add pdftomd
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Review core project documents for consistency with fixed decisions
|
||||
argument-hint: [scope]
|
||||
allowed-tools: [Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, Edit]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /review-project-docs
|
||||
|
||||
Review project documents for contradictions, stale decisions, and missing constraints.
|
||||
|
||||
## Arguments
|
||||
|
||||
The user invoked this command with: $ARGUMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read `PLAN.md` and `PROGRESS.md`.
|
||||
2. Read the requested document scope, defaulting to `AGENTS.md`, `PRD.md`, `ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/KNOWLEDGEBASE.md`.
|
||||
3. Check for contradictions against fixed decisions: MinerU 3.1.0 only, local-only, direct CLI execution, CLI-internal temporary local `mineru-api` allowed, no `--api-url` or remote API path, Python 3.12, uv, Obsidian Markdown, metadata JSON, and `.report.md`.
|
||||
4. Report findings first with file and line references.
|
||||
5. If edits are requested, make only surgical documentation changes and update `PROGRESS.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Guardrails
|
||||
|
||||
- Do not add speculative features, alternate engines, web UI, cloud OCR, or manual review queues.
|
||||
- Do not rewrite unrelated prose while fixing one inconsistency.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user