modify documents
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: fesa-readiness
|
||||
description: Check FESA Phase 1 readiness before implementation planning or coding, especially reference artifacts, MITC4 open decisions, result outputs, and build-system blockers.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# FESA Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
Use this skill before drafting implementation phases, starting solver code, or deciding whether Phase 1 can proceed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Read First
|
||||
|
||||
- `/AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- `/PROGRESS.md`
|
||||
- `/PLAN.md`
|
||||
- `/docs/README.md`
|
||||
- `/docs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.md`
|
||||
- `/docs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.md`
|
||||
- `/docs/MITC4_FORMULATION.md`
|
||||
- `/docs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.md`
|
||||
- `/docs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Compare `/PLAN.md` Phase 1 readiness tasks with the Implementation Readiness Checklist in `/docs/README.md`.
|
||||
2. Classify each item as ready, blocked, explicitly deferred, or unknown.
|
||||
3. Confirm that reference artifacts under `references/` do not require local Abaqus execution.
|
||||
4. Confirm that at least one `*_displacements.csv` can drive automated `U` comparison, and flag missing `RF` artifacts if reaction verification depends on Abaqus output.
|
||||
5. Confirm that MITC4 baseline formulation decisions are not being filled from memory.
|
||||
6. Identify the smallest next decision or artifact needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
- Lead with the readiness verdict: ready, blocked, or partial.
|
||||
- Include blockers and the exact files that should be updated.
|
||||
- If work is completed during the turn, update `PROGRESS.md`.
|
||||
- If future tasks change, update `PLAN.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Do Not
|
||||
|
||||
- Do not start implementation while unresolved readiness blockers remain unless the user explicitly accepts them as deferred.
|
||||
- Do not treat undocumented formulas or reference values as authoritative.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user