Step 3: source-review-outline

Read First

/AGENTS.md
/docs/PRD.md
/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md
/docs/ADR.md
/docs/UI_GUIDE.md
/docs/RESEARCH_LOG.md
/docs/REPORT_DRAFT.md
/phases/0-report-generation/index.json

Task

Review docs/RESEARCH_LOG.md for source quality, source freshness, conflicts, weak claims, and missing evidence. Then create or refine the report outline in docs/REPORT_DRAFT.md.

The outline must reflect the report purpose, keywords, direction, audience, and output format from docs/PRD.md. Include placeholders for key claims, supporting sources, risks, uncertainty, and feedback questions.

Acceptance Criteria

python scripts/validate_workspace.py

Verification

Run the acceptance command.
Confirm the outline follows docs/UI_GUIDE.md.
Confirm major sections have evidence sources or explicit evidence gaps.
Update this step in phases/0-report-generation/index.json.

Do Not

Do not hide source weaknesses because they are inconvenient.
Do not delete useful research history from docs/RESEARCH_LOG.md.
Do not write polished conclusions that are not supported by the reviewed sources.

1.1 KiB Raw Blame History