Files
MultiPhysicsVault/wiki/concepts/Abaqus Explicit Analysis Efficiency Techniques.md
T
김경종 b7b79e38b1
Tests / Hermetic test suite (push) Has been cancelled
Tests / Skill frontmatter validation (push) Has been cancelled
modify wiki
2026-05-29 17:05:53 +09:00

2.5 KiB

type, title, complexity, domain, created, updated, address, aliases, tags, status, related, sources
type title complexity domain created updated address aliases tags status related sources
concept Abaqus Explicit Analysis Efficiency Techniques advanced computational-mechanics 2026-05-29 2026-05-29 c-000087
Abaqus mass scaling
Abaqus selective subcycling
Abaqus steady-state detection
concept
finite-element-method
abaqus
explicit-dynamics
performance
current
Abaqus-Analysis-User-s-Guide-Volume-II
Direct Time Integration Methods
Abaqus Resource and Parallel Execution
Abaqus Nonlinear Solution Control
Abaqus-Analysis-User-s-Guide-Volume-II

Abaqus Explicit Analysis Efficiency Techniques

Definition

Abaqus explicit analysis efficiency techniques adjust or monitor an Abaqus/Explicit run to reduce computational cost while preserving the needed accuracy.

How It Works

Mass scaling artificially increases element or model mass to increase the stable explicit time increment. It is commonly used in quasi-static explicit analyses and sometimes in dynamic analyses where a few very small or distorted elements control the global time increment.

Fixed mass scaling is applied once at the beginning of a step. Variable mass scaling can be applied during a step when stiffness, deformation, or element size changes significantly. The guide emphasizes that quasi-static uses can tolerate more scaling than true dynamic events, where physical mass and inertia must remain accurate.

The same chapter group also covers selective subcycling and steady-state detection. These techniques aim to avoid unnecessary explicit increments or focus small time increments where they are actually needed.

Why It Matters

Explicit dynamics is often limited by the stable time increment rather than by nonlinear iteration. Efficiency techniques can make contact, forming, impact, or quasi-static explicit workflows practical, but they can also corrupt inertia-sensitive results if used carelessly.

Connections

Sources