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"PYTEST_EXIT=2\\nerror: Request failed after 3 retries in 8.8s\\n Caused by: Failed to fetch: `https://pypi.org/simple/pytest/`\\n Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/pytest/)\\n Caused by: client error (Connect)\\n Caused by: tcp connect error\\n Caused by: 연결할 수 없는 네트워크에서 소켓 작업을 시도했습니다. (os error 10051)\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_38\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"추가로 일반 Harness Python 검증도 시도했지만, `uv`가 `pytest`를 받기 위해 PyPI에 접근하는 단계에서 제한된 네트워크 때문에 3회 재시도 후 종료됐습니다. 이는 Step 3의 명시된 AC(CMake/CTest) 실패가 아니며 C++ 변경과도 무관하지만, 최종 보고에 검증 공백으로 명확히 남기겠습니다. 저장소 review는 필수 AC 결과를 기준으로 계속 진행합니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_39\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var coreExe3=repo3+String.raw`\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.exe`; var directCore3=run3(coreExe3,[],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`CORE_GTEST_EXIT=${directCore3.status}\\\\n${directCore3.stdout||''}${directCore3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Inspect individual core test results\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_39\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var coreExe3=repo3+String.raw`\\\\out\\\\build\\\\windows-debug\\\\tests\\\\Debug\\\\fesa_core_value_tests.exe`; var directCore3=run3(coreExe3,[],{timeout:180000}); nodeRepl.write(`CORE_GTEST_EXIT=${directCore3.status}\\\\n${directCore3.stdout||''}${directCore3.stderr||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":210000,\"title\":\"Inspect individual core test results\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"CORE_GTEST_EXIT=0\\nRunning main() from C:\\\\git\\\\googletest\\\\googletest\\\\src\\\\gtest_main.cc\\r\\n[==========] Running 7 tests from 4 test suites.\\r\\n[----------] Global test environment set-up.\\r\\n[----------] 2 tests from Diagnostic\\r\\n[ RUN ] Diagnostic.PreservesSourceLocation\\r\\n[ OK ] Diagnostic.PreservesSourceLocation (0 ms)\\r\\n[ RUN ] Diagnostic.AllowsDiagnosticsWithoutSourceLocation\\r\\n[ OK ] Diagnostic.AllowsDiagnosticsWithoutSourceLocation (0 ms)\\r\\n[----------] 2 tests from Diagnostic (0 ms total)\\r\\n\\r\\n[----------] 2 tests from EntityId\\r\\n[ RUN ] EntityId.PreservesValueAndSupportsTypedOrdering\\r\\n[ OK ] EntityId.PreservesValueAndSupportsTypedOrdering (0 ms)\\r\\n[ RUN ] EntityId.RejectsNegativeValues\\r\\n[ OK ] EntityId.RejectsNegativeValues (0 ms)\\r\\n[----------] 2 tests from EntityId (0 ms total)\\r\\n\\r\\n[----------] 2 tests from CoreStatus\\r\\n[ RUN ] CoreStatus.PreservesFailureDiagnostics\\r\\n[ OK ] CoreStatus.PreservesFailureDiagnostics (0 ms)\\r\\n[ RUN ] CoreStatus.RepresentsSuccessWithoutDiagnostics\\r\\n[ OK ] CoreStatus.RepresentsSuccessWithoutDiagnostics (0 ms)\\r\\n[----------] 2 tests from CoreStatus (0 ms total)\\r\\n\\r\\n[----------] 1 test from CoreVec3\\r\\n[ RUN ] CoreVec3.ReportsOnlyFiniteVectorsAsFinite\\r\\n[ OK ] CoreVec3.ReportsOnlyFiniteVectorsAsFinite (0 ms)\\r\\n[----------] 1 test from CoreVec3 (0 ms total)\\r\\n\\r\\n[----------] Global test environment tear-down\\r\\n[==========] 7 tests from 4 test suites ran. (0 ms total)\\r\\n[ PASSED ] 7 tests.\\r\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_40\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var indexObj3=JSON.parse(await fs3.readFile(repo3+String.raw`\\\\phases\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\index.json`,'utf8')); var stepState3=indexObj3.steps.find(x=>x.step===3); var finalDiffCheck3=run3('git',['diff','--check']); var finalStatus3=run3('git',['status','--short']); var finalTrackedDiff3=run3('git',['diff','--','phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json','tests/CMakeLists.txt']); var finalForbidden3=run3('rg',['-n','#include\\\\s*[<\\\\\\\"](?:mkl|oneapi|tbb|hdf5|H5|abaqus)','include/fesa/core']); nodeRepl.write(`INDEX_STEP=${JSON.stringify(stepState3)}\\\\nDIFF_CHECK_EXIT=${finalDiffCheck3.status}\\\\n${finalDiffCheck3.stdout||''}${finalDiffCheck3.stderr||''}\\\\nFORBIDDEN_INCLUDE_MATCH_EXIT=${finalForbidden3.status}\\\\n${finalForbidden3.stdout||''}${finalForbidden3.stderr||''}\\\\nSTATUS\\\\n${finalStatus3.stdout||''}\\\\nTRACKED_DIFF\\\\n${finalTrackedDiff3.stdout||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Perform final metadata and diff review\"},\"result\":null,\"error\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_40\",\"type\":\"mcp_tool_call\",\"server\":\"node_repl\",\"tool\":\"js\",\"arguments\":{\"code\":\"var indexObj3=JSON.parse(await fs3.readFile(repo3+String.raw`\\\\phases\\\\solver-bootstrap\\\\index.json`,'utf8')); var stepState3=indexObj3.steps.find(x=>x.step===3); var finalDiffCheck3=run3('git',['diff','--check']); var finalStatus3=run3('git',['status','--short']); var finalTrackedDiff3=run3('git',['diff','--','phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json','tests/CMakeLists.txt']); var finalForbidden3=run3('rg',['-n','#include\\\\s*[<\\\\\\\"](?:mkl|oneapi|tbb|hdf5|H5|abaqus)','include/fesa/core']); nodeRepl.write(`INDEX_STEP=${JSON.stringify(stepState3)}\\\\nDIFF_CHECK_EXIT=${finalDiffCheck3.status}\\\\n${finalDiffCheck3.stdout||''}${finalDiffCheck3.stderr||''}\\\\nFORBIDDEN_INCLUDE_MATCH_EXIT=${finalForbidden3.status}\\\\n${finalForbidden3.stdout||''}${finalForbidden3.stderr||''}\\\\nSTATUS\\\\n${finalStatus3.stdout||''}\\\\nTRACKED_DIFF\\\\n${finalTrackedDiff3.stdout||''}`);\",\"timeout_ms\":30000,\"title\":\"Perform final metadata and diff review\"},\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"INDEX_STEP={\\\"step\\\":3,\\\"name\\\":\\\"core-ids-and-diagnostics\\\",\\\"status\\\":\\\"completed\\\",\\\"summary\\\":\\\"Added dependency-free EntityId, Vec3 finiteness validation, SourceLocation/Diagnostic/Status headers, and core unit tests.\\\",\\\"started_at\\\":\\\"2026-07-30T12:53:17+0900\\\"}\\nDIFF_CHECK_EXIT=0\\nwarning: in the working copy of 'phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json', LF will be replaced by CRLF the next time Git touches it\\nwarning: in the working copy of 'tests/CMakeLists.txt', LF will be replaced by CRLF the next time Git touches it\\n\\nFORBIDDEN_INCLUDE_MATCH_EXIT=1\\n\\nSTATUS\\n M phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json\\n M tests/CMakeLists.txt\\n?? include/fesa/core/diagnostic.hpp\\n?? include/fesa/core/entity_id.hpp\\n?? include/fesa/core/source_location.hpp\\n?? include/fesa/core/status.hpp\\n?? include/fesa/core/vec3.hpp\\n?? tests/unit/core/\\n\\nTRACKED_DIFF\\ndiff --git a/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json b/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json\\nindex a013e4f..c88b9cc 100644\\n--- a/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json\\n+++ b/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json\\n@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@\\n {\\n \\\"step\\\": 3,\\n \\\"name\\\": \\\"core-ids-and-diagnostics\\\",\\n- \\\"status\\\": \\\"pending\\\"\\n+ \\\"status\\\": \\\"completed\\\",\\n+ \\\"summary\\\": \\\"Added dependency-free EntityId, Vec3 finiteness validation, SourceLocation/Diagnostic/Status headers, and core unit tests.\\\",\\n+ \\\"started_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-30T12:53:17+0900\\\"\\n }\\n ],\\n \\\"created_at\\\": \\\"2026-07-29T23:58:15+0900\\\"\\ndiff --git a/tests/CMakeLists.txt b/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\nindex a2a5538..bb4f70d 100644\\n--- a/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\n+++ b/tests/CMakeLists.txt\\n@@ -36,3 +36,24 @@ set_property(\\n PROPERTY ENVIRONMENT_MODIFICATION\\n ${FESA_DEPENDENCY_RUNTIME_MODIFICATIONS}\\n )\\n+\\n+add_executable(fesa_core_value_tests\\n+ unit/core/diagnostic_test.cpp\\n+ unit/core/entity_id_test.cpp\\n+ unit/core/status_test.cpp\\n+ unit/core/vec3_test.cpp\\n+)\\n+\\n+target_compile_features(fesa_core_value_tests PRIVATE cxx_std_20)\\n+target_compile_options(fesa_core_value_tests PRIVATE /W4 /permissive- /EHsc)\\n+\\n+target_link_libraries(fesa_core_value_tests\\n+ PRIVATE\\n+ fesa_core\\n+ GTest::gtest_main\\n+)\\n+\\n+add_test(\\n+ NAME CoreValueTypes\\n+ COMMAND \\\"$\\\"\\n+)\\n\"}],\"structured_content\":null},\"error\":null,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.updated\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_18\",\"type\":\"todo_list\",\"items\":[{\"text\":\"필수 문서·계획·기존 코드와 clean baseline 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"Core 값 타입 GoogleTest를 먼저 추가하고 예상 RED 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"요구된 5개 core header를 최소 구현하고 GREEN 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"focused/전체 CTest와 외부 header 독립성 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"phase index를 completed/summary로 갱신하고 최종 diff 확인\",\"completed\":true}]}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_41\",\"type\":\"agent_message\",\"text\":\"Step 3 구현을 완료했고 phase index를 `completed`로 갱신했습니다. 리뷰에서 발견된 결함은 없습니다.\\n\\n- [core headers](C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/include/fesa/core/entity_id.hpp): typed `EntityId`, `Vec3`, `SourceLocation`, `Diagnostic`, 최소 `Status` 구현\\n- [core tests](C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/tests/unit/core/entity_id_test.cpp): 암시 변환, 음수 ID, nonfinite 벡터, source 보존 등 GoogleTest 7개\\n- [phase index](C:/git/FESA/.worktrees/solver-bootstrap/phases/solver-bootstrap/index.json): Step 3 summary 및 `completed` 기록\\n\\n| 항목 | 결과 | 비고 |\\n|---|---|---|\\n| 아키텍처 준수 | ✅ | core는 표준 라이브러리에만 의존 |\\n| 기술 스택 준수 | ✅ | C++20/MSVC v145 Debug 빌드 |\\n| 테스트 존재 | ✅ | GoogleTest 7/7 |\\n| CRITICAL 규칙 | ✅ | 단위 변환, serialization, equation ID 추가 없음 |\\n| 빌드 가능 | ✅ | 새 MSVC 경고 없음 |\\n\\n검증 결과:\\n\\n- `cmake --build --preset windows-debug`: 성공\\n- Focused CTest: 1/1 통과\\n- 전체 CTest: 3/3 통과\\n- 외부 MKL/TBB/HDF5/Abaqus include 검색: 0건\\n- `git diff --check`: 성공\\n\\n추가 Harness pytest는 제한된 네트워크 때문에 `pytest`를 PyPI에서 가져오지 못해 실행되지 않았습니다. Step 3의 명시된 CMake/CTest AC는 모두 통과했습니다. 커밋은 생성하지 않았습니다.\"}}\n{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_18\",\"type\":\"todo_list\",\"items\":[{\"text\":\"필수 문서·계획·기존 코드와 clean baseline 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"Core 값 타입 GoogleTest를 먼저 추가하고 예상 RED 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"요구된 5개 core header를 최소 구현하고 GREEN 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"focused/전체 CTest와 외부 header 독립성 확인\",\"completed\":true},{\"text\":\"phase index를 completed/summary로 갱신하고 최종 diff 확인\",\"completed\":true}]}}\n{\"type\":\"turn.completed\",\"usage\":{\"input_tokens\":2158269,\"cached_input_tokens\":2050560,\"cache_write_input_tokens\":0,\"output_tokens\":16299,\"reasoning_output_tokens\":8687}}\n",
+ "stderr": "2026-07-30T03:53:41.010487Z ERROR codex_core::exec: exec error: windows sandbox: runner failed during SpawnChild: CreateProcessAsUserW failed: 5 (액세스가 거부되었습니다.) | cwd=C:\\git\\FESA\\.worktrees\\solver-bootstrap | cmd=\"C:\\Program Files\\WindowsApps\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\pwsh.exe\" -NoProfile -Command \"try { [Console]::OutputEncoding=[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8 } catch {}\nGet-Content -Raw 'C:\\Users\\baram\\.codex\\plugins\\cache\\openai-curated-remote\\superpowers\\6.2.0\\skills\\using-superpowers\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw '.agents\\skills\\harness\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\Users\\baram\\.codex\\plugins\\cache\\openai-curated-remote\\superpowers\\6.2.0\\skills\\test-driven-development\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\Users\\baram\\.codex\\plugins\\cache\\openai-curated-remote\\superpowers\\6.2.0\\skills\\verification-before-completion\\SKILL.md'\" | env_u16_len=6601 | si_flags=256 | creation_flags=525312 (Windows error 5)\n2026-07-30T03:53:41.010987Z ERROR codex_core::tools::router: error=execution error: Io(Custom { kind: Other, error: \"windows sandbox: runner failed during SpawnChild: CreateProcessAsUserW failed: 5 (액세스가 거부되었습니다.) | cwd=C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap | cmd=\\\"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\WindowsApps\\\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\\\pwsh.exe\\\" -NoProfile -Command \\\"try { [Console]::OutputEncoding=[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8 } catch {}\\nGet-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\using-superpowers\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw '.agents\\\\skills\\\\harness\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\test-driven-development\\\\SKILL.md'; Get-Content -Raw 'C:\\\\Users\\\\baram\\\\.codex\\\\plugins\\\\cache\\\\openai-curated-remote\\\\superpowers\\\\6.2.0\\\\skills\\\\verification-before-completion\\\\SKILL.md'\\\" | env_u16_len=6601 | si_flags=256 | creation_flags=525312 (Windows error 5)\" })\n2026-07-30T03:53:46.669525Z ERROR codex_core::exec: exec error: windows sandbox: runner failed during SpawnChild: CreateProcessAsUserW failed: 5 (액세스가 거부되었습니다.) | cwd=C:\\git\\FESA\\.worktrees\\solver-bootstrap | cmd=\"C:\\Program Files\\WindowsApps\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\pwsh.exe\" -NoProfile -Command \"try { [Console]::OutputEncoding=[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8 } catch {}\nGet-Location\" | env_u16_len=6601 | si_flags=256 | creation_flags=525312 (Windows error 5)\n2026-07-30T03:53:46.669773Z ERROR codex_core::tools::router: error=execution error: Io(Custom { kind: Other, error: \"windows sandbox: runner failed during SpawnChild: CreateProcessAsUserW failed: 5 (액세스가 거부되었습니다.) | cwd=C:\\\\git\\\\FESA\\\\.worktrees\\\\solver-bootstrap | cmd=\\\"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\WindowsApps\\\\Microsoft.PowerShell_7.6.4.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe\\\\pwsh.exe\\\" -NoProfile -Command \\\"try { [Console]::OutputEncoding=[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8 } catch {}\\nGet-Location\\\" | env_u16_len=6601 | si_flags=256 | creation_flags=525312 (Windows error 5)\" })\n"
+}
\ No newline at end of file