13 KiB
PROGRESS
Purpose
PROGRESS.md is the shared chronological status log for FESA agents.
Every new agent session must read this file together with PLAN.md before planning or editing. Keep this file factual: what changed, what was verified, what is blocked, and what remains risky.
How To Use
- Add a new entry whenever a meaningful planning, documentation, implementation, verification, or review task is completed.
- Include date, agent or author when known, changed files, verification performed, and follow-up items.
- Record blockers explicitly.
- Do not use this file as a future task list. Put future tasks in
PLAN.md. - Do not remove history unless the user explicitly asks for archival cleanup.
Current Status
The project is in documentation and readiness planning. Solver implementation has not started. The first stored Abaqus reference pair exists under references/: quad_01.inp and quad_01_displacements.csv.
Completed Work
2026-05-01 - Phase 1 implementation master plan added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
PLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Expanded
PLAN.mdfrom a short implementation sequence into a Phase 1 master implementation plan. - Added Phase 1 Definition of Done, execution gates, milestone backlog P1-00 through P1-16, sprint contract rules, verification strategy, reference plan, and risk controls.
- Kept implementation blocked behind readiness decisions for MITC4 formulation, build system, reference comparator, reaction verification, and Phase 1-compatible reference input.
- Aligned the plan with the Planner -> Generator -> Evaluator harness in
docs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.md.
Verification:
- Reviewed the plan against
docs/PRD.md,docs/ARCHITECTURE.md,docs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.md,docs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.md,docs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.md,docs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.md,docs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.md, anddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.md. python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Convert P1 milestones into
phases/step files with sprint contract sections when the user asks for executable phase planning.
2026-05-01 - Planner/Generator/Evaluator harness structure added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
AGENTS.mdPLAN.mdPROGRESS.mdREADME.mddocs/README.mddocs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/harness-sprint-planner.toml.codex/agents/implementation-generator.toml.codex/agents/harness-sprint-evaluator.toml.codex/agents/phase-planner.toml.codex/agents/harness-reviewer.toml.codex/agents/test-strategy-reviewer.toml.codex/skills/fesa-phase-planning/SKILL.md.codex/skills/fesa-review/SKILL.md.codex/skills/fesa-cpp-tdd/SKILL.mdplugins/fesa-commands/commands/phase-draft.md
Summary:
- Added
docs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.mdas the durable Planner -> Generator -> Evaluator contract for long-running FESA work. - Updated
AGENTS.mdso nontrivial solver, parser, result schema, reference comparator, MITC4, and phase execution work requires a sprint contract before implementation. - Added custom agents for sprint contract planning, contract-bound implementation, and independent sprint evaluation.
- Updated existing planner/reviewer/test strategy guidance to enforce contract compliance, evaluator pass/fail review, TDD, and PLAN/PROGRESS handoff.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.- Codex skill and plugin command frontmatter checks passed.
python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- When implementation planning begins, generate phase steps with sprint contract sections before assigning Generator work.
2026-05-01 - Abaqus reference CSV contract adopted
Author: Codex
Changed files:
AGENTS.mdREADME.mdPLAN.mdPROGRESS.mddocs/README.mddocs/PRD.mddocs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/ADR.mddocs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.mddocs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.mddocs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.mddocs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.mddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.mdreferences/README.md.codex/agents/*.toml.codex/skills/*.mdplugins/fesa-commands/commands/*.md
Summary:
- Accepted
references/as the project reference artifact root. - Documented the initial artifact pair
references/quad_01.inpandreferences/quad_01_displacements.csv. - Adopted Abaqus-exported
*_displacements.csvas the first automated displacement comparison format. - Mapped CSV columns
Node Label,U-U1,U-U2,U-U3,UR-UR1,UR-UR2,UR-UR3to FESAUcomponentsUX,UY,UZ,RX,RY,RZ. - Documented that
quad_01.inpincludesS4R,Part/Assembly/Instance,*Density, andNLGEOM=YES; it is stored reference provenance and a future compatibility target, not a Phase 1 parser acceptance expansion.
Verification:
- Inspected
quad_01_displacements.csv: 121 data rows and the required Abaqus displacement/rotation columns. - Parsed documentation and Codex extension metadata checks.
python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Add or define reaction-force reference artifacts, preferably
*_reactions.csv, or verifyRFby equilibrium tests until Abaqus RF CSV is available. - Add at least one Phase 1-compatible
TYPE=S4reference input for the first MITC4 linear static implementation path.
2026-05-01 - FESA commands converted to repo plugin
Author: Codex
Changed files:
plugins/fesa-commands/.codex-plugin/plugin.jsonplugins/fesa-commands/commands/*.md.agents/plugins/marketplace.json.codex/commands/*.md.codex/hooks/pre_edit_policy.py.codex/hooks/post_tool_use_policy.pyPLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Created the repo-local
fesa-commandsplugin and registered it in.agents/plugins/marketplace.json. - Moved the FESA command prompts from
.codex/commands/intoplugins/fesa-commands/commands/. - Removed the old
.codex/commands/*.mdfiles so plugin commands are the single maintained location. - Updated hook policy scripts to watch plugin manifests, plugin commands, and marketplace registration files.
- Resolved the prior
.codex/commandsdiscovery concern by converting the commands to plugin form.
Verification:
- Parsed plugin manifests and
.agents/plugins/marketplace.jsonwith Pythonjson. - Checked plugin command Markdown frontmatter.
- Parsed
.codex/config.tomland.codex/agents/*.tomlwith Pythontomllib. - Parsed
.codex/hooks.jsonwith Pythonjson. python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Confirm that the
fesa-commandsplugin appears in the active Codex plugin/command surface.
2026-05-01 - Project-local Codex extension pack added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
.codex/config.toml.codex/hooks.json.codex/agents/*.toml.codex/commands/*.md.codex/skills/*/SKILL.md.codex/hooks/*.pyPLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Added focused project agents for reference artifact curation, numerical convention review, solver architecture, sparse solver design, HDF5 results schema, DOF/boundary conditions, C++ build planning, MITC4 implementation review, test strategy, and PLAN/PROGRESS auditing.
- Added project command prompts for status, readiness, plan sync, reference checks, documentation guards, phase drafting, ADR work, benchmark onboarding, extension verification, and handoff.
- Added project-local FESA skills and registered them through
.codex/config.toml. - Added hooks for session startup context, pre-edit coordination reminders, post-edit validation reminders, and expanded destructive shell command blocking.
Verification:
- Parsed
.codex/config.tomland.codex/agents/*.tomlwith Pythontomllib. - Parsed
.codex/hooks.jsonwith Pythonjson. - Checked
.codex/skills/*/SKILL.mdand.codex/commands/*.mdfrontmatter. - Smoke-tested the new hook scripts with representative JSON payloads.
python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Resolved later by converting
.codex/commands/*.mdinto thefesa-commandsrepo plugin. - Confirm hook behavior in the actual Codex runtime on native Windows.
2026-05-01 - PLAN/PROGRESS coordination files added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
PLAN.mdPROGRESS.mdAGENTS.mddocs/README.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/phase-planner.toml.codex/agents/harness-reviewer.toml
Summary:
- Added
PLAN.mdas the shared forward-looking work plan for multi-agent coordination. - Added
PROGRESS.mdas the shared chronological progress, verification, blocker, and risk log. - Updated
AGENTS.mdso every new work session must readPROGRESS.mdandPLAN.mdbefore planning or editing. - Updated documentation index and Codex agent instructions so planning/review agents enforce PLAN/PROGRESS usage.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
2026-05-01 - Documentation coordination and multi-agent planning state
Author: Codex
Changed files:
AGENTS.mdREADME.mddocs/README.mddocs/PRD.mddocs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/ADR.mddocs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.mddocs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.mddocs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.mddocs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.mddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/*.toml
Summary:
- Added
docs/README.mdas documentation index and implementation readiness gate. - Reinforced Phase 1 invariants across project docs.
- Added readiness gates for numerical conventions, parser acceptance, reference onboarding, mandatory result outputs, and MITC4 pre-implementation decisions.
- Updated Codex agent definitions so delegated agents read the current documentation set.
- Root
README.mdnow points to the FESA documentation entry point.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Keep
PLAN.mdandPROGRESS.mdcurrent for multi-agent coordination.
2026-04-22 - Technical dossier documents added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
docs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.mddocs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.mddocs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.mddocs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.mddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mdAGENTS.mddocs/PRD.mddocs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/ADR.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/*.toml
Summary:
- Captured user decisions: 6 DOF shell nodes, artificial drilling stiffness, Abaqus-style units and signs, constrained DOF elimination, full-vector reaction recovery, no Phase 1 mesh quality diagnostics, singular diagnostics required,
double, int64 indexing, S4-to-MITC4 mapping, S4R deferral. - Added technical dossier documents for numerical conventions, Abaqus subset, verification, results schema, and MITC4 formulation.
- Added ADRs for numerical baseline, boundary/reaction policy, drilling stabilization, S4/S4R policy, singular diagnostics, and technical dossier contracts.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
2026-04-21 - Initial architecture and agent setup
Author: Codex
Changed files:
docs/PRD.mddocs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/ADR.mdAGENTS.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/fem-literature-researcher.toml.codex/agents/verification-benchmark-researcher.toml.codex/agents/mitc4-formulation-researcher.toml.codex/agents/abaqus-compatibility-researcher.toml
Summary:
- Established solver architecture direction: runtime polymorphism, Strategy + Template Method, Factory + Registry, adapter boundaries, immutable
Domain, mutableAnalysisState,DofManagerownership, step/frame/history results. - Created first research agents for FEM literature, verification benchmarks, MITC4 formulation, and Abaqus compatibility.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Known Blockers
- No reaction-force reference artifact exists yet under
references/. - The current initial
quad_01.inpreference containsS4R,Part/Assembly/Instance,*Density, andNLGEOM=YES, so it is not a Phase 1 parser acceptance case as-is. - MITC4 transverse shear tying-point equations are not finalized in
docs/MITC4_FORMULATION.md. - MITC4 local shell basis algorithm is not finalized.
- Artificial drilling stiffness default scale is not finalized.
- Build system is not decided.
- Validation script has no concrete build/lint/test commands configured.
Current Risks
- Implementation could start from the
quad_01reference input without accounting for its unsupported Abaqus features. - MITC4 formulation could drift if tying-point equations are inferred from memory instead of cited sources.
- Reaction output may be wrong if full-space stiffness/load data is not preserved or reconstructed.
- Large-model support may be weakened if any module narrows ids or sparse indices below int64.