김경종
28 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
28 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Review core project documents for consistency with fixed decisions
|
|
argument-hint: [scope]
|
|
allowed-tools: [Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, Edit]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# /review-project-docs
|
|
|
|
Review project documents for contradictions, stale decisions, and missing constraints.
|
|
|
|
## Arguments
|
|
|
|
The user invoked this command with: $ARGUMENTS
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. Read `PLAN.md` and `PROGRESS.md`.
|
|
2. Read `docs/WORKARCHIVE.md` when reviewing completed-work history, prior verification, or sample conversion evidence.
|
|
3. Read the requested document scope, defaulting to `AGENTS.md`, `PRD.md`, `ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/KNOWLEDGEBASE.md`.
|
|
4. Check for contradictions against fixed decisions: MinerU 3.1.0 only, local-only, direct CLI execution, CLI-internal temporary local `mineru-api` allowed, no `--api-url` or remote API path, Python 3.12, uv, Obsidian Markdown, metadata JSON, and `.report.md`.
|
|
5. Report findings first with file and line references.
|
|
6. If edits are requested, make only surgical documentation changes and update `PROGRESS.md`.
|
|
|
|
## Guardrails
|
|
|
|
- Do not add speculative features, alternate engines, web UI, cloud OCR, or manual review queues.
|
|
- Do not rewrite unrelated prose while fixing one inconsistency.
|