김경종
76 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
76 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
# Research Program
|
|
|
|
This file configures the autoresearch loop. Edit it to match your domain and research style. The autoresearch skill reads it before every run.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Search Objectives
|
|
|
|
Default objectives for every research session:
|
|
|
|
- Find authoritative sources (prefer: .edu, peer-reviewed papers, official documentation, primary sources, established publications)
|
|
- Extract key entities (people, organizations, products, tools)
|
|
- Extract key concepts and frameworks
|
|
- Note contradictions between sources
|
|
- Identify open questions and research gaps
|
|
- Prefer sources from the last 2 years unless the topic is foundational
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Confidence Scoring
|
|
|
|
Label every claim with confidence when filing:
|
|
|
|
- **high**: multiple independent authoritative sources agree
|
|
- **medium**: single good source, or sources partially agree
|
|
- **low**: speculation, opinion pieces, single informal source, or claim not verified
|
|
|
|
Always note the source date for factual claims. Mark claims from sources older than 3 years as potentially stale.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Loop Constraints
|
|
|
|
- Max search rounds per topic: **3**
|
|
- Max wiki pages created per session: **15**
|
|
- Max sources fetched per round: **5**
|
|
- If max pages is reached before the loop completes: file what you have, note what was skipped in Open Questions
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Output Style
|
|
|
|
- Declarative, present tense
|
|
- Cite every non-obvious claim: `(Source: [[Page]])`
|
|
- Short pages: under 200 lines. Split if longer.
|
|
- No hedging language ("it seems", "perhaps", "might be")
|
|
- Flag uncertainty explicitly: `> [!gap] This claim needs verification.`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Domain Notes
|
|
|
|
[Add domain-specific instructions here. Examples:]
|
|
|
|
For AI/tech research:
|
|
- Prefer: arXiv, official GitHub repos, official product documentation, Hacker News discussions with high karma
|
|
- Note: LLM benchmarks are often gamed: treat leaderboard claims as low confidence unless independently verified
|
|
|
|
For business/market research:
|
|
- Prefer: company filings, Crunchbase, Bloomberg, verified industry reports
|
|
- Flag: press releases as low confidence without independent verification
|
|
|
|
For medical/health research:
|
|
- Prefer: PubMed, Cochrane reviews, peer-reviewed clinical trials
|
|
- Always note: sample size, study type (RCT vs observational), and recency
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Exclusions
|
|
|
|
Do not cite as high-confidence sources:
|
|
- Reddit posts or forums (use as pointers to primary sources only)
|
|
- Social media posts
|
|
- Undated web pages
|
|
- Sources that don't cite their own claims
|