Files
MultiPhysicsVault/wiki/concepts/Abaqus Progressive Damage and Failure.md
T
김경종 b195ac126c
Tests / Hermetic test suite (push) Has been cancelled
Tests / Skill frontmatter validation (push) Has been cancelled
add wiki
2026-06-01 09:36:33 +09:00

2.8 KiB

type, title, complexity, domain, created, updated, address, aliases, tags, status, related, sources
type title complexity domain created updated address aliases tags status related sources
concept Abaqus Progressive Damage and Failure advanced computational-mechanics 2026-06-01 2026-06-01 c-000098
Abaqus damage initiation
Abaqus damage evolution
Abaqus element deletion
Abaqus composite damage
concept
finite-element-method
abaqus
damage
failure
materials
current
Abaqus-Analysis-User-s-Guide-Volume-III
Abaqus Metal Plasticity Models
Abaqus Fracture and Enriched Discontinuity Modeling
Abaqus Output Database and Results Files
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis
Abaqus-Analysis-User-s-Guide-Volume-III

Abaqus Progressive Damage and Failure

Definition

Abaqus progressive damage and failure models degrade material stiffness after a damage initiation criterion is met and can remove failed elements from the calculation.

How It Works

The guide organizes failure modeling into four parts: the undamaged material response, damage initiation, damage evolution, and optional element deletion. For ductile metals, Abaqus supports multiple initiation criteria, including ductile, shear, forming-limit, forming-limit-stress, MSFLD, and Marciniak-Kuczynski criteria. Damage evolution then progressively degrades stiffness.

For fiber-reinforced composites, the undamaged response is treated as linearly elastic, damage initiation is based on Hashin-type criteria, and damage evolution is based on energy dissipated during the damage process. For low-cycle fatigue in Abaqus/Standard, damage initiation and evolution are driven by accumulated inelastic hysteresis energy per stabilized cycle in the direct cyclic workflow.

The source highlights mesh dependency in softening materials. Abaqus alleviates this by using a characteristic length tied to element size and expressing damage evolution in a stress-displacement or energy-per-area form rather than a purely local stress-strain softening curve.

Why It Matters

Failure simulation changes the finite element problem from smooth nonlinear constitutive response to localization, stiffness degradation, and topology change. Without attention to characteristic length, energy dissipation, and element deletion side effects, results can become mesh-dependent or numerically unstable.

Connections

Sources