40 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
40 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: fem-release-readiness
|
|
description: Use when a structural FEM solver feature has completed technical gates and needs an evidence-based release-readiness audit.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# FEM Release Readiness
|
|
|
|
Audit closure evidence and prepare a release recommendation without modifying technical contracts or performing a release.
|
|
|
|
## Inputs
|
|
|
|
- All lifecycle artifacts for one `feature_id` and contract revision
|
|
- Passing configured full validation and required comparison evidence
|
|
- Passing physics review
|
|
- Correction history, accepted risks, and project release policy
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. Inventory required artifacts and verify identity, revision, freshness, ownership, outcome, and absence of contradictions.
|
|
2. Trace every blocking requirement through acceptance criteria, implementation/tests, required numerical or reference evidence, physics review, and final disposition.
|
|
3. Confirm unresolved defects, deferred scope, compatibility limits, unsupported behavior, accepted risks, and environment limits are explicit.
|
|
4. Produce the checklist, known limitations, release-notes draft, and readiness verdict. Return missing or failed evidence to its owning stage.
|
|
|
|
Use [evidence and handoff](../fem-requirements-baseline/references/evidence-and-handoff.md) to validate stage envelopes. Read [toolchain and verification](../fem-implementation-tdd/references/toolchain-and-verification.md) when auditing command or comparison evidence. Use [workflow and decision authority](../fem-requirements-baseline/references/workflow-and-decisions.md) for release-scope decisions.
|
|
|
|
## Output
|
|
|
|
Follow [Feature document management](../../../docs/FEATURE_DOCUMENTATION.md): read the Coordinator's
|
|
feature context, keep main reports concise, and link necessary owned details in the same feature folder.
|
|
|
|
Create or revise `docs/<feature-id>/release.md` with release scope, gate inventory, requirement traceability, validation summary, known limitations, deferred items, release-notes draft, readiness verdict, residual risks, and handoff.
|
|
|
|
## Evidence
|
|
|
|
A ready verdict requires complete, passing, current evidence for every blocking gate. Record artifact paths and hashes, configuration/toolchain identity, test and comparison summaries, approved exceptions, and the exact contract revision audited.
|
|
|
|
## Boundary
|
|
|
|
Do not implement or correct code, edit tests or upstream contracts, waive missing evidence, change acceptance or tolerance, or reinterpret a failed gate. Do not commit, tag, package, publish, deploy, or externally release anything unless the user explicitly authorizes that separate action. Readiness is a recommendation, not publication approval.
|