modify documents

2026-09-05 15:14:21 +09:00
parent 31dac85192
commit 97e4d7a971
79 changed files with 4570 additions and 2787 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+---
+name: fem-physics-review
+description: Use when validated structural FEM results need an independent physical-plausibility review before release-readiness evaluation.
+---
+
+# FEM Physics Review
+
+Determine whether numerically passing results also satisfy the documented physical behavior of the modeled problem.
+
+## Inputs
+
+- Requirements, formulation, numerical review, reference model, and I/O contract
+- Passing implementation-owned build/test and comparison evidence required by the feature
+- Solver outputs and approved reference artifacts, read-only
+
+## Workflow
+
+1. Confirm prerequisite evidence is passing, current, and tied to the same `feature_id` and contract revision.
+2. Evaluate only documented expectations: global equilibrium, reactions, deformation direction/mode, symmetry or zeros, internal-force balance, stress/strain signs and coordinates, conservation, residuals, energy, and family-specific behavior.
+3. Check coverage is sufficient for the claimed feature scope; distinguish a solver defect from formulation, I/O, acceptance-model, or evidence gaps.
+4. Report findings before the verdict and route each failure to its owning stage.
+
+Read the applicable [analysis-family guidance](../fem-formulation-spec/references/analysis-families.md). Use [evidence and handoff](../fem-requirements-baseline/references/evidence-and-handoff.md) for the verdict and [workflow and decision authority](../fem-requirements-baseline/references/workflow-and-decisions.md) for missing physical expectations.
+
+## Output
+
+Follow [Feature document management](../../../docs/FEATURE_DOCUMENTATION.md): read the Coordinator's
+feature context, keep main reports concise, and link necessary owned details in the same feature folder.
+
+Create or revise `docs/<feature-id>/physics-evaluation.md` with evidence identity, checks and expected relations, observed results, failure classification, coverage assessment, verdict, residual risks, and handoff.
+
+## Evidence
+
+Each check states its governing relation or approved expectation, data source, units/coordinates, calculation, tolerance source where applicable, and pass/fail result. Explain why a check is inapplicable rather than silently omitting it.
+
+## Boundary
+
+Do not edit code, tests, requirements, formulations, I/O contracts, reference models, reference artifacts, or tolerances. Do not invent extra acceptance gates, approve numerical comparison, run external solvers, or approve release. A physics pass means ready for release-readiness audit only.