Files
MultiPhysicsVault/wiki/concepts/Midas Civil Numerical Analysis Model.md
T
김경종 553842ac3b
Tests / Hermetic test suite (push) Has been cancelled
Tests / Skill frontmatter validation (push) Has been cancelled
modify wiki
2026-06-02 16:57:41 +09:00

2.6 KiB

type, title, created, updated, address, aliases, tags, status, related, sources, source_refs
type title created updated address aliases tags status related sources source_refs
concept Midas Civil Numerical Analysis Model 2026-06-02 2026-06-02 c-000159
MIDAS Civil numerical model
midas Civil analysis model
concept
finite-element-method
midas-civil
modeling
current
Midas-Civil-Analysis-Reference
midas Civil
Finite Element Method
Finite Element Program Implementation
Finite Element Modeling and Convergence Checks
Midas-Civil-Analysis-Reference
source raw_path raw_files md_indices match confidence
Midas-Civil-Analysis-Reference .raw/MidasCivilAnalysisReference/
MidasCivilAnalysisReference_057.md
57
heuristic-heading-keyword low

Midas Civil Numerical Analysis Model

Definition

Midas Civil numerical analysis model is the structural model abstraction described in the Midas-Civil-Analysis-Reference: nodes locate the structure, finite elements convert members and continua into numerical data, and boundary conditions describe connection to adjacent bodies or supports.

How It Works

The manual emphasizes three coordinate layers. Global coordinates define the model reference frame. Element coordinates define member or element-local quantities. Node local coordinates let users prescribe constraints, boundary springs, displacements, and reactions in arbitrary directions.

The model is intentionally simplified from the real structure. The manual's practical warning is that simplification must stay inside the analysis purpose: element type, mesh idealization, member offsets, boundary assumptions, and local axes can strongly change the computed response.

Solver Development Notes

  • Input data should separate nodes, element connectivity, element type, material, stiffness/section data, and boundary/link definitions.
  • Coordinate transformations are first-class data, not postprocessing details.
  • A custom solver needs diagnostics for missing stiffness, inconsistent local axes, overconstraints, and boundary assumptions.
  • Verification should include model-equivalence checks: same physical bridge member modeled with different element or offset choices should be compared intentionally.

Connections