baram2584/FESADev
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update agent, skill and scripts

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
KOKO\Mimi
2026-09-07 01:15:26 +09:00
parent 42a4847da5
commit d7e9629640
38 changed files with 476 additions and 2946 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.codex/skills/fem-requirements-baseline/references/workflow-and-decisions.md
+3 -3
View File
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Proceed without user review for reversible choices within approved contracts: in
## User decisions
Return `needs-user-decision` only for a choice that changes at least one of:
Ask the user only for a choice that changes at least one of:
- supported physics, formulation meaning, or analysis scope;
- public compatibility or an authoritative I/O schema;
@@ -28,6 +28,6 @@ Return `needs-user-decision` only for a choice that changes at least one of:
Everything else follows the authority order. Lack of a preference is not a blocker when a deterministic in-contract choice exists.
## Contract flow
## Responsibilities
Requirements own acceptance intent; research owns evidence; formulation owns mathematics; numerical review owns independent numerical findings and logical verification coverage; I/O owns external/internal mappings; implementation owns code and tests; physics review owns physical plausibility; release review owns closure evidence. A downstream stage returns a defect to the owning upstream stage instead of silently rewriting its contract.
Requirements own acceptance intent; research owns evidence; formulation owns mathematics; numerical review owns independent numerical findings and verification coverage; I/O owns mappings; implementation owns code and tests; and physics review owns plausibility findings. Use only the expertise needed by the task. Do not silently rewrite another owner's contract to make downstream work pass.