32 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
32 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: fixture-evaluation
|
|
description: Plan local fixture-based quality checks for this MinerU PDF-to-Markdown converter using samples/ without committing sample PDFs. Use when Codex needs to define sample coverage, quality metrics, regression checks, JSON metadata assertions, or human-readable .report.md expectations.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Fixture Evaluation
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
Use this skill to turn local sample PDFs into a small, repeatable quality plan. Keep samples local and untracked unless the user explicitly asks to commit them.
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. Read `PLAN.md` and `PROGRESS.md` first.
|
|
2. Read `docs/WORKARCHIVE.md` when prior fixture coverage, verification, or sample conversion evidence is needed.
|
|
3. Inspect `samples/` only enough to understand fixture categories and filenames.
|
|
4. Map each fixture to risks: math, tables, multi-column reading order, figures/assets, Korean filenames, and metadata coverage.
|
|
5. Separate fast checks using mocked MinerU outputs from optional checks that require MinerU models, GPU, or long execution.
|
|
6. Define metrics for both JSON metadata and `<stem>.report.md`.
|
|
7. Update `PROGRESS.md` with fixture coverage and gaps.
|
|
|
|
## Guardrails
|
|
|
|
- Do not commit sample PDFs.
|
|
- Do not copy samples into tracked fixtures without explicit user permission.
|
|
- Do not make GPU/model-dependent checks mandatory for the default fast loop.
|
|
- Do not grade only plain-text edit distance; include math, tables, reading order, assets, metadata, and renderability.
|
|
|
|
## Reference
|
|
|
|
Read `references/evaluation-metrics.md` when defining fixture coverage, regression criteria, or report fields.
|