24 KiB
PROGRESS
Purpose
PROGRESS.md is the shared chronological status log for FESA agents.
Every new agent session must read this file together with PLAN.md before planning or editing. Keep this file factual: what changed, what was verified, what is blocked, and what remains risky.
How To Use
- Add a new entry whenever a meaningful planning, documentation, implementation, verification, or review task is completed.
- Include date, agent or author when known, changed files, verification performed, and follow-up items.
- Record blockers explicitly.
- Do not use this file as a future task list. Put future tasks in
PLAN.md. - Do not remove history unless the user explicitly asks for archival cleanup.
Current Status
Phase 1 has a new rebaseline phase definition in phases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline. Step 0 is complete and captured in phases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step0-audit.md. The old phases/1-linear-static-mitc4 path is historical and superseded after the MITC4 formulation reset. P1-01 through P1-14 have an initial C++17 implementation, but it is no longer authoritative until each layer is revalidated against the revised paper-based docs/MITC4_FORMULATION.md. quad_02 is now the stored S4 reference pair, but its Part/Assembly/Instance and *Density features remain a compatibility decision for rebaseline step 1.
Completed Work
2026-05-04 - P1R-00 rebaseline audit completed
Author: Codex
Changed files:
phases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step0-audit.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/index.jsonPLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Audited the existing C++ Phase 1 implementation against the revised paper-based
docs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mdwithout changing production solver behavior. - Classified reusable scaffolding for revalidation: CMake/CTest validation, core aliases, DOF mapping, diagnostics, parser/domain skeleton, in-memory
U/RFresults, displacement CSV comparator, full-vector reaction recovery, and the linear static workflow. - Identified MITC4 conflicts requiring rebuild: averaged-edge local basis, 2D projected Jacobian, direct Cartesian-like shear row construction, membrane/bending/shear pre-integration, midsurface-only
2 x 2integration, and old1.0e-6drilling stabilization. - Preserved the compatibility decision that
quad_02.inpis an S4 reference artifact but still containsPart/Assembly/Instanceand*Density, so Step 1 must choose a normalized-input or explicit parser-compatibility path.
Verification:
- Inspected
include/fesa/fesa.hpp,tests/test_main.cpp, current reference files, and active rebaseline phase contracts. python scripts/validate_workspace.pyconfigured CMake, builtfesa_coreandfesa_tests, and ran CTest successfully.
Follow-up:
- Continue with P1R-01 reference onboarding.
- Revalidate retained scaffolding in its assigned steps before treating it as Phase 1 evidence.
2026-05-04 - Phase 1 rebaseline steps redefined
Author: Codex
Changed files:
phases/index.jsonphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/index.jsonphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step0.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step1.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step2.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step3.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step4.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step5.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step6.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step7.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step8.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step9.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step10.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step11.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step12.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step13.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step14.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/step15.mdPLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Added a new 16-step Phase 1 rebaseline phase that supersedes the old Phase 1 execution path while preserving the old phase as historical record.
- Split the redo into audit, reference onboarding, core guardrails, parser/domain, validation diagnostics, DOF/reaction foundation, results/comparator, MITC4 geometry, MITC4 covariant strain tying, material/integration, stiffness/drilling, patch benchmarks, assembly, linear static workflow, stored-reference regression, and evaluator closeout.
- Updated
PLAN.mdso new agents executephases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaselineand treat the old1-linear-static-mitc4phase as blocked/superseded. - Kept unresolved decisions visible:
quad_02normalization versus explicit parser compatibility sprint, RF CSV availability, and the PRD target of three stored Phase 1 reference cases.
Verification:
- Parsed
phases/index.jsonandphases/1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaseline/index.jsonwith PowerShellConvertFrom-Json. - Verified all 16 rebaseline step files contain the required sprint contract sections from
docs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.md. python scripts/validate_workspace.pyconfigured CMake, builtfesa_coreandfesa_tests, and ran CTest successfully.- CTest result: 1 test executable passed.
Follow-up:
- Start with
python scripts/execute.py 1-linear-static-mitc4-rebaselinewhen ready. - Step 1 must resolve how to use
quad_02without silently expanding parser support.
2026-05-04 - MITC4 formulation reset from local papers
Author: Codex
Changed files:
docs/Paper/docs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mddocs/ADR.mddocs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.mddocs/README.mddocs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.mddocs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.mdreferences/quad_02.inpreferences/quad_02_displacements.csvPLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Read the local MITC4 paper set under
docs/Paper/and rewrotedocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mdas the new Phase 1 formulation contract. - Replaced the earlier simplified baseline with degenerated-continuum geometry, convected covariant strain components, FESA/Abaqus S4 tying-point convention, MITC transverse shear interpolation, local/global six-DOF rotation transformation,
2 x 2 x 2Gauss integration, and thesis-backed drilling stabilization usingdrilling_stiffness_scale = 1.0e-3. - Updated ADR-018, numerical conventions, and documentation readiness notes so the old
1.0e-6averaged-edge baseline is no longer the active rule. - Recorded
quad_02as the new stored S4 reference pair while keeping itsPart/Assembly/Instanceand*Densityfeatures outside automatic Phase 1 parser acceptance. - Updated
PLAN.mdso the next work is a Phase 1 redo/rebaseline, not continuation of the old P1-15/P1-16 path.
Verification:
python scripts/validate_workspace.pyconfigured CMake, builtfesa_coreandfesa_tests, and ran CTest successfully.- CTest result: 1 test executable passed.
Follow-up:
- Draft new Phase 1 redo sprint contracts against the revised MITC4 formulation before modifying solver code.
- Decide whether
quad_02.inpshould be normalized into the current parser subset or used to justify a dedicated Abaqus/CAEPart/Assembly/Instanceparser sprint. - Decide whether Phase 1
RFgets Abaqus*_reactions.csvartifacts or remains verified by full-vector equilibrium tests.
2026-05-01 - P1-01 through P1-14 implementation pass
Author: Codex
Changed files:
CMakeLists.txtinclude/fesa/fesa.hppsrc/fesa.cpptests/test_main.cppscripts/validate_workspace.pyREADME.mddocs/ADR.mddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mdPLAN.mdPROGRESS.mdphases/index.jsonphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/index.json
Summary:
- Added a CMake/CTest C++17 build and test harness, and updated
scripts/validate_workspace.pyto run CMake configure, build, and CTest directly. - Added core numeric aliases, DOF mapping, diagnostics, Domain entities, Abaqus Phase 1 parser, Domain validation, DofManager, dense test matrix, deterministic Gaussian solver, in-memory result model, displacement CSV loader/comparator, MITC4 baseline stiffness kernel, full-system assembly, and
LinearStaticAnalysis. - Closed the Phase 1 MITC4 baseline decisions in
docs/MITC4_FORMULATION.md: midside shear tying interpolation, averaged-edge local basis, 2x2 integration,drilling_stiffness_scale = 1.0e-6, and mandatoryU/RFoutput scope. - Added ADR-017 for the CMake/CTest build harness and ADR-018 for the Phase 1 MITC4 baseline closure.
- Added tests for parser acceptance/rejection,
quad_01unsupported provenance, validation diagnostics, DOF reconstruction, singular solve diagnostics, result fields, CSV loading/comparison, MITC4 shape/stiffness behavior, and end-to-end linear static RF recovery. - Marked phase steps P1-01 through P1-14 completed in
phases/1-linear-static-mitc4/index.json. - Marked P1-15 blocked because no Phase 1-compatible Abaqus S4 reference case exists yet; P1-16 remains pending behind that blocker.
Verification:
python scripts/validate_workspace.pyconfigured CMake, builtfesa_coreandfesa_tests, and ran CTest successfully.- CTest result: 1 test executable passed, covering 12 named in-repo test cases.
Follow-up:
- Add at least one Phase 1-compatible Abaqus
TYPE=S4linear static input and matching*_displacements.csv. - Add or explicitly defer
*_reactions.csv; current RF validation is by internal full-vector equilibrium/reaction tests. - After reference artifacts are added, unblock P1-15 and run stored-reference regression, then complete P1-16 evaluator closeout.
2026-05-01 - P1-00 Phase 1 sprint contracts generated
Author: Codex
Changed files:
phases/index.jsonphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/index.jsonphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step0.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step1.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step2.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step3.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step4.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step5.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step6.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step7.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step8.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step9.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step10.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step11.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step12.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step13.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step14.mdphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/step15.mdPLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Converted Phase 1 milestones P1-01 through P1-16 into executable Harness step files under
phases/1-linear-static-mitc4. - Added top-level and phase-level JSON indices using the zero-based
scripts/execute.pyconvention. - Embedded sprint contracts in every step with objective, required reading, scope, allowed files, explicit non-goals, tests to write first, reference-artifact policy, acceptance command, evaluator checklist, and handoff requirements.
- Kept readiness blockers visible, especially MITC4 formulation decisions, build-system selection, reference comparator tolerance, missing reaction CSV, and the need for Phase 1-compatible
TYPE=S4references. - Updated
PLAN.mdso new agents can find and execute the active phase files.
Verification:
- Parsed
phases/index.jsonandphases/1-linear-static-mitc4/index.jsonwith PowerShellConvertFrom-Json. - Verified the phase registry points to
1-linear-static-mitc4, all 16 steps arepending, step names are kebab-case, and everystepN.mdfile exists. - Verified every step file includes the required sprint contract sections from
docs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.md. python scripts/validate_workspace.pyexited successfully, but still reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Begin Phase 1 execution with
python scripts/execute.py 1-linear-static-mitc4after confirming readiness blockers are accepted, resolved, or intentionally deferred.
2026-05-01 - Phase 1 implementation master plan added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
PLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Expanded
PLAN.mdfrom a short implementation sequence into a Phase 1 master implementation plan. - Added Phase 1 Definition of Done, execution gates, milestone backlog P1-00 through P1-16, sprint contract rules, verification strategy, reference plan, and risk controls.
- Kept implementation blocked behind readiness decisions for MITC4 formulation, build system, reference comparator, reaction verification, and Phase 1-compatible reference input.
- Aligned the plan with the Planner -> Generator -> Evaluator harness in
docs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.md.
Verification:
- Reviewed the plan against
docs/PRD.md,docs/ARCHITECTURE.md,docs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.md,docs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.md,docs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.md,docs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.md,docs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.md, anddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.md. python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Convert P1 milestones into
phases/step files with sprint contract sections when the user asks for executable phase planning.
2026-05-01 - Planner/Generator/Evaluator harness structure added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
AGENTS.mdPLAN.mdPROGRESS.mdREADME.mddocs/README.mddocs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/harness-sprint-planner.toml.codex/agents/implementation-generator.toml.codex/agents/harness-sprint-evaluator.toml.codex/agents/phase-planner.toml.codex/agents/harness-reviewer.toml.codex/agents/test-strategy-reviewer.toml.codex/skills/fesa-phase-planning/SKILL.md.codex/skills/fesa-review/SKILL.md.codex/skills/fesa-cpp-tdd/SKILL.mdplugins/fesa-commands/commands/phase-draft.md
Summary:
- Added
docs/HARNESS_ENGINEERING.mdas the durable Planner -> Generator -> Evaluator contract for long-running FESA work. - Updated
AGENTS.mdso nontrivial solver, parser, result schema, reference comparator, MITC4, and phase execution work requires a sprint contract before implementation. - Added custom agents for sprint contract planning, contract-bound implementation, and independent sprint evaluation.
- Updated existing planner/reviewer/test strategy guidance to enforce contract compliance, evaluator pass/fail review, TDD, and PLAN/PROGRESS handoff.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.- Codex skill and plugin command frontmatter checks passed.
python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- When implementation planning begins, generate phase steps with sprint contract sections before assigning Generator work.
2026-05-01 - Abaqus reference CSV contract adopted
Author: Codex
Changed files:
AGENTS.mdREADME.mdPLAN.mdPROGRESS.mddocs/README.mddocs/PRD.mddocs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/ADR.mddocs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.mddocs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.mddocs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.mddocs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.mddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.mdreferences/README.md.codex/agents/*.toml.codex/skills/*.mdplugins/fesa-commands/commands/*.md
Summary:
- Accepted
references/as the project reference artifact root. - Documented the initial artifact pair
references/quad_01.inpandreferences/quad_01_displacements.csv. - Adopted Abaqus-exported
*_displacements.csvas the first automated displacement comparison format. - Mapped CSV columns
Node Label,U-U1,U-U2,U-U3,UR-UR1,UR-UR2,UR-UR3to FESAUcomponentsUX,UY,UZ,RX,RY,RZ. - Documented that
quad_01.inpincludesS4R,Part/Assembly/Instance,*Density, andNLGEOM=YES; it is stored reference provenance and a future compatibility target, not a Phase 1 parser acceptance expansion.
Verification:
- Inspected
quad_01_displacements.csv: 121 data rows and the required Abaqus displacement/rotation columns. - Parsed documentation and Codex extension metadata checks.
python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Add or define reaction-force reference artifacts, preferably
*_reactions.csv, or verifyRFby equilibrium tests until Abaqus RF CSV is available. - Add at least one Phase 1-compatible
TYPE=S4reference input for the first MITC4 linear static implementation path.
2026-05-01 - FESA commands converted to repo plugin
Author: Codex
Changed files:
plugins/fesa-commands/.codex-plugin/plugin.jsonplugins/fesa-commands/commands/*.md.agents/plugins/marketplace.json.codex/commands/*.md.codex/hooks/pre_edit_policy.py.codex/hooks/post_tool_use_policy.pyPLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Created the repo-local
fesa-commandsplugin and registered it in.agents/plugins/marketplace.json. - Moved the FESA command prompts from
.codex/commands/intoplugins/fesa-commands/commands/. - Removed the old
.codex/commands/*.mdfiles so plugin commands are the single maintained location. - Updated hook policy scripts to watch plugin manifests, plugin commands, and marketplace registration files.
- Resolved the prior
.codex/commandsdiscovery concern by converting the commands to plugin form.
Verification:
- Parsed plugin manifests and
.agents/plugins/marketplace.jsonwith Pythonjson. - Checked plugin command Markdown frontmatter.
- Parsed
.codex/config.tomland.codex/agents/*.tomlwith Pythontomllib. - Parsed
.codex/hooks.jsonwith Pythonjson. python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Confirm that the
fesa-commandsplugin appears in the active Codex plugin/command surface.
2026-05-01 - Project-local Codex extension pack added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
.codex/config.toml.codex/hooks.json.codex/agents/*.toml.codex/commands/*.md.codex/skills/*/SKILL.md.codex/hooks/*.pyPLAN.mdPROGRESS.md
Summary:
- Added focused project agents for reference artifact curation, numerical convention review, solver architecture, sparse solver design, HDF5 results schema, DOF/boundary conditions, C++ build planning, MITC4 implementation review, test strategy, and PLAN/PROGRESS auditing.
- Added project command prompts for status, readiness, plan sync, reference checks, documentation guards, phase drafting, ADR work, benchmark onboarding, extension verification, and handoff.
- Added project-local FESA skills and registered them through
.codex/config.toml. - Added hooks for session startup context, pre-edit coordination reminders, post-edit validation reminders, and expanded destructive shell command blocking.
Verification:
- Parsed
.codex/config.tomland.codex/agents/*.tomlwith Pythontomllib. - Parsed
.codex/hooks.jsonwith Pythonjson. - Checked
.codex/skills/*/SKILL.mdand.codex/commands/*.mdfrontmatter. - Smoke-tested the new hook scripts with representative JSON payloads.
python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Resolved later by converting
.codex/commands/*.mdinto thefesa-commandsrepo plugin. - Confirm hook behavior in the actual Codex runtime on native Windows.
2026-05-01 - PLAN/PROGRESS coordination files added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
PLAN.mdPROGRESS.mdAGENTS.mddocs/README.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/phase-planner.toml.codex/agents/harness-reviewer.toml
Summary:
- Added
PLAN.mdas the shared forward-looking work plan for multi-agent coordination. - Added
PROGRESS.mdas the shared chronological progress, verification, blocker, and risk log. - Updated
AGENTS.mdso every new work session must readPROGRESS.mdandPLAN.mdbefore planning or editing. - Updated documentation index and Codex agent instructions so planning/review agents enforce PLAN/PROGRESS usage.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
2026-05-01 - Documentation coordination and multi-agent planning state
Author: Codex
Changed files:
AGENTS.mdREADME.mddocs/README.mddocs/PRD.mddocs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/ADR.mddocs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.mddocs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.mddocs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.mddocs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.mddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/*.toml
Summary:
- Added
docs/README.mdas documentation index and implementation readiness gate. - Reinforced Phase 1 invariants across project docs.
- Added readiness gates for numerical conventions, parser acceptance, reference onboarding, mandatory result outputs, and MITC4 pre-implementation decisions.
- Updated Codex agent definitions so delegated agents read the current documentation set.
- Root
README.mdnow points to the FESA documentation entry point.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Follow-up:
- Keep
PLAN.mdandPROGRESS.mdcurrent for multi-agent coordination.
2026-04-22 - Technical dossier documents added
Author: Codex
Changed files:
docs/NUMERICAL_CONVENTIONS.mddocs/ABAQUS_INPUT_SUBSET.mddocs/VERIFICATION_PLAN.mddocs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.mddocs/MITC4_FORMULATION.mdAGENTS.mddocs/PRD.mddocs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/ADR.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/*.toml
Summary:
- Captured user decisions: 6 DOF shell nodes, artificial drilling stiffness, Abaqus-style units and signs, constrained DOF elimination, full-vector reaction recovery, no Phase 1 mesh quality diagnostics, singular diagnostics required,
double, int64 indexing, S4-to-MITC4 mapping, S4R deferral. - Added technical dossier documents for numerical conventions, Abaqus subset, verification, results schema, and MITC4 formulation.
- Added ADRs for numerical baseline, boundary/reaction policy, drilling stabilization, S4/S4R policy, singular diagnostics, and technical dossier contracts.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
2026-04-21 - Initial architecture and agent setup
Author: Codex
Changed files:
docs/PRD.mddocs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/ADR.mdAGENTS.mddocs/MULTI_AGENT_RESEARCH_PLAN.md.codex/agents/fem-literature-researcher.toml.codex/agents/verification-benchmark-researcher.toml.codex/agents/mitc4-formulation-researcher.toml.codex/agents/abaqus-compatibility-researcher.toml
Summary:
- Established solver architecture direction: runtime polymorphism, Strategy + Template Method, Factory + Registry, adapter boundaries, immutable
Domain, mutableAnalysisState,DofManagerownership, step/frame/history results. - Created first research agents for FEM literature, verification benchmarks, MITC4 formulation, and Abaqus compatibility.
Verification:
.codex/agents/*.tomlparsed successfully with Pythontomllib.python scripts/validate_workspace.pyran, but reported no configured validation commands.
Known Blockers
- No reaction-force reference artifact exists yet under
references/. - The current initial
quad_01.inpreference containsS4R,Part/Assembly/Instance,*Density, andNLGEOM=YES, so it is not a Phase 1 parser acceptance case as-is. quad_02.inpis a stored AbaqusTYPE=S4reference with matching displacement CSV, but it containsPart/Assembly/Instanceand*Density; Step 1 must define a normalized-input or explicit parser-compatibility path before stored-reference regression.
Current Risks
- Implementation could start from the
quad_01reference input without accounting for its unsupported Abaqus features. - Implementation could treat the old MITC4 kernel as authoritative even though it conflicts with the revised formulation contract.
- Reaction output may be wrong if full-space stiffness/load data is not preserved or reconstructed.
- Large-model support may be weakened if any module narrows ids or sparse indices below int64.