1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| description | argument-hint | allowed-tools | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review core project documents for consistency with fixed decisions |
|
|
/review-project-docs
Review project documents for contradictions, stale decisions, and missing constraints.
Arguments
The user invoked this command with: $ARGUMENTS
Workflow
- Read
PLAN.mdandPROGRESS.md. - Read
docs/WORKARCHIVE.mdwhen reviewing completed-work history, prior verification, or sample conversion evidence. - Read the requested document scope, defaulting to
AGENTS.md,PRD.md,ARCHITECTURE.md,docs/V1IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN.md,docs/WORKARCHIVE.md, anddocs/KNOWLEDGEBASE.md. - Check for contradictions against fixed decisions: MinerU 3.1.0 only, local-only, direct CLI execution, CLI-internal temporary local
mineru-apiallowed, no--api-urlor remote API path, Python 3.12, uv, Obsidian Markdown, no public metadata JSON for new conversions, one<stem>_report.md, and any UI launcher invoking the existingpdf2mdCLI rather than MinerU directly. - Report findings first with file and line references.
- If edits are requested, make only surgical documentation changes and update
PROGRESS.md.
Guardrails
- Do not add speculative features, alternate engines, hosted web apps, cloud OCR, or manual review queues. A thin local UI launcher is allowed only when it follows
docs/UI_RESEARCH.md,docs/Sprints/SPRINT12CONTRACT.md, and the relevantdocs/superpowers/UI design or plan. - Do not rewrite unrelated prose while fixing one inconsistency.